Website review, no card needed
jotis.gr website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202645 issues · 82 checks
This review found 45 issues worth fixing on jotis.gr, 17 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
67DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 96 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 96 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 96 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 95 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 96 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
5.3 s · 3.4 MB19 images could be 3.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.3 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.5 s33 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.5 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.1 s · 783 KiB71 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (783 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 66
66/100Your mobile performance score is 66 (desktop: 52). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
470 ms · 160 KiBAbout 160 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 470 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
450 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 450 ms).
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (Cookiebot, Google Maps and Google CDN and others), adding 844 KiB and 165 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
160 ms · 46 KiBAbout 46 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 160 ms faster on a phone.
1 long task on the main thread
1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 52 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
15 KiB15 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.5 s
A phone's processor spends 0.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 202 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 110 ms
110 msYour server sent the HTML in 110 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.26
0.26For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.26 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 11.4 s
11.4 sYour largest element takes 11.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Χρησιμοποιούμε cookie για την εξατομίκευση περιεχομένου και…”.
Time to Interactive: 11.4 s
11.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 11.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.5 s
3.5 sThe first text or image appears after 3.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.3 s
3.3 sReal visitors wait 3.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 41% slower for real visitors
+41%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 4.5 s
4.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 4.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
19 images without width and height
19 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
0%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 96 ms to 96 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 99 ms
99 msReal visitors wait 99 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.004
0.004The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.004, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 2 ms
2 msScripts block the page for only 2 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.8 MB in 87 requests
4.8 MBYour homepage downloads 4.8 MB in 87 requests on a phone: images 3.6 MB (21), scripts 914 KiB (48) and fonts 204 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
12 images far larger than shown
2.7 MB12 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 75a242750762456bdbfa0174569d7815.png at 730 px wide, shown at 90 px. Resized copies would save about 2.7 MB.
18 images in older formats
18 images (3.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
13 images below the first screen load straight away
13 images further down the page (2.3 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit
1.35 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.35 g of CO₂e: 162.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (10 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 19 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 5 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (22 characters)
Your title is only 22 characters: “ΓΙΩΤΗΣ Α.Ε. - jotis.gr”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
Meta description is long (195 characters)
Your meta description is 195 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:title and og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
185 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 185 pages on jotis.gr and 8 external pages.
2 checks passed
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.jotis.gr/Tools/GoogleSitemap.php.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.jotis.gr/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
1 linked page is broken
Your homepage links to https://www.jotis.gr/3/el/Axies, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.
4 pages without a meta description
https://www.jotis.gr/en, https://www.jotis.gr/2/el/Orama, https://www.jotis.gr/245/el/Ereunitika-programmata and https://www.jotis.gr/250/el/-Hellenic-Research-and-Innovation-Center have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.jotis.gr/224/Epikoinonia, whose canonical is https://www.jotis.gr/224/el/Epikoinonia. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page without an H1
https://www.jotis.gr/en has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
12 pages with very little text
https://www.jotis.gr/224/Epikoinonia, https://www.jotis.gr/15/el/Etairia, https://www.jotis.gr/2/el/Orama, https://www.jotis.gr/26/el/Stoxoi--Prooptiki, https://www.jotis.gr/8/el/Ereuna-and-Anaptuxi and https://www.jotis.gr/245/el/Ereunitika-programmata and 6 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
1 page slow to respond
https://www.jotis.gr/250/el/-Hellenic-Research-and-Innovation-Center took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 98 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
11 small tap targets
11 of 51 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 39 words
The homepage has only about 39 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).
12 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at jotis.gr, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2018.
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
Hiring
- Hiring
- 8 open roles
- Teams
- STAMOU (5), Finance Department (1), Manufacturing (1)
- Job board
- workable
- Careers page
- apply.workable.com/jotis (opens in a new tab)
Company
- Founded
- 1930
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 45 issues on jotis.gr, including 17 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.