Website review, no card needed

inspireselection.com logo

inspireselection.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202633 issues · 82 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on inspireselection.com, 7 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 21.5 MB in 47 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.2 s1.4 sMay 2Oct 171.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.0 s
May 9, 20262.1 s
May 16, 20262.0 s
May 23, 20261.8 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20261.8 s
Jun 13, 20261.9 s
Jun 20, 20261.9 s
Jun 27, 20261.9 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20261.5 s
Jul 18, 20261.6 s
Jul 25, 20261.7 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.9 s
Aug 22, 20261.9 s
Aug 29, 20261.9 s
Sep 5, 20261.7 s
Sep 12, 20261.6 s
Sep 19, 20261.5 s
Sep 26, 20261.5 s
Oct 3, 20261.5 s
Oct 10, 20261.6 s
Oct 17, 20261.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
98 ms78 msMay 2Oct 1785 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202695 ms
May 9, 202695 ms
May 16, 202696 ms
May 23, 202695 ms
May 30, 202696 ms
Jun 6, 202695 ms
Jun 13, 202694 ms
Jun 20, 202694 ms
Jun 27, 202686 ms
Jul 4, 202686 ms
Jul 11, 202686 ms
Jul 18, 202686 ms
Jul 25, 202695 ms
Aug 1, 202695 ms
Aug 8, 202695 ms
Aug 15, 202689 ms
Aug 22, 202692 ms
Aug 29, 202687 ms
Sep 5, 202686 ms
Sep 12, 202684 ms
Sep 19, 202680 ms
Sep 26, 202680 ms
Oct 3, 202685 ms
Oct 10, 202682 ms
Oct 17, 202685 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of inspireselection.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. inspireselection.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. inspireselection.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. inspireselection.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. inspireselection.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. inspireselection.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. inspireselection.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. inspireselection.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. inspireselection.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

8 to fix87
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.0 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.0 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    10.2 MB

    11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (10.2 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    6.4 MB

    4 images could be 6.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (website-files.com, Google CDN and cloudfront.net and others), adding 21.3 MB and 383 ms of main-thread time.

  • website-files.com adds 211 ms

    211 ms

    website-files.com costs a phone 211 ms of main-thread work and 20.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 87

    87/100

    Your mobile performance score is 87 (desktop: 99). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    322 KiB

    About 322 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Google CDN adds 117 ms

    117 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 117 ms of main-thread work and 354 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 122 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    31 KiB

    About 31 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Minify CSS

    6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 450 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 7.6 s

    7.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 7.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 880 ms

    880 ms

    Real visitors wait 880 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    Your largest element takes 3.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Specialist Recruiters for Professional People The differenc…”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 13 images without width and height

    13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

9 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 85 ms

    85 ms

    Real visitors wait 85 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 95 ms to 85 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 22% faster for real visitors

    -22%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Speed Index: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 2.3 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 65 ms

    65 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 65 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 21.5 MB in 47 requests

    21.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 21.5 MB in 47 requests on a phone: images 10.6 MB (20), media 10.1 MB (2) and scripts 670 KiB (17). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 6.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    6.09 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.09 g of CO₂e: 730.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8790
  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (8 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 16 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 35 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 35 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9285
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 9 H1 headlines

    There are 9 <h1> headlines (“Specialist Recruiters for Professional People”, “Why Inspire Selection” and “The difference is our talent”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 32 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 32 pages on inspireselection.com and 6 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 152 characters

    Your meta description is 152 characters: “Experts at connecting the best people to the right opportunities. Inspire Selection is a leading boutique recruitment a…”.

  • Title: 55 characters

    Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “Inspire Selection | Leading Recruitment Agency in Dubai”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.inspireselection.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.inspireselection.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,436 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix88
  • 5 pages without a meta description

    https://www.inspireselection.com/clients, https://www.inspireselection.com/candidates, https://www.inspireselection.com/vacancies, https://www.inspireselection.com/testimonials and https://www.inspireselection.com/privacy have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 pages share a meta description

    https://www.inspireselection.com/about, https://www.inspireselection.com/our-specialisms, https://www.inspireselection.com/insights and https://www.inspireselection.com/contact-us use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    https://www.inspireselection.com/vacancies, https://www.inspireselection.com/insights and https://www.inspireselection.com/contact-us have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 9 internal pages checked

    We fetched 9 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 9 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 9 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    8 of 8 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix80
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,156 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,156 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Learn more” and “learn more”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 14 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 10 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at inspireselection.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Analytics
Google Analytics

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on inspireselection.com, including 14 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25