Website review, no card needed

lapperre.be logo

lapperre.be website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202631 issues · 82 checks

This review found 31 issues worth fixing on lapperre.be, 11 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.5 s2.1 sMay 16Oct 312.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.4 s
May 23, 20263.4 s
May 30, 20263.3 s
Jun 6, 20263.2 s
Jun 13, 20263.2 s
Jun 20, 20263.0 s
Jun 27, 20262.8 s
Jul 4, 20262.8 s
Jul 11, 20262.8 s
Jul 18, 20262.8 s
Jul 25, 20262.7 s
Aug 1, 20262.7 s
Aug 8, 20262.7 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.7 s
Sep 12, 20262.7 s
Sep 19, 20262.6 s
Sep 26, 20262.5 s
Oct 3, 20262.4 s
Oct 10, 20262.3 s
Oct 17, 20262.3 s
Oct 24, 20262.4 s
Oct 31, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
253 ms190 msMay 16Oct 31213 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026211 ms
May 23, 2026212 ms
May 30, 2026216 ms
Jun 6, 2026228 ms
Jun 13, 2026237 ms
Jun 20, 2026243 ms
Jun 27, 2026246 ms
Jul 4, 2026238 ms
Jul 11, 2026236 ms
Jul 18, 2026235 ms
Jul 25, 2026230 ms
Aug 1, 2026230 ms
Aug 8, 2026234 ms
Aug 15, 2026223 ms
Aug 22, 2026212 ms
Aug 29, 2026208 ms
Sep 5, 2026197 ms
Sep 12, 2026199 ms
Sep 19, 2026203 ms
Sep 26, 2026205 ms
Oct 3, 2026201 ms
Oct 10, 2026200 ms
Oct 17, 2026204 ms
Oct 24, 2026203 ms
Oct 31, 2026213 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of lapperre.be (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. lapperre.be at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. lapperre.be at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. lapperre.be at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. lapperre.be at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. lapperre.be at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. lapperre.be at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. lapperre.be at 2.7 s2.7 s
  8. lapperre.be at 3.1 s3.1 s

Speed

9 to fix51
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    5.0 s · 1,012 KiB

    44 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1,012 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.2 s · 534 KiB

    About 534 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    450 ms · 615 KiB

    10 images could be 615 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 51

    51/100

    Your mobile performance score is 51. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Optanon and Clarity and others), adding 1.5 MB and 584 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 314 ms

    314 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 314 ms of main-thread work and 367 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • contentstack.com adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    contentstack.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 759 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 204 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 21 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    24 KiB

    About 24 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 17 ms

    17 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 17 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 15.1 s

    15.1 s

    Your largest element takes 15.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “M_Headerbeeld_HP_485x800_FRx2.webp”.

  • Time to Interactive: 15.4 s

    15.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.1 s

    9.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 920 ms

    920 ms

    Real visitors wait 920 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 525 ms

    525 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 525 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 211 ms to 213 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 170 ms

    170 ms

    Real visitors wait 170 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.03

    0.03

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 28% faster for real visitors

    -28%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.037

    0.037

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.037, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix69
  • Page weight: 2.5 MB in 105 requests

    2.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.5 MB in 105 requests on a phone: scripts 1.4 MB (41), images 770 KiB (14) and other files 154 KiB (40). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    Phonak_EON_Main_Menu.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    60 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example IMG-600x600.webp at 1,200 px wide, shown at 260 px. Resized copies would save about 60 KiB.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (290 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.70 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.70 g of CO₂e: 84.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8493
  • 13 buttons without a name

    13 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (96 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 96 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 16 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 6 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10096
  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (untyped) but with 1 problem, for example “ld+json block 1 is not valid JSON (Unexpected non-whitespace character after JSON at position 4)”.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 82 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 82 pages on lapperre.be and 8 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 126 characters

    Your meta description is 126 characters: “Lapperre est la référence au niveau des appareils et accessoires auditifs en Belgique. Ici vous trouverez tout sur l'au…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Faites tester votre audition pendant nos Journées de tests auditifs gratuits​”.

  • Title: 54 characters

    Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “Lapperre, du bonheur plein les oreilles, depuis 77 ans”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.lapperre.be/fr/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.lapperre.be/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (741 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 6 pages without a meta description

    https://www.lapperre.be/fr/centre-auditif/trouver, https://www.lapperre.be/fr/test-auditif-en-ligne, https://www.lapperre.be/fr/assistance, https://www.lapperre.be/fr/onlinebookingBEFR, https://www.lapperre.be/fr/appareils-auditifs/assurances and https://www.lapperre.be/fr/appareils-auditifs/plan-supportaudition have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.lapperre.be/fr/centre-auditif/trouver has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://www.lapperre.be/fr/onlinebookingBEFR has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 53 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10084
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.net/action/0?ti=5599680&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=776e86d8-8c66-4d9d-bb90-153325bc6ad0&bo=2&page_path=%2Ffr%2F&tpp=1&spa=Y&r=&lt=645&p=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lapperre.be%2Ffr%2F&pi=918639831&lg=.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    78 of 78 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix80
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 884 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 884 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact”.

  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact” and “Formulaire de contact”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Ads and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 19 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lapperre.be, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Azure

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 31 issues on lapperre.be, including 16 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25