Website review, no card needed

kitchenaid.com.au logo

kitchenaid.com.au website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202635 issues · 86 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on kitchenaid.com.au, 14 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.5 s1.9 sMay 16Oct 312.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.2 s
May 30, 20262.1 s
Jun 6, 20262.0 s
Jun 13, 20262.0 s
Jun 20, 20262.0 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20262.0 s
Jul 11, 20261.9 s
Jul 18, 20261.9 s
Jul 25, 20262.0 s
Aug 1, 20262.0 s
Aug 8, 20262.1 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.2 s
Sep 12, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.4 s
Sep 26, 20262.4 s
Oct 3, 20262.4 s
Oct 10, 20262.4 s
Oct 17, 20262.3 s
Oct 24, 20262.2 s
Oct 31, 20262.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
335 ms168 msMay 16Oct 31279 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026195 ms
May 23, 2026189 ms
May 30, 2026187 ms
Jun 6, 2026191 ms
Jun 13, 2026212 ms
Jun 20, 2026229 ms
Jun 27, 2026241 ms
Jul 4, 2026246 ms
Jul 11, 2026241 ms
Jul 18, 2026229 ms
Jul 25, 2026226 ms
Aug 1, 2026226 ms
Aug 8, 2026223 ms
Aug 15, 2026221 ms
Aug 22, 2026220 ms
Aug 29, 2026218 ms
Sep 5, 2026225 ms
Sep 12, 2026237 ms
Sep 19, 2026255 ms
Sep 26, 2026280 ms
Oct 3, 2026295 ms
Oct 10, 2026316 ms
Oct 17, 2026314 ms
Oct 24, 2026287 ms
Oct 31, 2026279 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of kitchenaid.com.au (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. kitchenaid.com.au at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. kitchenaid.com.au at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. kitchenaid.com.au at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. kitchenaid.com.au at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. kitchenaid.com.au at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. kitchenaid.com.au at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. kitchenaid.com.au at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. kitchenaid.com.au at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

9 to fix56
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    6.5 s · 7.2 MB

    43 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (7.2 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    1.9 s · 403 KiB

    2 images could be 403 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 5.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 4,024 HTML elements

    The page has 4,024 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    820 ms · 628 KiB

    About 628 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 820 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    980 ms · 164 KiB

    About 164 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 980 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 56

    56/100

    Your mobile performance score is 56. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (VWO, Google Tag Manager and insightech.com and others), adding 854 KiB and 898 ms of main-thread time.

  • Render-blocking requests

    800 ms

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 800 ms.

  • 10 long tasks on the main thread

    10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 244 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    29 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 29 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 34 ms

    34 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 34 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 14.8 s

    14.8 s

    Your largest element takes 14.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “KitchenAid stand mixer - baking cookies at home”.

  • Time to Interactive: 20.6 s

    20.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 20.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 5.8 s

    5.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 47% slower for real visitors

    +47%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 195 ms to 279 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 534 ms

    534 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 534 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 171 ms

    171 ms

    Real visitors wait 171 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.03

    0.03

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 479 ms

    479 ms

    Real visitors wait 479 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 9.9 MB in 290 requests

    9.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 9.9 MB in 290 requests on a phone: media 5.3 MB (2), images 1.9 MB (43) and scripts 1.3 MB (84). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (63 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.82 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.82 g of CO₂e: 338.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 7189
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    5 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 5 text elements with low contrast

    5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 31 images without alt text

    31 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 33 form fields without a label

    33 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 24 links without text

    24 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Positive tabindex

    1 element has a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.

1 checks passed
  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 8595
  • 25 links with vague text

    25 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 347 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 347 pages on kitchenaid.com.au and 9 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 155 characters

    Your meta description is 155 characters: “Welcome to KitchenAid Australia! Here you will find our range of kitchen appliances, from Stand Mixers or Blenders to F…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Shopping with KitchenAid Australia”.

  • Title: 50 characters

    Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “KitchenAid | Premium Countertop Kitchen Appliances”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://kitchenaid.com.au/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Corporation and OnlineStore.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://kitchenaid.com.au/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,172 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://kitchenaid.com.au/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

3 to fix85
  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://kitchenaid.com.au/pages/returns-policy and https://kitchenaid.com.au/a/gc/gift-card have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://kitchenaid.com.au/blogs/kitchenthusiast/tagged/blog-category-hints-tips, whose canonical is https://kitchenaid.com.au/blogs/kitchenthusiast/tagged/blog-category-blog. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://kitchenaid.com.au/a/gc/gift-card has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 135 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 8 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9678
  • 4 broken images

    4 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=283019157&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=79812086-fe6f-4d96-9520-336ecdf94247&bo=1&sid=04684210d82c11f185b13d4dd282476f&vid=04687310d82c11f1b5ae63b651981b6a&vids=1&msclkid=N&gtm_.

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    28 of 33 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix69
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 623 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 623 words of visible text.

  • Urgency cues

    The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SIGN UP FOR 10% OFF” and “Sign Up for 10% Off*”.

  • 71 calls to action

    The homepage has 71 calls to action, for example “Sign Up for 10% Off”, “Register My Product” and “Check my order status”.

  • 37 short forms

    37 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Ads and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 28 cookies set on arrival

    28

    Opening the homepage sets 28 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 39 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 39 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kitchenaid.com.au, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Shopify

Company

Headquarters
Cameron Park

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on kitchenaid.com.au, including 14 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25