Website review, no card needed

jvm.ch logo

jvm.ch website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202626 issues · 73 checks

This review found 26 issues worth fixing on jvm.ch, 9 of them high impact, across 73 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.4 s505 msMay 2Oct 17699 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 2026734 ms
May 9, 2026852 ms
May 16, 2026980 ms
May 23, 2026980 ms
May 30, 2026837 ms
Jun 6, 2026701 ms
Jun 13, 2026607 ms
Jun 20, 2026615 ms
Jun 27, 2026618 ms
Jul 4, 2026633 ms
Jul 11, 2026801 ms
Jul 18, 2026789 ms
Jul 25, 2026835 ms
Aug 1, 2026878 ms
Aug 8, 2026927 ms
Aug 15, 2026971 ms
Aug 22, 20261.1 s
Aug 29, 20261.2 s
Sep 5, 20261.3 s
Sep 12, 20261.1 s
Sep 19, 2026906 ms
Sep 26, 2026945 ms
Oct 3, 2026753 ms
Oct 10, 2026659 ms
Oct 17, 2026699 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
128 ms108 msMay 2Oct 10126 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026110 ms
Jun 6, 2026113 ms
Jun 20, 2026113 ms
Jun 27, 2026113 ms
Jul 4, 2026120 ms
Sep 12, 2026122 ms
Sep 19, 2026126 ms
Oct 10, 2026126 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of jvm.ch (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. jvm.ch at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. jvm.ch at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. jvm.ch at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. jvm.ch at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. jvm.ch at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. jvm.ch at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. jvm.ch at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. jvm.ch at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

8 to fix46
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.5 s · 689 KiB

    About 689 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    1.1 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.1 s).

  • Mobile performance score: 46

    46/100

    Your mobile performance score is 46 (desktop: 45). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Facebook and others), adding 1.7 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    600 ms · 377 KiB

    11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (377 KiB).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 489 ms

    489 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 489 ms of main-thread work and 546 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 417 ms

    417 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 417 ms of main-thread work and 739 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 16 long tasks on the main thread

    16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 226 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Render-blocking requests

    150 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    53 KiB

    About 53 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.9 s

    7.9 s

    Your largest element takes 7.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 16.8 s

    16.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.7 s

    3.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 736 ms

    736 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 736 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.4 s

    5.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 13% slower for real visitors

    +13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 110 ms to 126 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 0.7 s

    0.7 s

    Real visitors wait 0.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.5 s

    0.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 306 ms

    306 ms

    Real visitors wait 306 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 14% faster for real visitors

    -14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.7 s to 0.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.4 MB in 62 requests

    2.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.4 MB in 62 requests on a phone: scripts 1.7 MB (21), other files 371 KiB (24) and fonts 176 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.67 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.67 g of CO₂e: 80.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 10098
  • 4 form fields without a label

    4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 9 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 1 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

Google 100100
  • 14 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 14 pages on jvm.ch and 8 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 140 characters

    Your meta description is 140 characters: “Jung von Matt ist die kreativste Agenturgruppe der Schweiz. Wir lieben Ideen, die inspirieren und schaffen Momentum für…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Jung von Matt”.

  • Title: 64 characters

    Your title is a healthy 64 characters: “Jung von Matt Schweiz - die kreativste Agenturgruppe der Schweiz”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.jvm.ch/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.jvm.ch/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.jvm.ch/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://www.jvm.ch/de/datenschutz is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.jvm.ch/de/impressum and https://www.jvm.ch/de/datenschutz have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.jvm.ch/de/arbeiten has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 8 internal pages checked

    We fetched 8 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 8 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has a title

    All 8 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 7 small tap targets

    7 of 12 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix64
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Only about 115 words

    The homepage has only about 115 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

4 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “[email protected]”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (4 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 5 phone links and 4 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 12 cookies set on arrival

    12

    Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 27 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 27 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner

    A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at jvm.ch, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Company

Employees
797
Founded
1991
Headquarters
Hamburg

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 26 issues on jvm.ch, including 14 speed issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25