Website review, no card needed

julienarcin.com logo

julienarcin.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202634 issues · 95 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on julienarcin.com, 12 of them high impact, across 95 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.4 s2.0 sMay 16Oct 312.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.1 s
May 23, 20262.1 s
May 30, 20262.1 s
Jun 6, 20262.2 s
Jun 13, 20262.2 s
Jun 20, 20262.2 s
Jun 27, 20262.2 s
Jul 4, 20262.2 s
Jul 11, 20262.2 s
Jul 18, 20262.2 s
Jul 25, 20262.2 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.2 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.2 s
Sep 12, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Oct 10, 20262.3 s
Oct 17, 20262.4 s
Oct 24, 20262.4 s
Oct 31, 20262.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
266 ms233 msMay 16Oct 31255 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026237 ms
May 23, 2026241 ms
May 30, 2026242 ms
Jun 6, 2026243 ms
Jun 13, 2026245 ms
Jun 20, 2026245 ms
Jun 27, 2026247 ms
Jul 4, 2026248 ms
Jul 11, 2026248 ms
Jul 18, 2026248 ms
Jul 25, 2026247 ms
Aug 1, 2026246 ms
Aug 8, 2026244 ms
Aug 15, 2026243 ms
Aug 22, 2026243 ms
Aug 29, 2026246 ms
Sep 5, 2026252 ms
Sep 12, 2026257 ms
Sep 19, 2026261 ms
Sep 26, 2026262 ms
Oct 3, 2026262 ms
Oct 10, 2026262 ms
Oct 17, 2026262 ms
Oct 24, 2026261 ms
Oct 31, 2026255 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of julienarcin.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. julienarcin.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. julienarcin.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. julienarcin.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. julienarcin.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. julienarcin.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. julienarcin.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. julienarcin.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. julienarcin.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

julienarcin.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

8 to fix60
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.3 s · 448 KiB

    About 448 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.9 s

    17 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.0 s · 201 KiB

    About 201 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 60

    60/100

    Your mobile performance score is 60. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (githubassets.com), adding 1.8 MB and 305 ms of main-thread time.

  • githubassets.com adds 305 ms

    305 ms

    githubassets.com costs a phone 305 ms of main-thread work and 1.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    453 KiB

    7 images could be 453 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 2,639 HTML elements

    The page has 2,639 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    150 ms · 15 KiB

    15 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 119 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    41 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (41 KiB).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 462 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 21 ms

    21 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 21 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.0 s

    10.0 s

    Your largest element takes 10.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Hi there, I'm Julien”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.5 s

    4.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 10.2 s

    10.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 10.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 5.9 s

    5.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user INP: 250 ms

    250 ms

    Real visitors wait 250 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 6 images without width and height

    6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 237 ms to 255 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 13% slower for real visitors

    +13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.06

    0.06

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.06 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 117 ms

    117 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 117 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix90
  • 10 images in older formats

    10 images (619 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.55 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.55 g of CO₂e: 65.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.9 MB in 89 requests

    1.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.9 MB in 89 requests on a phone: scripts 890 KiB (44), images 738 KiB (16) and stylesheets 275 KiB (21). That is a lean page.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

1 to fixGoogle 9598
  • 5 tap targets too small

    5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • <td> elements in a large <table> do not have table headers.

    <td> elements in a large <table> do not have table headers. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 25 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10091
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 3 H1 headlines

    There are 3 <h1> headlines (“Julien Arcin julienarcin”, “Block or report julienarcin” and “Hi there, I'm Julien”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 92 internal links, 26 external

    The homepage links to 92 pages on julienarcin.com and 26 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 93 characters

    Your meta description is 93 characters: “Co-founder @ scrap.io. julienarcin has 6 repositories available. Follow their code on GitHub.”.

  • Title: 35 characters

    Your title is a healthy 35 characters: “julienarcin (Julien Arcin) · GitHub”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://github.com/julienarcin.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://github.com/sitemap_marketing.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix60
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • Parts of the site are closed to 6 AI crawlers

    Your robots.txt lets ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User), Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.

1 checks passed
  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (28 KiB, 117 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix98
  • 4 pages share a meta description

    /security/advanced-security/code-security, /security/advanced-security/secret-protection, /trending and /resources/articles use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 42 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9691
  • 21 small tap targets

    21 of 42 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 6 distorted images

    6 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • 1 broken external link

    1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://www.linkedin.com/in/julien-arcin/ (999).

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (github.com).

  • Valid certificate (80 days left)

    The certificate from Sectigo Limited · Sectigo Public Server Authentication CA DV E36 verifies for julienarcin.com and is valid for another 80 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://julienarcin.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • security.txt published

    A security.txt file tells researchers how to report a problem with your site.

Domain and trust

  • DNSSEC is off

    github.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 19 years old

    19 years

    github.com was registered in Oct 2007 through MarkMonitor Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only sectigo.com, digicert.com, globalsign.com and letsencrypt.org to issue certificates for github.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

  • Registered until Oct 2028

    github.com is registered until Oct 2028.

Content and conversion

4 to fix64
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 139 words

    The homepage has only about 139 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

3 checks passed
  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Pricing”, “Sign up” and “contact support”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: a star rating and 12 trust badges.

Email authentication

3 to fix0
  • No DMARC policy

    julienarcin.com has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.

  • No SPF record

    julienarcin.com has no SPF record, so mail servers can't tell which servers may send email as you. Your mail lands in spam more often, and anyone can send mail pretending to be you.

  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 0/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

Privacy and tracking

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Framework
React
Hosting
GitHub Pages

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on julienarcin.com, including 17 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25