Website review, no card needed

kems.net logo

kems.net website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202633 issues · 77 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on kems.net, 14 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.9 s2.7 sMay 16Oct 313.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.9 s
May 23, 20264.3 s
May 30, 20264.4 s
Jun 6, 20264.3 s
Jun 13, 20264.3 s
Jun 20, 20264.6 s
Jun 27, 20265.5 s
Jul 4, 20265.4 s
Jul 11, 20264.6 s
Jul 18, 20264.4 s
Jul 25, 20263.6 s
Aug 1, 20263.4 s
Aug 8, 20263.5 s
Aug 15, 20263.5 s
Aug 22, 20263.5 s
Aug 29, 20263.6 s
Sep 5, 20263.6 s
Sep 12, 20263.4 s
Sep 19, 20263.5 s
Sep 26, 20263.3 s
Oct 3, 20263.2 s
Oct 10, 20263.1 s
Oct 17, 20263.2 s
Oct 24, 20263.5 s
Oct 31, 20263.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
133 ms89 msMay 16Oct 24112 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026103 ms
May 23, 2026111 ms
May 30, 202697 ms
Jun 6, 2026111 ms
Jun 20, 202697 ms
Jun 27, 2026128 ms
Jul 4, 2026125 ms
Jul 11, 2026116 ms
Jul 18, 2026112 ms
Jul 25, 2026103 ms
Aug 1, 202695 ms
Aug 8, 202694 ms
Aug 15, 202694 ms
Sep 12, 202697 ms
Sep 19, 2026100 ms
Sep 26, 2026102 ms
Oct 3, 2026107 ms
Oct 24, 2026112 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of kems.net (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. kems.net at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. kems.net at 2.2 s2.2 s
  3. kems.net at 3.3 s3.3 s
  4. kems.net at 4.4 s4.4 s
  5. kems.net at 5.5 s5.5 s
  6. kems.net at 6.6 s6.6 s
  7. kems.net at 7.7 s7.7 s
  8. kems.net at 8.8 s8.8 s

Speed

10 to fix54
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    7.7 s · 5.2 MB

    57 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5.2 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    8.4 s

    23 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 8.4 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.5 s · 447 KiB

    About 447 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    2.2 s · 472 KiB

    About 472 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 54

    54/100

    Your mobile performance score is 54. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Document request latency

    750 ms · 141 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive about 750 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Reduce initial server response time

    731 ms

    Reduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 731 ms on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 2.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 238 ms

    238 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 238 ms of main-thread work and 309 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Server response: 831 ms

    831 ms

    Your server takes 831 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Ads and cleantalk.org and others), adding 387 KiB and 282 ms of main-thread time.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 155 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    44 KiB

    2 images could be 44 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Minify CSS

    8 KiB

    8 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix50
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 9.7 s

    9.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 9.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 19.2 s

    19.2 s

    Your largest element takes 19.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Speed Index: 19.7 s

    19.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 19.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 19.6 s

    19.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 19.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors wait 3.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 103 ms to 112 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 18% faster for real visitors

    -18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.9 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 104 ms

    104 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 104 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.03

    0.03

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.03, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 5.7 MB in 76 requests

    5.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.7 MB in 76 requests on a phone: images 3.9 MB (30), scripts 1.1 MB (15) and stylesheets 499 KiB (19). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.63 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.63 g of CO₂e: 195.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9196
  • 21 text elements with low contrast

    21 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 15 links without text

    15 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 60 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8583
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Meta description is long (196 characters)

    Your meta description is 196 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 202 internal links, 23 external

    The homepage links to 202 pages on kems.net and 23 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Title: 46 characters

    Your title is a healthy 46 characters: “Best Internet Providers in Kuwait | ISP Kuwait”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://kems.net/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://kems.net/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://kems.net/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (710 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix85
  • 5 pages without a meta description

    https://kems.net/smarter-home, https://kems.net/ekit, https://kems.net/sme-voice-communication, https://kems.net/sme-voice and https://kems.net/sme-unified-communications have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://kems.net/ar/sme, whose canonical is https://kems.net/sme. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 7 pages without an H1

    https://kems.net/consumer, https://kems.net/gpon, https://kems.net/adsl-services-in-kuwait, https://kems.net/gaming-internet, https://kems.net/kidzonet and https://kems.net/sme-business-fiber and 1 other have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    https://kems.net/adsl-services-in-kuwait and https://kems.net/ar/sme took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 94 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 5 small tap targets

    5 of 8 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix64
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Only about 168 words

    The homepage has only about 168 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

4 checks passed
  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Pricing”, “Contact Center” and “Contact Us”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and LinkedIn Insight.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 5 phone links and 2 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 13 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kems.net, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Znetas

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on kems.net, including 18 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25