Website review, no card needed

kitchenhub.com logo

kitchenhub.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202632 issues · 73 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on kitchenhub.com, 12 of them high impact, across 73 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.6 s1.9 sApr 25Oct 102.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20263.4 s
May 2, 20263.4 s
May 9, 20263.3 s
May 16, 20263.2 s
May 23, 20263.2 s
May 30, 20263.2 s
Jun 6, 20263.3 s
Jun 13, 20263.3 s
Jun 20, 20263.3 s
Jun 27, 20263.1 s
Jul 4, 20263.1 s
Jul 11, 20262.8 s
Jul 18, 20262.7 s
Jul 25, 20262.7 s
Aug 1, 20262.6 s
Aug 8, 20262.6 s
Aug 15, 20262.5 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.5 s
Sep 5, 20262.5 s
Sep 12, 20262.5 s
Sep 19, 20262.5 s
Sep 26, 20262.4 s
Oct 3, 20262.2 s
Oct 10, 20262.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
238 ms192 msApr 25Oct 10203 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 2026214 ms
May 2, 2026221 ms
May 9, 2026221 ms
May 16, 2026209 ms
May 23, 2026203 ms
May 30, 2026197 ms
Jun 6, 2026200 ms
Jun 13, 2026205 ms
Jun 20, 2026220 ms
Jun 27, 2026212 ms
Jul 4, 2026211 ms
Jul 11, 2026219 ms
Jul 18, 2026220 ms
Jul 25, 2026219 ms
Aug 1, 2026221 ms
Aug 8, 2026212 ms
Aug 15, 2026213 ms
Aug 22, 2026216 ms
Aug 29, 2026218 ms
Sep 5, 2026227 ms
Sep 12, 2026233 ms
Sep 19, 2026229 ms
Sep 26, 2026219 ms
Oct 3, 2026213 ms
Oct 10, 2026203 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of kitchenhub.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. kitchenhub.com at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. kitchenhub.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  3. kitchenhub.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  4. kitchenhub.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  5. kitchenhub.com at 3.5 s3.5 s
  6. kitchenhub.com at 4.2 s4.2 s
  7. kitchenhub.com at 4.9 s4.9 s
  8. kitchenhub.com at 5.5 s5.5 s

Speed

13 to fix37
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    7.8 s · 1.5 MB

    About 1.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    4.5 s · 1.2 MB

    39 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.2 MB).

  • Mobile performance score: 37

    37/100

    Your mobile performance score is 37 (desktop: 62). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and cloudflarestorage.com and others), adding 3.1 MB and 2.0 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    450 ms · 1.1 MB

    27 images could be 1.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    800 ms

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 800 ms.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    620 ms · 129 KiB

    About 129 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 620 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 562 ms

    562 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 562 ms of main-thread work and 785 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 413 ms

    413 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 413 ms of main-thread work and 746 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • cloudflarestorage.com adds 321 ms

    321 ms

    cloudflarestorage.com costs a phone 321 ms of main-thread work and 642 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Facebook adds 269 ms

    269 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 269 ms of main-thread work and 222 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Maps adds 134 ms

    134 ms

    Google Maps costs a phone 134 ms of main-thread work and 346 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    200 ms · 77 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 77 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • 17 long tasks on the main thread

    17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 216 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 62 but mobile only 37. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    6 KiB

    6 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 7 ms

    7 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 22.6 s

    22.6 s

    Your largest element takes 22.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “A spread of dishes from the hall”.

  • Time to Interactive: 25.0 s

    25.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 25.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.0 s

    6.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.7 s

    9.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 780 ms

    780 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 780 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 50 images without width and height

    50 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 214 ms to 203 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 154 ms

    154 ms

    Real visitors wait 154 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.03

    0.03

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 743 ms

    743 ms

    Real visitors wait 743 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 36% faster for real visitors

    -36%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.039

    0.039

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.039, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix33
  • Page weight: 4.8 MB in 108 requests

    4.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.8 MB in 108 requests on a phone: scripts 2.9 MB (51), images 1.2 MB (34) and other files 382 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.36 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.36 g of CO₂e: 162.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9579
  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 11 text elements with low contrast

    11 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h2 → h4 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 58 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 7 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 10 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 7 passed and 3 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • Title is short (26 characters)

    Your title is only 26 characters: “Kitchen Hub | Landing page”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 101 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 101 pages on kitchenhub.com and 9 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 133 characters

    Your meta description is 133 characters: “A simpler take on takeout. Bringing celebrated restaurant brands across the GTA. Available for takeout and delivery on …”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “All your favourites. One order.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://kitchenhub.com/landing-page.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://kitchenhub.com/sitemap.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

1 to fix0
  • 11 linked pages are broken

    Your homepage links to /home, /restaurants, /in-the-news, /newsletter, /faq and /privacy-policy and 5 others, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 49 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9692
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 503 ()”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix72
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • Only about 38 words

    The homepage has only about 38 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

5 checks passed
  • 20 calls to action

    The homepage has 20 calls to action, for example “Order Now”, “Order here” and “Apply”.

  • 8 short forms

    8 short forms (5 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 21 testimonial or review blocks and a star rating.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and PostHog.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kitchenhub.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Sociavore
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | PostHog

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on kitchenhub.com, including 19 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25