Website review, no card needed
kitkatgroup.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202651 issues · 94 checks
This review found 51 issues worth fixing on kitkatgroup.com, 25 of them high impact, across 94 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
66DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 7.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 8.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 8.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 8.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 8.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 8.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 8.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 8.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 8.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 8.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 8.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 8.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 8.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 8.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 8.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 9.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 9.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 8.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 7.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 7.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 7.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 7.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 8.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 8.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 253 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 163 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 128 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 134 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
2.3 s
4.6 s
6.9 s
9.2 s
11.5 s
13.9 s
16.2 s
18.5 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
3.5 s · 4.4 MB5 images could be 4.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
5.3 s15 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.3 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.0 s · 1.2 MB51 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.2 MB).
Reduce unused CSS
2.9 s · 534 KiBAbout 534 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.9 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.4 s · 637 KiBAbout 637 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.4 s faster on a phone.
Document request latency
1.3 s · 53 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive about 1.3 s sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Reduce initial server response time
1.3 sReduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 1.3 s on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 36
36/100Your mobile performance score is 36 (desktop: 51). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Font display
800 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 800 ms).
Minify CSS
300 ms · 82 KiB82 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Google Tag Manager adds 245 ms
245 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 245 ms of main-thread work and 587 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Facebook adds 172 ms
172 msFacebook costs a phone 172 ms of main-thread work and 307 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Server response: 1.4 s
1.4 sYour server takes 1.4 s to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Google Maps and others), adding 1,000 KiB and 451 ms of main-thread time.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 30 KiB30 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 118 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
41 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 41 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.1 s
A phone's processor spends 1.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 497 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.2 s
5.2 sReal visitors wait 5.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.56
0.56For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.56 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 3.3 s
3.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 7.7 s
7.7 sThe first text or image appears after 7.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 15.3 s
15.3 sYour largest element takes 15.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image. Most of its time is resource load duration (8.0 s).
Speed Index: 30.7 s
30.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 30.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 15.3 s
15.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 15.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.39
0.39The layout shifts by 0.39 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 26% slower for real visitors
+26%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.6 s to 8.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
19 images without width and height
19 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 152 ms
152 msReal visitors wait 152 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 800 ms
800 msReal visitors wait 800 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 37% faster for real visitors
-37%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 253 ms to 134 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 68 ms
68 msScripts block the page for only 68 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.5 MB in 74 requests
6.5 MBYour homepage downloads 6.5 MB in 74 requests on a phone: images 4.5 MB (19), scripts 1.3 MB (29) and stylesheets 578 KiB (15). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
image-1.jpg weighs 3.8 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
5 images in older formats
5 images (4.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image far larger than shown
47 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Whatsapp.png at 1,148 px wide, shown at 120 px. Resized copies would save about 47 KiB.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (52 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit
1.85 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.85 g of CO₂e: 222.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Images must have alternative text (1 element)
Images must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
5 links without text
5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 8 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
12 internal links, 9 external
The homepage links to 12 pages on kitkatgroup.com and 9 external pages.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 134 characters
Your meta description is 134 characters: “The brand Kit Kat is recognized as one of the leading brands in the FMCG industry today, and it symbolizes the trust of…”.
Title: 48 characters
Your title is a healthy 48 characters: “Kitkat Group - Welcome to Kitkat Cash and Carry.”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.kitkatgroup.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
Some text only appears after JavaScript runs
57%The HTML your server sends has 443 of the 773 words a browser shows. AI crawlers don't run JavaScript, so they miss the rest.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
4 pages share a meta description
/initiative.php, /contacts.php, /privacy.php and /return%20policy.php use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
5 pages without an H1
/initiative.php, /Shop/index.php, /stores.php, /contacts.php and /privacy.php have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
/contacts.php has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
5 pages slow to respond
/about.php, /initiative.php, /promotions.php, /Shop/index.php and /return%20policy.php took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
8 internal pages checked
We fetched 8 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 8 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 8 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 8 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 broken images
4 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://kitkatgroup.com/images/testimonial2/ahmed...jpg.
1 small tap target
1 of 5 tappable elements near the top of the page is smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 8 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 773 words of copy
The homepage carries about 773 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SHOP ONLINE ↗”.
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “SHOP ONLINE” and “Contact US”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
8 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kitkatgroup.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Neotel
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 51 issues on kitkatgroup.com, including 24 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.