Website review, no card needed
johnseastern.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202634 issues · 81 checks
This review found 34 issues worth fixing on johnseastern.com, 13 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 113 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 113 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 114 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 128 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.6 s · 3.1 MB45 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.1 MB).
Render-blocking requests
5.2 s25 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.2 s.
Reduce unused CSS
2.5 s · 650 KiBAbout 650 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 49
49/100Your mobile performance score is 49 (desktop: 65). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Improve image delivery
2.0 MB3 images could be 2.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.0 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
300 ms · 569 KiBAbout 569 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Google CDN adds 369 ms
369 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 369 ms of main-thread work and 734 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 360 ms
360 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 360 ms of main-thread work and 362 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.3 s
A phone's processor spends 3.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
14 long tasks on the main thread
14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 209 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
Document request latency
74 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Legacy JavaScript
9 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 184 ms
184 msYour server sent the HTML in 184 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 20.8 s
20.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 20.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.4 s
7.4 sYour largest element takes 7.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We’re pleased to announce that Johns Eastern has rebranded …”.
First Contentful Paint: 5.8 s
5.8 sThe first text or image appears after 5.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 5.8 s
5.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 513 ms
513 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 513 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors
+14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 113 ms to 128 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 128 ms
128 msReal visitors wait 128 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.1 MB in 92 requests
5.1 MBYour homepage downloads 5.1 MB in 92 requests on a phone: images 2.4 MB (13), scripts 1.5 MB (42) and stylesheets 588 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit
1.45 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.45 g of CO₂e: 173.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Positive tabindex
1 element has a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
10 form fields without a label
10 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 2 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
104 internal links, 10 external
The homepage links to 104 pages on johnseastern.com and 10 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “We’re pleased to announce that Johns Eastern has rebranded to Davies”.
Title: 44 characters
Your title is a healthy 44 characters: “Johns Eastern Rebrand - Davies North America”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://davies-group.com/northamerica/johns-eastern-rebrand/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://davies-group.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://davies-group.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (543 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
https://davies-group.com/northamerica/solutions/claims-solutions/claims has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://davies-group.com/northamerica/claims-solutions/field-services/flood and https://davies-group.com/northamerica/claims-solutions/field-services/field-casualty-field use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
4 pages slow to respond
https://davies-group.com/northamerica/solutions/claims-solutions/property-casualty, https://davies-group.com/northamerica/claims-solutions/property-casualty/commercial-property, https://davies-group.com/northamerica/claims-solutions/workers-compensation/bill-review and https://davies-group.com/northamerica/solutions/claims-solutions/field-services took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 94 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
6 small tap targets
6 of 16 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Connecting to 'https://ad.doubleclick.net/ccm/s/collect?auid=1946182285.1793089444>m=45He6an1v9173533369za200zd917353…”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
A 10-field form
Your longest form asks for 10 fields (6 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 300 words of copy
The homepage carries about 300 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Contact” and “Contact Management”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 6 email links.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
20 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 20 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at johnseastern.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- CloudFront
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 34 issues on johnseastern.com, including 19 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.