jointhebibleproject.com website review

About 367 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

77 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (319 KiB).

21 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.

Your mobile performance score is 71. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

14 images could be 424 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

42 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics CMP and New Relic and others), adding 1.0 MB and 232 ms of main-thread time.

imagekit.io costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 679 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 98 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

About 14 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

Your largest element takes 10.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “The BibleProject website uses cookies to provide our servic…”.

The page becomes fully interactive after 10.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

Visually, the page fills in at 4.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 154 ms to 160 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.49 g of CO₂e: 58.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

Links must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

Your <h1> is empty.

The homepage links to 38 pages on jointhebibleproject.com and 11 external pages.

There is no https://bibleproject.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

https://bibleproject.com/collections is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

https://bibleproject.com/ko and https://bibleproject.com/zh-hans all use the title “BibleProject”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

https://bibleproject.com/collections, https://bibleproject.com/articles, https://bibleproject.com/bible/nasb/genesis/1 and https://bibleproject.com/de have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

https://bibleproject.com/guides, https://bibleproject.com/pt-br and https://bibleproject.com/de have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

https://bibleproject.com/de took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 28 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

The homepage has only about 165 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Usercentrics) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.