Website review, no card needed
itam.mx website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202649 issues · 92 checks
This review found 49 issues worth fixing on itam.mx, 19 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
66DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 138 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 140 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 146 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 163 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
9.8 s · 1.8 MB140 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.8 MB).
Improve image delivery
9.4 s · 1.4 MB5 images could be 1.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 9.4 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
7.0 s · 916 KiBAbout 916 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.0 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
7.1 s97 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 7.1 s.
Mobile performance score: 22
22/100Your mobile performance score is 22 (desktop: 22). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Reduce unused CSS
900 ms · 192 KiBAbout 192 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Hubspot and others), adding 1.4 MB and 924 ms of main-thread time.
Minify JavaScript
600 ms · 137 KiB137 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Google Tag Manager adds 408 ms
408 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 408 ms of main-thread work and 737 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
300 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 300 ms).
2,869 HTML elements
The page has 2,869 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Facebook adds 224 ms
224 msFacebook costs a phone 224 ms of main-thread work and 344 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.5 s
A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Legacy JavaScript
200 ms · 26 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 26 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 25 KiB25 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
16 long tasks on the main thread
16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 157 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 90 ms
90 msYour server sent the HTML in 90 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
First Contentful Paint: 8.1 s
8.1 sThe first text or image appears after 8.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 89.9 s
89.9 sYour largest element takes 89.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 90.2 s
90.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 90.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.4 s
11.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.567
0.567The layout shifts by 0.567 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Real-user LCP: 3.6 s
3.6 sReal visitors wait 3.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 447 ms
447 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 447 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
8 images without width and height
8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 16% slower for real visitors
+16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 138 ms to 163 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.5 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 194 ms
194 msReal visitors wait 194 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.09
0.09For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.09 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 696 ms
696 msReal visitors wait 696 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 16.4 MB in 178 requests
16.4 MBYour homepage downloads 16.4 MB in 178 requests on a phone: images 14.1 MB (33), scripts 1.8 MB (73) and stylesheets 319 KiB (49). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 3.0 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
9 images in older formats
9 images (4.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 4.7 g of CO₂ per visit
4.66 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.66 g of CO₂e: 558.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
17 text elements with low contrast
17 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
10 tap targets too small
10 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (8 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 25 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
28 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 36 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 28 passed and 8 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
57 links crawlers can't follow
57 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
Title is short (24 characters)
Your title is only 24 characters: “Bienvenido a ITAM | ITAM”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
6 H1 headlines
There are 6 <h1> headlines (“El ITAM es”, “Su misión es” and “Investigación, docencia y extensión”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
184 internal links, 350 external
The homepage links to 184 pages on itam.mx and 350 external pages.
3 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.itam.mx/es/node.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.itam.mx/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.itam.mx/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,005 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
/ and https://www.itam.mx/es all use the title “Bienvenido a ITAM | ITAM”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
7 pages without a meta description
https://www.itam.mx/es/1/contenido/rio-hondo, https://www.itam.mx/es/1/contenido/santa-teresa, https://www.itam.mx/es/comunicados-oficiales, https://www.itam.mx/en, https://www.itam.mx/es and https://www.itam.mx/es/1/paginas/rectoria and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.itam.mx/en, whose canonical is https://www.itam.mx/en/node. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
12 pages without an H1
https://www.itam.mx/es/1/contenido/rio-hondo, https://www.itam.mx/es/1/contenido/santa-teresa, https://www.itam.mx/es/alumnos-de-nuevo-ingreso-itam, https://www.itam.mx/es/comunicados-oficiales, https://www.itam.mx/es/medidas-del-itam-ante-el-covid-19 and https://www.itam.mx/es/preguntas-frecuentes and 6 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 84 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
10 of 11 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 318 words of copy
The homepage carries about 318 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact Us”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics, Meta Pixel, Hotjar and HubSpot.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and HubSpot and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
14 cookies set on arrival
14Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
29 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 29 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at itam.mx, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- Drupal
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Hotjar
- Hosting
- Tecnologico Autonomo de MexicoITAM
Company
- Employees
- 663
- Founded
- 1946
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 49 issues on itam.mx, including 23 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.