Website review, no card needed

iponweb.com logo

iponweb.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202640 issues · 107 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on iponweb.com, 11 of them high impact, across 107 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.3 s2.1 sMay 9Oct 242.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.4 s
May 16, 20263.4 s
May 23, 20263.4 s
May 30, 20263.6 s
Jun 6, 20263.4 s
Jun 13, 20263.3 s
Jun 20, 20263.0 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20263.3 s
Jul 11, 20263.8 s
Jul 18, 20264.0 s
Jul 25, 20264.1 s
Aug 1, 20263.9 s
Aug 8, 20263.8 s
Aug 15, 20263.5 s
Aug 22, 20263.4 s
Aug 29, 20263.4 s
Sep 5, 20263.2 s
Sep 12, 20263.1 s
Sep 19, 20263.2 s
Sep 26, 20263.1 s
Oct 3, 20262.9 s
Oct 10, 20262.8 s
Oct 17, 20262.5 s
Oct 24, 20262.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
318 ms199 msMay 9Oct 24298 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026214 ms
May 16, 2026214 ms
May 23, 2026220 ms
May 30, 2026224 ms
Jun 6, 2026233 ms
Jun 13, 2026235 ms
Jun 20, 2026229 ms
Jun 27, 2026227 ms
Jul 4, 2026226 ms
Jul 11, 2026226 ms
Jul 18, 2026226 ms
Jul 25, 2026226 ms
Aug 1, 2026230 ms
Aug 8, 2026234 ms
Aug 15, 2026232 ms
Aug 22, 2026226 ms
Aug 29, 2026220 ms
Sep 5, 2026213 ms
Sep 12, 2026224 ms
Sep 19, 2026235 ms
Sep 26, 2026259 ms
Oct 3, 2026283 ms
Oct 10, 2026291 ms
Oct 17, 2026304 ms
Oct 24, 2026298 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

10 to fix44
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.2 s

    8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 44

    44/100

    Your mobile performance score is 44 (desktop: 60). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, reddit and Facebook and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.8 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    750 ms · 166 KiB

    About 166 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 631 ms

    631 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 631 ms of main-thread work and 709 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • reddit adds 612 ms

    612 ms

    reddit costs a phone 612 ms of main-thread work and 26 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    573 KiB

    About 573 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    436 KiB

    14 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (436 KiB).

  • 18 long tasks on the main thread

    18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 282 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify JavaScript

    66 KiB

    66 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    59 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 59 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 6 ms

    6 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 26.7 s

    26.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 26.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.2 s

    7.2 s

    Your largest element takes 7.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Criteo Enters Into Exclusive Negotiations to Acquire IPONWE…”.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user INP: 302 ms

    302 ms

    Real visitors wait 302 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 41% slower for real visitors

    +41%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 214 ms to 298 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 5.4 s

    5.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 12 images without width and height

    12 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 774 ms

    774 ms

    Real visitors wait 774 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 29% faster for real visitors

    -29%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.4 MB in 150 requests

    3.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.4 MB in 150 requests on a phone: scripts 1.9 MB (53), fonts 1.2 MB (14) and stylesheets 173 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.96 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.96 g of CO₂e: 114.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

11 to fixGoogle 8286
  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (53 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 53 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 17 links without text

    17 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" do not have accessible names.

    Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" do not have accessible names. (1 element).

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (7 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 15 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 10 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9288
  • Title is long (111 characters)

    Your title is 111 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Criteo Enters Into Exclusive Negotiations to Acquire IPONWEB, a Market-Leading AdTech Pla…”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 15 links crawlers can't follow

    15 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 143 internal links, 35 external

    The homepage links to 143 pages on iponweb.com and 35 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 70 characters

    Your meta description is 70 characters: “Read the latest Criteo press releases and other ad tech industry news.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Criteo Enters Into Exclusive Negotiations to Acquire IPONWEB, a Market-Leading AdTech Platform Company”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.criteo.com/news/press-releases/2021/12/criteo-enters-into-exclusive-negotiations-to-acquire-iponweb/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, NewsArticle, Organization, Person and WebPage.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.criteo.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,707 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /news/press-releases/2026/10/criteo-ssp-recognized-by-frost-sullivan-for-commerce-media-innovation/%20, whose canonical is /news/press-releases/2026/10/criteo-ssp-recognized-by-frost-sullivan-for-commerce-media-innovation. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page without an H1

    /talk-to-an-expert has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    /talk-to-an-expert has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 79 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 5 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • Short HSTS lifetime

    HSTS is set, but max-age is 0 days; one year is the recommended minimum.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • 3 links through redirect chains

    3 links go through two or more redirects, for example http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.criteo.com%2Fnews%2Fpress-releases%2F2021%2F12%2Fcriteo-enters-into-exclusive-negotiations-to-acquire-iponweb/&title=Criteo%20Enters%20Into%20Exclusive%20Negotiations%20to%20Acquire%20IPONWEB%2C%20a%20Market-Leading%20AdTech%20Platform%20Company&source=https%3a%2f%2fwww.criteo.com/.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (criteo.com).

  • Valid certificate (77 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for iponweb.com and is valid for another 77 days.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://iponweb.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 55 links work

    All 55 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 15 external) answered without errors.

  • security.txt published

    A security.txt file tells researchers how to report a problem with your site.

Domain and trust

  • DNSSEC is off

    criteo.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 21 years old

    21 years

    criteo.com was registered in Jun 2005 through Gandi SAS. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only digicert.com, pki.goog, godaddy.com and amazon.com to issue certificates for criteo.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

  • Registered until Jun 2035

    criteo.com is registered until Jun 2035.

Content and conversion

1 to fix90
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 2,594 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,594 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Sales”.

  • 10 calls to action

    The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Contact Sales”, “DOWNLOAD PDF” and “Contact Us”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Email authentication

95
  • Email authentication score: 95/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com a:jira.iponweb.net a:jira-aws-ie-3.it.iponweb.net a:jira-aws-ie-4.it.iponweb.…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “selector1” and “selector2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 11 trackers load before any consent

    11

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amplitude, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight and 6 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Usercentrics) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 21 cookies set on arrival

    21

    Opening the homepage sets 21 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 41 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 41 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Usercentrics

    A consent management tool (Usercentrics) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • It runs WordPress 3.7.1; the current release is 7.1.3.

Stack

CMS
WordPress 3.7.1

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on iponweb.com, including 20 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25