Website review, no card needed

kare11.com logo

kare11.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 October 202651 issues · 102 checks

This review found 51 issues worth fixing on kare11.com, 22 of them high impact, across 102 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.7 s1.4 sApr 18Oct 31.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20261.6 s
Apr 25, 20261.7 s
May 2, 20261.6 s
May 9, 20261.6 s
May 16, 20261.6 s
May 23, 20261.6 s
May 30, 20261.7 s
Jun 6, 20261.7 s
Jun 13, 20261.7 s
Jun 20, 20261.6 s
Jun 27, 20261.6 s
Jul 4, 20261.6 s
Jul 11, 20261.7 s
Jul 18, 20261.6 s
Jul 25, 20261.6 s
Aug 1, 20261.6 s
Aug 8, 20261.6 s
Aug 15, 20261.6 s
Aug 22, 20261.6 s
Aug 29, 20261.6 s
Sep 5, 20261.6 s
Sep 12, 20261.6 s
Sep 19, 20261.5 s
Sep 26, 20261.5 s
Oct 3, 20261.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
207 ms154 msApr 18Oct 3196 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026160 ms
Apr 25, 2026170 ms
May 2, 2026176 ms
May 9, 2026178 ms
May 16, 2026181 ms
May 23, 2026179 ms
May 30, 2026183 ms
Jun 6, 2026192 ms
Jun 13, 2026194 ms
Jun 20, 2026194 ms
Jun 27, 2026193 ms
Jul 4, 2026187 ms
Jul 11, 2026192 ms
Jul 18, 2026196 ms
Jul 25, 2026195 ms
Aug 1, 2026196 ms
Aug 8, 2026195 ms
Aug 15, 2026192 ms
Aug 22, 2026195 ms
Aug 29, 2026196 ms
Sep 5, 2026197 ms
Sep 12, 2026201 ms
Sep 19, 2026196 ms
Sep 26, 2026196 ms
Oct 3, 2026196 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of kare11.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. kare11.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  2. kare11.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  3. kare11.com at 4.8 s4.8 s
  4. kare11.com at 6.4 s6.4 s
  5. kare11.com at 8.0 s8.0 s
  6. kare11.com at 9.7 s9.7 s
  7. kare11.com at 11.3 s11.3 s
  8. kare11.com at 12.9 s12.9 s

Speed

15 to fix33
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.4 s · 2.3 MB

    271 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.3 MB).

  • Main-thread work: 24.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 24.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 15.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.8 s

    12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 33

    33/100

    Your mobile performance score is 33. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Taboola and others), adding 4.3 MB and 4.4 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    600 ms · 2.1 MB

    About 2.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    900 ms · 561 KiB

    12 images could be 561 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google CDN adds 846 ms

    846 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 846 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Taboola adds 788 ms

    788 ms

    Taboola costs a phone 788 ms of main-thread work and 1.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 858 ms

    858 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 858 ms of main-thread work and 596 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 609 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 486 ms

    486 ms

    Google/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 486 ms of main-thread work and 452 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Pubmatic adds 435 ms

    435 ms

    Pubmatic costs a phone 435 ms of main-thread work and 149 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    300 ms · 62 KiB

    62 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • 1,806 HTML elements

    The page has 1,806 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 192 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 192 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    66 KiB

    About 66 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 152 ms

    152 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 152 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.1 s

    11.1 s

    Your largest element takes 11.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 22.5 s

    22.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 22.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 73.9 s

    73.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 73.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 4.3 s

    4.3 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 4.3 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 53 images without width and height

    53 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 19% slower for real visitors

    +19%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 160 ms to 196 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 189 ms

    189 ms

    Real visitors wait 189 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.07

    0.07

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 434 ms

    434 ms

    Real visitors wait 434 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 10% faster for real visitors

    -10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.028

    0.028

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.028, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 10.0 MB in 1,403 requests

    10.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 10.0 MB in 1,403 requests on a phone: scripts 5.4 MB (149), images 3.0 MB (408) and other files 903 KiB (717). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 24 images far larger than shown

    5.1 MB

    24 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example a2f466a6-694e-4d4f-b317-7959e390e047_1920x1080.jpg at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 5.1 MB.

  • 6 images over 500 KB

    6 images weigh 3.4 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 34 images in older formats

    34 images (8.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 26 images below the first screen load straight away

    26 images further down the page (7.4 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.83 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.83 g of CO₂e: 339.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

13 to fixGoogle 7384
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Hidden but focusable

    12 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • ARIA commands must have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Positive tabindex

    1 element has a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.

  • 9 images without alt text

    9 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 12 links without text

    12 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h1 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 54 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 66 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 54 passed and 12 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 6985
  • Title is long (89 characters)

    Your title is 89 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Minneapolis St. Paul News, Weather, Traffic, Sports | Minneapolis, Minnesota | kare11.com”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 3 links crawlers can't follow

    3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:title and og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 156 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 156 pages on kare11.com and 5 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 97 characters

    Your meta description is 97 characters: “KARE11.com is your leader for local news, weather, traffic and sports for Twin Cities metro area.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Minneapolis St. Paul News, Weather, Traffic, Sports | Minneapolis, Minnesota”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.kare11.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.kare11.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.kare11.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,143 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 96 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    13 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 13 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 3186
  • 31 third-party cookies

    31 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“The Topics API is deprecated and will be removed in a future release.”).

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 12 distorted images

    12 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    18 of 19 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,673 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,673 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Try Again” and “Contact Us”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 12 trackers load before any consent

    12

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Comscore, Criteo, Google Ads and Google Analytics and 7 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 29 cookies set on arrival

    29

    Opening the homepage sets 29 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 75 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 75 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kare11.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 51 issues on kare11.com, including 21 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25