Website review, no card needed
karrda.gov.sa website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202631 issues · 64 checks
This review found 31 issues worth fixing on karrda.gov.sa, 18 of them high impact, across 64 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
69DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 129 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 139 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 146 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 169 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 125 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.8 s
3.6 s
5.4 s
7.3 s
9.1 s
10.9 s
12.7 s
14.5 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
7.7 s · 7.6 MB36 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (7.6 MB).
Improve image delivery
1.0 s · 5.7 MB11 images could be 5.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.0 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.2 s1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 3.2 s.
Reduce unused CSS
2.5 s · 406 KiBAbout 406 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.8 s · 339 KiBAbout 339 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 58
58/100Your mobile performance score is 58 (desktop: 59). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
openwidget.com adds 53 ms
53 msopenwidget.com costs a phone 53 ms of main-thread work and 338 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
3 third-party services on the page
3 third-party services load with your homepage (userway.org, openwidget.com and Cloudflare CDN), adding 533 KiB and 140 ms of main-thread time.
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 83 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
11 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.9 s
A phone's processor spends 1.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 640 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 1 ms
1 msYour server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 13.6 s
13.6 sYour largest element takes 13.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below. Most of its time is resource load duration (6.5 s).
Speed Index: 19.2 s
19.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 19.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 24.0 s
24.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.8 s
3.8 sThe first text or image appears after 3.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 866 ms
866 msReal visitors wait 866 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
13 images without width and height
13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 129 ms to 125 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 128 ms
128 msReal visitors wait 128 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.029
0.029The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.029, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 20 ms
20 msScripts block the page for only 20 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 8.2 MB in 80 requests
8.2 MBYour homepage downloads 8.2 MB in 80 requests on a phone: images 6.2 MB (28), scripts 1.1 MB (24) and stylesheets 450 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 1.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
4 images far larger than shown
1.4 MB4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example menu-DheRTfaJ.png at 1,024 px wide, shown at 50 px. Resized copies would save about 1.4 MB.
3 images in older formats
3 images (1.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (70 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.3 g of CO₂ per visit
2.33 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.33 g of CO₂e: 280.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Not measured in this review.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Meta description is long (181 characters)
Your meta description is 181 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://dev.karrda.gov.sa/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
5 checks passed
Title: 60 characters
Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “محمية الملك عبدالعزيز الملكية | King Abdulaziz Royal Reserve”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://karrda.gov.sa/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: GovernmentOrganization.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://karrda.gov.sa/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://karrda.gov.sa/theme-images/default-imgs/hero-img.png.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
16 of 16 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 15 words
The homepage has only about 15 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
1 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
6 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at karrda.gov.sa, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Bootstrap
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 31 issues on karrda.gov.sa, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.