Website review, no card needed
kayak.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202643 issues · 90 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on kayak.com, 20 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
Read the full growth playbook for KAYAK
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
63DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 320 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 314 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 311 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 307 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 312 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 315 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 320 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 320 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 317 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 317 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 320 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 325 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 329 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 328 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 325 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 321 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 315 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 311 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 304 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 295 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 288 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 283 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 279 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 281 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 282 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.3 s · 1.5 MBAbout 1.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.3 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.4 s53 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.4 s.
r9cdn.net adds 1.7 s
1.7 sr9cdn.net costs a phone 1.7 s of main-thread work and 4.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 12.0 s
A phone's processor spends 12.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 28
28/100Your mobile performance score is 28 (desktop: 37). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
3,470 HTML elements
The page has 3,470 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (r9cdn.net, Google Tag Manager and Google/Doubleclick Ads and others), adding 5.8 MB and 3.3 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 920 ms
920 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 920 ms of main-thread work and 826 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
760 ms · 120 KiBAbout 120 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 760 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 614 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 256 ms
256 msGoogle/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 256 ms of main-thread work and 361 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
74 KiB14 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (74 KiB).
Improve image delivery
44 KiB4 images could be 44 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 50 ms
50 msYour server sent the HTML in 50 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.26
0.26For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.26 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 11.9 s
11.9 sThe first text or image appears after 11.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 16.5 s
16.5 sYour largest element takes 16.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Our app can save you more.”.
Time to Interactive: 39.0 s
39.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 39.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 15.3 s
15.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 15.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.9 s
1.9 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.9 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 2.8 s
2.8 sReal visitors wait 2.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 288 ms
288 msReal visitors wait 288 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 957 ms
957 msReal visitors wait 957 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
5 images without width and height
5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.1 s to 3.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 11% faster for real visitors
-11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 320 ms to 282 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.5 MB in 450 requests
6.5 MBYour homepage downloads 6.5 MB in 450 requests on a phone: scripts 3.8 MB (202), images 1.8 MB (47) and stylesheets 314 KiB (97). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit
1.83 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.83 g of CO₂e: 220.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Interactive controls must not be nested (2 elements)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 6 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
53 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 63 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 53 passed and 10 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
473 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 473 pages on kayak.com and 7 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 148 characters
Your meta description is 148 characters: “KAYAK searches hundreds of other travel sites at once to find the information you need to make the right decisions on f…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Search Flights, Hotels & Rental Cars”.
Title: 44 characters
Your title is a healthy 44 characters: “Search Flights, Hotels & Rental Cars | KAYAK”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.kayak.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: FAQPage, Organization and Website.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.kayak.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Parts of the site are closed to 1 AI crawler
Your robots.txt lets ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
2 checks passed
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,747 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.kayak.com/llms.txt (7 KiB, 45 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.kayak.com/ai is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
3 pages without an H1
https://www.kayak.com/ai, https://www.kayak.com/explore and https://www.kayak.com/news have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
https://www.kayak.com/explore has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 199 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “The Content Security Policy directive 'upgrade-insecure-requests' is ignored when delivered in a report-only policy.”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
43 of 49 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 518 words of copy
The homepage carries about 518 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Download on the App Store” and “Subscribe on YouTube”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
11 trackers load before any consent
11Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel and 6 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
27 cookies set on arrival
27Opening the homepage sets 27 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
41 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 41 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kayak.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on kayak.com, including 22 speed issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.