Website review, no card needed
interlem.it website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202637 issues · 84 checks
This review found 37 issues worth fixing on interlem.it, 16 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
74CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideOne score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.1 s
2.1 s
3.2 s
4.2 s
5.3 s
6.3 s
7.4 s
8.4 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
9.7 s · 2.0 MBAbout 2.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 9.7 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.8 s · 2.4 MB78 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.4 MB).
Render-blocking requests
3.2 s34 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.2 s.
Reduce unused CSS
1.2 s · 229 KiBAbout 229 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
YouTube adds 1.1 s
1.1 sYouTube costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 2.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 4.9 s
A phone's processor spends 4.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google CDN and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 4.0 MB and 1.7 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
900 ms · 764 KiB10 images could be 764 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 50
50/100Your mobile performance score is 50 (desktop: 48). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Font display
750 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 750 ms).
Google CDN adds 337 ms
337 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 337 ms of main-thread work and 733 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 15 KiB15 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 8 KiB8 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
17 long tasks on the main thread
17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 149 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
7 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 7 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 211 ms
211 msYour server sent the HTML in 211 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 22.7 s
22.7 sYour largest element takes 22.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Webinar - Giovedì 22 ottobre 2026 Ore 14:30 L’AI per ridise…”.
Speed Index: 19.0 s
19.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 19.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 33.6 s
33.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 33.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.4 s
3.4 sThe first text or image appears after 3.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 385 ms
385 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 385 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
4 images without width and height
4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Not enough real-visitor data yet
Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.
1 checks passed
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.003
0.003The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.003, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.8 MB in 159 requests
6.8 MBYour homepage downloads 6.8 MB in 159 requests on a phone: scripts 3.6 MB (45), images 2.0 MB (30) and other files 364 KiB (40). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
11 images in older formats
11 images (1.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
10 images below the first screen load straight away
10 images further down the page (989 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
11 images far larger than shown
2 KiB11 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example soluzioni_sap_hp.jpg at 952 px wide, shown at 317 px. Resized copies would save about 2 KiB.
About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit
1.92 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.92 g of CO₂e: 230.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
9 text elements with low contrast
9 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Links look like plain text
5 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.
Frames without titles
3 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (30 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 30 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
3 links without text
3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h3 → h5 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 20 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
34 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 34 passed and 10 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (69 characters)
Your title is 69 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Software e Soluzioni ICT, Consulenza, Tecnologie e Servizi | Interlem”.
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
74 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 74 pages on interlem.it and 6 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 150 characters
Your meta description is 150 characters: “Interlem opera nell’Information Tecnology. Focalizzati sulle nuove tecnologie semplifichiamo l’integrazione tra aziende…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “L’AI per ridisegnare i processi in SAP S/4HANA. E automatizzarli davvero.”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.interlem.it/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.interlem.it/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.interlem.it/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,051 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages slow to respond
https://www.interlem.it/soluzioni/soluzioni-per-la-pianificazione and https://www.interlem.it/servizi took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 42 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
4 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 4 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 4 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
12 of 14 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 985 words of copy
The homepage carries about 985 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo and 2 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
11 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at interlem.it, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 37 issues on interlem.it, including 17 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.