Website review, no card needed

juxtapositionarts.org logo

juxtapositionarts.org website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202633 issues · 78 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on juxtapositionarts.org, 10 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Full-page screenshot of juxtapositionarts.org (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. juxtapositionarts.org at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. juxtapositionarts.org at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. juxtapositionarts.org at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. juxtapositionarts.org at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. juxtapositionarts.org at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. juxtapositionarts.org at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. juxtapositionarts.org at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. juxtapositionarts.org at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

10 to fix48
  • Improve image delivery

    20.1 s · 12.5 MB

    6 images could be 12.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 20.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.6 s

    12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 48

    48/100

    Your mobile performance score is 48 (desktop: 74). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 1.1 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    470 ms · 579 KiB

    About 579 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 470 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google CDN adds 864 ms

    864 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 864 ms of main-thread work and 731 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    160 ms · 405 KiB

    405 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 413 ms

    413 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 413 ms of main-thread work and 289 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 299 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    250 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 250 ms).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    62 KiB

    About 62 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 74 but mobile only 48. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    7 KiB

    7 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix44
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 27.0 s

    27.0 s

    Your largest element takes 27.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “A overhead shot of the JXTA Flag on JXTA's campus”.

  • Time to Interactive: 34.9 s

    34.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 34.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 892 ms

    892 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 892 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 4.9 s

    4.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 7 images without width and height

    7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

1 checks passed
  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.005

    0.005

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.005, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 37.5 MB in 50 requests

    37.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 37.5 MB in 50 requests on a phone: media 22.0 MB (2), images 13.5 MB (8) and scripts 1.5 MB (19). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 6 images over 500 KB

    6 images weigh 13.2 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 6 images far larger than shown

    7.7 MB

    6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Website-images-5-scaled-e1778080480595.png at 2,560 px wide, shown at 340 px. Resized copies would save about 7.7 MB.

  • 7 images in older formats

    7 images (13.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 6 images below the first screen load straight away

    6 images further down the page (12.7 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 10.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    10.64 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 10.64 g of CO₂e: 1276.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9898
  • Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 8 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9290
  • Title is long (71 characters)

    Your title is 71 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Juxtaposition Arts | Teen-Staffed Art & Design Center in N. Minneapolis”.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 51 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 51 pages on juxtapositionarts.org and 9 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 143 characters

    Your meta description is 143 characters: “Juxtaposition Arts is a non-profit youth art and design education center, gallery, retail shop, and artists’ studio spa…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Juxtaposition Arts”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://juxtapositionarts.org/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: WebPage.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://juxtapositionarts.org/wp-sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://juxtapositionarts.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (381 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 4 pages share a meta description

    https://juxtapositionarts.org/about/portfolio, https://juxtapositionarts.org/hire/contemporary-arts-services, https://juxtapositionarts.org/donate/ways-to-donate and https://juxtapositionarts.org/financials-annual-report use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://juxtapositionarts.org/donate/ways-to-donate and https://juxtapositionarts.org/financials-annual-report have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 28 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 1 small tap target

    1 of 5 tappable elements near the top of the page is smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix86
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 4 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 303 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 303 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “LEARN MORE”.

  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “JOIN OUR TEAM”, “Contact” and “Contact Us”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (3 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 8 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at juxtapositionarts.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on juxtapositionarts.org, including 16 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25