Website review, no card needed
lakotamade.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202645 issues · 70 checks
This review found 45 issues worth fixing on lakotamade.com, 20 of them high impact, across 70 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
49FClosest competitors among Weebly websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 5.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2026 | 278 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 264 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 270 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 270 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 262 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 270 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 270 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 271 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 288 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 293 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 287 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 288 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 299 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.7 s
1.4 s
2.1 s
2.8 s
3.5 s
4.2 s
4.9 s
5.6 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
8.4 s · 2.4 MBAbout 2.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.4 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
5.3 s · 946 KiB18 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (946 KiB).
Weebly adds 1.3 s
1.3 sWeebly costs a phone 1.3 s of main-thread work and 5.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
canva.com adds 1.4 s
1.4 scanva.com costs a phone 1.4 s of main-thread work and 3.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
1.2 s4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.
Main-thread work: 11.0 s
A phone's processor spends 11.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 6.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 9
9/100Your mobile performance score is 9. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (canva.com, Weebly and Google CDN and others), adding 11.6 MB and 3.9 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
3.5 MB2 images could be 3.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 957 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
290 ms · 418 KiBAbout 418 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 290 ms faster on a phone.
Google CDN adds 341 ms
341 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 341 ms of main-thread work and 743 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
squarecdn.com adds 235 ms
235 mssquarecdn.com costs a phone 235 ms of main-thread work and 532 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Cookiebot adds 238 ms
238 msCookiebot costs a phone 238 ms of main-thread work and 312 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 41 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 41 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 96 ms
96 msYour server sent the HTML in 96 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.0 s
5.0 sReal visitors wait 5.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.96
0.96For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.96 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 1.972
1.972The layout shifts by 1.972 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 35.0 s
35.0 sYour largest element takes 35.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Pȟežúta. Our first medicines. They were here long before an…”.
Speed Index: 19.9 s
19.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 19.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 53.5 s
53.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 53.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 3.8 s
3.8 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 3.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 342 ms
342 msReal visitors wait 342 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
17 images without width and height
17 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s
1.8 sThe first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 278 ms to 299 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.9 s to 5.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 12.5 MB in 297 requests
12.5 MBYour homepage downloads 12.5 MB in 297 requests on a phone: scripts 5.6 MB (104), images 4.9 MB (70) and fonts 1.1 MB (15). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 3.6 g of CO₂ per visit
3.55 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.55 g of CO₂e: 426.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
26 text elements with low contrast
26 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Frames without titles
2 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 checks passed
11 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 12 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 11 passed and 1 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is long (79 characters)
Your title is 79 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Lakota Made | Native-Owned Herbal Apothecary & Plant Medicine | Lakota Made LLC”.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 130 characters
Your meta description is 130 characters: “Homepage Small batch salves, tinctures, teas, and infused honeys made with traditional Lakota plant knowledge. Native w…”.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.lakotamade.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.lakotamade.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Best practices
6 third-party cookies
6 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'register')”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 0 words
The homepage has only about 0 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
1 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
11 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lakotamade.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- Square Online
- E-commerce
- Shopify;Shopify Plus
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Weebly, Inc.
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 45 issues on lakotamade.com, including 27 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.