Website review, no card needed

lapislazuliworld.com logo

lapislazuliworld.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202635 issues · 103 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on lapislazuliworld.com, 12 of them high impact, across 103 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.2 s3.1 sMay 16Oct 313.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20264.3 s
May 23, 20264.4 s
May 30, 20264.6 s
Jun 6, 20264.5 s
Jun 13, 20264.4 s
Jun 20, 20264.6 s
Jun 27, 20264.7 s
Jul 4, 20264.6 s
Jul 11, 20264.7 s
Jul 18, 20264.4 s
Jul 25, 20264.6 s
Aug 1, 20264.7 s
Aug 8, 20265.0 s
Aug 15, 20265.0 s
Aug 22, 20264.8 s
Aug 29, 20264.8 s
Sep 5, 20264.6 s
Sep 12, 20264.5 s
Sep 19, 20264.5 s
Sep 26, 20264.5 s
Oct 3, 20264.5 s
Oct 10, 20264.5 s
Oct 17, 20264.1 s
Oct 24, 20263.7 s
Oct 31, 20263.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
125 ms90 msMay 16Oct 31104 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026115 ms
May 23, 2026105 ms
May 30, 2026101 ms
Jun 6, 2026116 ms
Jun 13, 2026104 ms
Jun 20, 202696 ms
Jun 27, 2026102 ms
Jul 4, 202694 ms
Jul 11, 202696 ms
Jul 18, 2026112 ms
Jul 25, 2026115 ms
Aug 1, 2026121 ms
Aug 8, 2026116 ms
Aug 15, 2026113 ms
Aug 22, 2026111 ms
Aug 29, 2026113 ms
Sep 5, 2026111 ms
Sep 12, 2026107 ms
Sep 19, 2026104 ms
Sep 26, 202695 ms
Oct 3, 202695 ms
Oct 10, 2026102 ms
Oct 17, 2026105 ms
Oct 24, 2026104 ms
Oct 31, 2026104 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of lapislazuliworld.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. lapislazuliworld.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. lapislazuliworld.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. lapislazuliworld.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  4. lapislazuliworld.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  5. lapislazuliworld.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  6. lapislazuliworld.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  7. lapislazuliworld.com at 3.5 s3.5 s
  8. lapislazuliworld.com at 4.0 s4.0 s

lapislazuliworld.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

7 to fix66
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.3 s

    52 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.0 s · 182 KiB

    5 images could be 182 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.0 s faster on a phone.

  • 3,112 HTML elements

    The page has 3,112 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    900 ms · 157 KiB

    About 157 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 66

    66/100

    Your mobile performance score is 66. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Font display

    700 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 700 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    350 ms · 35 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 35 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (cdn-cookieyes.com, Pinterest and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 409 KiB and 198 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 13 KiB

    5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (13 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    140 ms · 11 KiB

    About 11 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 140 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 693 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 60 ms

    60 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 60 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 12.9 s

    12.9 s

    Your largest element takes 12.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 13.0 s

    13.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 13.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.2 s

    6.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    Real visitors wait 3.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 115 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 97 ms

    97 ms

    Real visitors wait 97 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 19% faster for real visitors

    -19%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.3 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.009

    0.009

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.009, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix40
  • Page weight: 4.3 MB in 165 requests

    4.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.3 MB in 165 requests on a phone: images 1.5 MB (35), other files 1.5 MB (17) and scripts 777 KiB (57). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 9 images far larger than shown

    630 KiB

    9 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example slider180.jpg at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 630 KiB.

  • 10 images in older formats

    10 images (1.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (25 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.21 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.21 g of CO₂e: 145.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8990
  • 32 text elements with low contrast

    32 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 20 tap targets too small

    20 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (197 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 197 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (11 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 67 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 7 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 9298
  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 457 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 457 pages on lapislazuliworld.com and 9 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 152 characters

    Your meta description is 152 characters: “Handcrafted lapis lazuli jewelry made in Santiago, Chile since 1972. Rings, necklaces and earrings in silver and gold, …”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Handcrafted Lapis Lazuli Jewelry from Chile, Since 1972”.

  • Title: 62 characters

    Your title is a healthy 62 characters: “Lapis Lazuli Jewelry Handcrafted in Chile | Lapis Lazuli World”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.lapislazuliworld.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.lapislazuliworld.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,765 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (5 KiB, 24 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    /our-instagram is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 9 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 9 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /product-category/brooches, whose canonical is /brooches. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page without an H1

    /our-instagram has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 152 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10087
  • 29 small tap targets

    29 of 61 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “%c%d font-size:0;color:transparent NaN”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://lapislazuliworld.com/wishlist.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (lapislazuliworld.com).

  • Valid certificate (57 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for lapislazuliworld.com and is valid for another 57 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://lapislazuliworld.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 45 links work

    All 45 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 5 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    lapislazuliworld.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    lapislazuliworld.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 25 years old

    25 years

    lapislazuliworld.com was registered in Apr 2001 through NameCheap, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Apr 2027

    lapislazuliworld.com is registered until Apr 2027.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: “more than 24,000 happy clients”. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,847 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,847 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “CONTACT US” and “Shop the Collection”.

  • 37 calls to action

    The homepage has 37 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Shop All Bracelets” and “Shop All Charms & Pendants”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Email authentication

1 to fix70
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be lapislazuliworld.com is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.

  • Email authentication score: 70/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 ip4:106.0.63.22 +a +mx +ip4:68.66.226.85 +ip4:185.148.46.252 include:spf.a2hosting.com ~all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “s1”, “s2” and “default”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and Pinterest Tag (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 10 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: CookieYes

    A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
WooCommerce
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on lapislazuliworld.com, including 15 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25