Website review, no card needed

joloves.com logo

joloves.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202647 issues · 89 checks

This review found 47 issues worth fixing on joloves.com, 20 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: minmaxify.com adds 8.5 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s2.5 sMay 23Nov 72.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20262.6 s
May 30, 20262.5 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.6 s
Jun 20, 20262.7 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20262.7 s
Jul 11, 20262.8 s
Jul 18, 20262.8 s
Jul 25, 20262.8 s
Aug 1, 20262.7 s
Aug 8, 20262.6 s
Aug 15, 20262.5 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.6 s
Sep 26, 20262.5 s
Oct 3, 20262.5 s
Oct 10, 20262.6 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Oct 24, 20262.6 s
Oct 31, 20262.6 s
Nov 7, 20262.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
303 ms208 msMay 23Nov 7235 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026268 ms
May 30, 2026276 ms
Jun 6, 2026292 ms
Jun 13, 2026287 ms
Jun 20, 2026291 ms
Jun 27, 2026288 ms
Jul 4, 2026278 ms
Jul 11, 2026279 ms
Jul 18, 2026280 ms
Jul 25, 2026277 ms
Aug 1, 2026283 ms
Aug 8, 2026279 ms
Aug 15, 2026269 ms
Aug 22, 2026254 ms
Aug 29, 2026254 ms
Sep 5, 2026245 ms
Sep 12, 2026247 ms
Sep 19, 2026251 ms
Sep 26, 2026240 ms
Oct 3, 2026229 ms
Oct 10, 2026221 ms
Oct 17, 2026219 ms
Oct 24, 2026221 ms
Oct 31, 2026233 ms
Nov 7, 2026235 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of joloves.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. joloves.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  2. joloves.com at 5.4 s5.4 s
  3. joloves.com at 8.2 s8.2 s
  4. joloves.com at 10.9 s10.9 s
  5. joloves.com at 13.6 s13.6 s
  6. joloves.com at 16.3 s16.3 s
  7. joloves.com at 19.0 s19.0 s
  8. joloves.com at 21.8 s21.8 s

Speed

14 to fix32
  • minmaxify.com adds 8.5 s

    8.5 s

    minmaxify.com costs a phone 8.5 s of main-thread work and 12 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 s · 6.7 MB

    55 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (6.7 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.3 s · 1.5 MB

    About 1.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 30.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 30.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 20.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Shopify adds 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Shopify costs a phone 1.5 s of main-thread work and 663 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 12,635 HTML elements

    The page has 12,635 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Mobile performance score: 32

    32/100

    Your mobile performance score is 32. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (minmaxify.com, Shopify and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 2.3 MB and 12.3 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    5.5 MB

    12 images could be 5.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 818 ms

    818 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 818 ms of main-thread work and 565 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 684 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Render-blocking requests

    550 ms

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 550 ms.

  • Yotpo adds 326 ms

    326 ms

    Yotpo costs a phone 326 ms of main-thread work and 297 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Hotjar adds 319 ms

    319 ms

    Hotjar costs a phone 319 ms of main-thread work and 280 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 95 KiB

    About 95 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 37 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 37 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    27 KiB

    27 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 93 ms

    93 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 93 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 29.3 s

    29.3 s

    Your largest element takes 29.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We use cookies and similar technologies, both first-party a…”.

  • Speed Index: 23.6 s

    23.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 23.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 73.0 s

    73.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 73.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.9 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user INP: 316 ms

    316 ms

    Real visitors wait 316 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 15 images without width and height

    15 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 457 ms

    457 ms

    Real visitors wait 457 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 14% faster for real visitors

    -14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 268 ms to 235 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix35
  • Page weight: 30.7 MB in 446 requests

    30.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 30.7 MB in 446 requests on a phone: images 15.2 MB (73), other files 7.2 MB (216) and media 4.3 MB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 24 images far larger than shown

    5.4 MB

    24 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example JL_Pomelo-Cracker-Packshot-_2.png at 2,000 px wide, shown at 66 px. Resized copies would save about 5.4 MB.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    JL_20200316_LIFE__JBJL_EDT_PDP_MAIN.jpg weighs 1.0 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • About 8.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    8.71 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 8.71 g of CO₂e: 1045.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 7491
  • 4 buttons without a name

    4 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 4 text elements with low contrast

    4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (8 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 14 form fields without a label

    14 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" do not have accessible names.

    Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" do not have accessible names. (1 element).

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 7769
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (24 characters)

    Your title is only 24 characters: “Jo Loves - Official Site”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (314 characters)

    Your meta description is 314 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 4 links crawlers can't follow

    4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 324 internal links, 2 external

    The homepage links to 324 pages on joloves.com and 2 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.joloves.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.joloves.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,914 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.joloves.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 98 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

1 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

Best practices

5 to fixGoogle 5469
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=211022170&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=be64abaa-4b67-49bc-a0b4-85b2a94e01a5&bo=2&sid=3e6b25f0dde511f1b8a0634c627d5e57&vid=3e6b1750dde511f180b755dbbca1984f&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=9.

  • 9 small tap targets

    9 of 41 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 4 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 817 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 817 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “shop now”.

  • 10 calls to action

    The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Subscribe & Save”, “No.42 The Flower Shop” and “Shop Fragrance”.

  • 86 short forms

    86 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 2 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 10 trackers load before any consent

    10

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 27 cookies set on arrival

    27

    Opening the homepage sets 27 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 59 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 59 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at joloves.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 15 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Onetrust Consent Management · Elevar Conversion Tracking · Klevu Ai Search Discovery · Yotpo Loyalty Rewards · Minmaxify Order Limits · Yotpo Product Reviews · Wingify · Hulk Ai Wishlist Favorites · My Wishlist Share Remind · Countdown Timer · Event Promotion Bar · Digital Appointments · cloudfront.net · hextom.com · bogos.io

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 47 issues on joloves.com, including 22 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25