Website review, no card needed

jvajva.com logo

jvajva.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202636 issues · 78 checks

This review found 36 issues worth fixing on jvajva.com, 14 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Full-page screenshot of jvajva.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. jvajva.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. jvajva.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  3. jvajva.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  4. jvajva.com at 3.7 s3.7 s
  5. jvajva.com at 4.6 s4.6 s
  6. jvajva.com at 5.5 s5.5 s
  7. jvajva.com at 6.5 s6.5 s
  8. jvajva.com at 7.4 s7.4 s

Speed

10 to fix49
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    34.5 s · 18.4 MB

    139 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (18.4 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    12.8 s

    52 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 12.8 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    10.2 s · 1.8 MB

    About 1.8 MB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 10.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 49

    49/100

    Your mobile performance score is 49 (desktop: 50). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Improve image delivery

    200 ms · 3.8 MB

    10 images could be 3.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    160 ms · 1.0 MB

    About 1.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 160 ms faster on a phone.

  • 14 long tasks on the main thread

    14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 444 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    310 ms · 37 KiB

    37 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • 1,563 HTML elements

    The page has 1,563 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Accessibe Accessibility Overlay and Google Fonts and others), adding 536 KiB and 418 ms of main-thread time.

  • Font display

    250 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 250 ms).

  • Document request latency

    244 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    200 ms · 29 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 29 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    42 KiB

    42 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 120 ms

    120 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 120 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix60
  • First Contentful Paint: 15.3 s

    15.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 15.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 70.3 s

    70.3 s

    Your largest element takes 70.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Mt. CB WTP Expansion”.

  • Speed Index: 16.8 s

    16.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 16.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 73.2 s

    73.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 73.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 286 ms

    286 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 286 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

1 checks passed
  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.004

    0.004

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.004, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 19.5 MB in 148 requests

    19.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 19.5 MB in 148 requests on a phone: images 14.4 MB (20), scripts 2.2 MB (60) and stylesheets 2.2 MB (56). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (243 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 5.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    5.52 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.52 g of CO₂e: 663.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 9091
  • 13 text elements with low contrast

    13 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 10 tap targets too small

    10 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (2 elements)

    Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 10 links without text

    10 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 18 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9283
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Meta description is long (191 characters)

    Your meta description is 191 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 178 internal links, 10 external

    The homepage links to 178 pages on jvajva.com and 10 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Title: 31 characters

    Your title is a healthy 31 characters: “Home - JVA Consulting Engineers”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://jvajva.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://jvajva.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://jvajva.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,134 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix85
  • 15 pages without a meta description

    https://jvajva.com/about, https://jvajva.com/services/structural, https://jvajva.com/services/civil, https://jvajva.com/services/environmental, https://jvajva.com/project-category/k-12-higher-education-facilities and https://jvajva.com/project-category/municipal-state-services and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://jvajva.com/project-category/historic-existing, whose canonical is https://jvajva.com/project-category/historic-preservation-forensic-engineering. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 12 pages without an H1

    https://jvajva.com/services/environmental, https://jvajva.com/project-category/k-12-higher-education-facilities, https://jvajva.com/project-category/municipal-state-services, https://jvajva.com/project-category/federal-services, https://jvajva.com/project-category/historic-existing and https://jvajva.com/project-category/municipal-infrastructure and 6 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 47 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9287
  • 9 small tap targets

    9 of 26 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Not Found)”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,506 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,506 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Contact” and “Learn More”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 30 testimonial or review blocks and 1 customer or partner logo.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 6 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at jvajva.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Liquid Web

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 36 issues on jvajva.com, including 15 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25