Website review, no card needed
iper.it website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202650 issues · 113 checks
This review found 50 issues worth fixing on iper.it, 22 of them high impact, across 113 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
66DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 193 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 192 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 214 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 217 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 214 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 214 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 215 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 217 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 218 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 218 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 213 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
5.0 s · 1.1 MBAbout 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.0 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.6 s · 658 KiB15 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (658 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 43
43/100Your mobile performance score is 43. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
5,068 HTML elements
The page has 5,068 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Main-thread work: 4.7 s
A phone's processor spends 4.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Gigya, Google Tag Manager and Accessibe Accessibility Overlay and others), adding 2.4 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.
Gigya adds 689 ms
689 msGigya costs a phone 689 ms of main-thread work and 846 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 560 ms
560 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 560 ms of main-thread work and 706 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
334 KiB13 images could be 334 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
16 long tasks on the main thread
16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 198 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.
Reduce unused CSS
57 KiBAbout 57 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 59 ms
59 msYour server sent the HTML in 59 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 21.1 s
21.1 sYour largest element takes 21.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 26.8 s
26.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 26.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.1 s
10.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 834 ms
834 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 834 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 208 ms
208 msReal visitors wait 208 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s
2.7 sThe first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
10 images without width and height
10 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors
+11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 193 ms to 213 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 608 ms
608 msReal visitors wait 608 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002
0.002The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.5 MB in 228 requests
5.5 MBYour homepage downloads 5.5 MB in 228 requests on a phone: images 2.4 MB (116), scripts 2.2 MB (61) and fonts 360 KiB (12). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
8 images below the first screen load straight away
8 images further down the page (354 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit
1.56 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.56 g of CO₂e: 187.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
19 buttons without a name
19 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
11 text elements with low contrast
11 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Positive tabindex
2 elements have a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
10 tap targets too small
10 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Elements use prohibited ARIA attributes
Elements use prohibited ARIA attributes (1 element).
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h6 and h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 201 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 8 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Meta description is long (174 characters)
Your meta description is 174 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.iper.it/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at iper.it/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
8 links crawlers can't follow
8 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
118 internal links, 19 external
The homepage links to 118 pages on iper.it and 19 external pages.
3 checks passed
Title: 47 characters
Your title is a healthy 47 characters: “Ipermercati Iper | molto piu di un supermercato”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.iper.it/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, description and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,210 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a title
/iper-mag has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
2 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /servizi/salute, whose canonical is /servizi/salute/page-1. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
15 pages without an H1
/carta-vantaggi, /servizi/animali/pet-food-store, /punti-vendita, /le-nostre-produzioni, /i-nostri-ristoranti and /mangiare-da-iper and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 62 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Best practices
2 broken images
2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.iper.it/.
37 third-party cookies
37 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
Requests the geolocation permission on page load
Requests the geolocation permission on page load.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
44 of 45 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
2 broken links to your own pages
2 links from your homepage to your own site are broken, for example https://www.iper.it/servizi/iperdrive/spendi-e-riprendi/ (404).
1 broken external link
1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://www.ilviaggiatorgoloso.it/wp-content/themes/ilviaggiatorgoloso/pdf/VG_Catalogo-Natale-24_DiarioDiViaggio.pdf (404).
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://itunes.apple.com/it/app/iper-la-grande-i/id1086027077?l=en&mt=8&utm_medium=referral.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (iper.it).
Valid certificate (54 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE2 verifies for iper.it and is valid for another 54 days.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://iper.it redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
iper.it has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 942 words of copy
The homepage carries about 942 words of visible text.
1 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be iper.it is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.
Email authentication score: 70/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 mx ip4:94.141.31.211/32 ip4:94.141.31.212/32 ip4:194.244.20.0/24 ip4:217.169.115.96/27 include:spf.mandrillapp.c…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “s1” and “mandrill”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
9 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- Astro
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Netlify
Company
- Founded
- 1974
- Headquarters
- Milan
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 50 issues on iper.it, including 17 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.