Website review, no card needed

intermed.com logo

intermed.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202633 issues · 87 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on intermed.com, 6 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 4.1 MB in 66 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.2 s878 msMay 9Oct 241.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.2 s
May 16, 20261.1 s
May 23, 20261.1 s
May 30, 2026979 ms
Jun 6, 2026945 ms
Jun 13, 2026951 ms
Jun 20, 2026945 ms
Jun 27, 2026971 ms
Jul 4, 2026983 ms
Jul 11, 2026979 ms
Jul 18, 2026976 ms
Jul 25, 2026975 ms
Aug 1, 2026979 ms
Aug 8, 2026962 ms
Aug 15, 2026954 ms
Aug 22, 2026929 ms
Aug 29, 2026917 ms
Sep 5, 2026954 ms
Sep 12, 2026978 ms
Sep 19, 20261.0 s
Sep 26, 20261.0 s
Oct 3, 20261.0 s
Oct 10, 20261.0 s
Oct 17, 20261.0 s
Oct 24, 20261.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
91 ms82 msMay 9Oct 2490 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202688 ms
May 16, 202687 ms
May 23, 202689 ms
May 30, 202689 ms
Jun 6, 202688 ms
Jun 13, 202687 ms
Jun 20, 202686 ms
Jun 27, 202687 ms
Jul 4, 202688 ms
Jul 11, 202688 ms
Jul 18, 202689 ms
Jul 25, 202690 ms
Aug 1, 202690 ms
Aug 8, 202689 ms
Aug 15, 202687 ms
Aug 22, 202685 ms
Aug 29, 202683 ms
Sep 5, 202685 ms
Sep 12, 202685 ms
Sep 19, 202687 ms
Sep 26, 202688 ms
Oct 3, 202690 ms
Oct 10, 202690 ms
Oct 17, 202690 ms
Oct 24, 202690 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of intermed.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. intermed.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. intermed.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. intermed.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. intermed.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. intermed.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. intermed.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. intermed.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. intermed.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

9 to fix78
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    500 ms · 2.7 MB

    47 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.7 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 2.0 MB

    About 2.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 78

    78/100

    Your mobile performance score is 78. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    800 ms

    13 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 800 ms.

  • Minify JavaScript

    741 KiB

    741 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Improve image delivery

    591 KiB

    5 images could be 591 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, ecwcloud.com and Hubspot and others), adding 2.9 MB and 280 ms of main-thread time.

  • ecwcloud.com adds 113 ms

    113 ms

    ecwcloud.com costs a phone 113 ms of main-thread work and 2.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 121 ms

    121 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 121 ms of main-thread work and 301 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 134 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    13 KiB

    About 13 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 345 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 22.0 s

    22.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 22.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    Your largest element takes 4.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Welcome to InterMed Serving Portland and its surrounding co…”.

  • Speed Index: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 5 images without width and height

    5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 88 ms to 90 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

10 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 95 ms

    95 ms

    Real visitors wait 95 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 364 ms

    364 ms

    Real visitors wait 364 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 11% faster for real visitors

    -11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.2 s to 1.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.082

    0.082

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.082, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 46 ms

    46 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 46 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 4.1 MB in 66 requests

    4.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.1 MB in 66 requests on a phone: scripts 2.9 MB (17), images 1.0 MB (20) and fonts 129 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (363 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (274 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.16 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.16 g of CO₂e: 139.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9094
  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (10 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 24 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10080
  • Title is short (8 characters)

    Your title is only 8 characters: “Intermed”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (166 characters)

    Your meta description is 166 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.intermed.com/sitemap_index.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 73 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 73 pages on intermed.com and 5 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Welcometo InterMed”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.intermed.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.intermed.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (454 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix85
  • 10 pages without a meta description

    https://www.intermed.com/provider-search, https://www.intermed.com/practices-and-treatments, https://www.intermed.com/resources/forms-policies, https://www.intermed.com/pediatrics, https://www.intermed.com/additional-billing-information and https://www.intermed.com/community-support-group and 4 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.intermed.com/practices-and-treatments, whose canonical is https://www.intermed.com/practices-and-services. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 5 pages without an H1

    https://www.intermed.com/get-care-now, https://www.intermed.com/practices-and-treatments, https://www.intermed.com/resources/forms-policies, https://www.intermed.com/community-support-group and https://www.intermed.com/hours-of-operation have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 25 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9278
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.intermed.com/.

  • 8 small tap targets

    8 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix69
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 276 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 276 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SCHEDULE YOUR VACCINE”.

  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “SCHEDULE YOUR VACCINE”, “Learn More About InterMed” and “Contact Us”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Opening hours shown

    Your opening hours are on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and HubSpot (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 15 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner

    A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at intermed.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
HubSpot CMS
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
HubSpot

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on intermed.com, including 13 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25