Website review, no card needed

johnseastern.com logo

johnseastern.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202634 issues · 81 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on johnseastern.com, 13 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.4 s2.7 sMay 9Oct 243.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.8 s
May 16, 20262.8 s
May 23, 20262.9 s
May 30, 20262.8 s
Jun 6, 20262.8 s
Jun 13, 20262.8 s
Jun 20, 20262.9 s
Jun 27, 20262.9 s
Jul 4, 20263.0 s
Jul 11, 20263.1 s
Jul 18, 20263.2 s
Jul 25, 20263.3 s
Aug 1, 20263.2 s
Aug 8, 20263.2 s
Aug 15, 20263.1 s
Aug 22, 20263.0 s
Aug 29, 20263.0 s
Sep 5, 20262.9 s
Sep 12, 20262.9 s
Sep 19, 20262.9 s
Sep 26, 20263.0 s
Oct 3, 20263.0 s
Oct 10, 20263.0 s
Oct 17, 20263.0 s
Oct 24, 20263.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
136 ms109 msMay 9Oct 24128 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026113 ms
May 16, 2026113 ms
May 23, 2026114 ms
May 30, 2026113 ms
Jun 6, 2026112 ms
Jun 13, 2026112 ms
Jun 20, 2026113 ms
Jun 27, 2026115 ms
Jul 4, 2026113 ms
Jul 11, 2026113 ms
Jul 18, 2026114 ms
Jul 25, 2026114 ms
Aug 1, 2026118 ms
Aug 8, 2026122 ms
Aug 15, 2026121 ms
Aug 22, 2026125 ms
Aug 29, 2026128 ms
Sep 5, 2026128 ms
Sep 12, 2026130 ms
Sep 19, 2026130 ms
Sep 26, 2026133 ms
Oct 3, 2026132 ms
Oct 10, 2026130 ms
Oct 17, 2026129 ms
Oct 24, 2026128 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of johnseastern.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. johnseastern.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. johnseastern.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. johnseastern.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. johnseastern.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. johnseastern.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. johnseastern.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. johnseastern.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. johnseastern.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

10 to fix49
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    3.6 s · 3.1 MB

    45 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.1 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    5.2 s

    25 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.2 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    2.5 s · 650 KiB

    About 650 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 49

    49/100

    Your mobile performance score is 49 (desktop: 65). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Improve image delivery

    2.0 MB

    3 images could be 2.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.0 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 569 KiB

    About 569 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google CDN adds 369 ms

    369 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 369 ms of main-thread work and 734 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 360 ms

    360 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 360 ms of main-thread work and 362 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 14 long tasks on the main thread

    14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 209 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Document request latency

    74 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    9 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 184 ms

    184 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 184 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 20.8 s

    20.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 20.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.4 s

    7.4 s

    Your largest element takes 7.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We’re pleased to announce that Johns Eastern has rebranded …”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.8 s

    5.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.8 s

    5.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 513 ms

    513 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 513 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 113 ms to 128 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 128 ms

    128 ms

    Real visitors wait 128 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 5.1 MB in 92 requests

    5.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.1 MB in 92 requests on a phone: images 2.4 MB (13), scripts 1.5 MB (42) and stylesheets 588 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.45 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.45 g of CO₂e: 173.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8895
  • Positive tabindex

    1 element has a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 10 form fields without a label

    10 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 2 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9287
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 104 internal links, 10 external

    The homepage links to 104 pages on johnseastern.com and 10 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “We’re pleased to announce that Johns Eastern has rebranded to Davies”.

  • Title: 44 characters

    Your title is a healthy 44 characters: “Johns Eastern Rebrand - Davies North America”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://davies-group.com/northamerica/johns-eastern-rebrand/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://davies-group.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://davies-group.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (543 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://davies-group.com/northamerica/solutions/claims-solutions/claims has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://davies-group.com/northamerica/claims-solutions/field-services/flood and https://davies-group.com/northamerica/claims-solutions/field-services/field-casualty-field use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 4 pages slow to respond

    https://davies-group.com/northamerica/solutions/claims-solutions/property-casualty, https://davies-group.com/northamerica/claims-solutions/property-casualty/commercial-property, https://davies-group.com/northamerica/claims-solutions/workers-compensation/bill-review and https://davies-group.com/northamerica/solutions/claims-solutions/field-services took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 94 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9287
  • 6 small tap targets

    6 of 16 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Connecting to 'https://ad.doubleclick.net/ccm/s/collect?auid=1946182285.1793089444&gtm=45He6an1v9173533369za200zd917353…”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • A 10-field form

    Your longest form asks for 10 fields (6 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 300 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 300 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Contact” and “Contact Management”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 6 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 20 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 20 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at johnseastern.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
CloudFront

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on johnseastern.com, including 19 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25