Website review, no card needed

lathem.com logo

lathem.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202635 issues · 90 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on lathem.com, 9 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.6 s1.9 sMay 2Oct 172.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.2 s
May 9, 20262.1 s
May 16, 20262.4 s
May 23, 20262.4 s
May 30, 20262.4 s
Jun 6, 20262.5 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.3 s
Jun 27, 20262.3 s
Jul 4, 20262.1 s
Jul 11, 20262.1 s
Jul 18, 20262.2 s
Jul 25, 20262.3 s
Aug 1, 20262.3 s
Aug 8, 20262.3 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.3 s
Sep 5, 20262.2 s
Sep 12, 20262.2 s
Sep 19, 20262.0 s
Sep 26, 20262.0 s
Oct 3, 20262.0 s
Oct 10, 20262.1 s
Oct 17, 20262.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
136 ms82 msMay 2Oct 17112 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202696 ms
May 9, 2026104 ms
May 16, 2026113 ms
May 23, 2026130 ms
May 30, 2026126 ms
Jun 6, 2026120 ms
Jun 13, 2026103 ms
Jun 20, 202691 ms
Jun 27, 202691 ms
Jul 4, 202689 ms
Jul 11, 202688 ms
Jul 18, 202694 ms
Jul 25, 202696 ms
Aug 1, 202695 ms
Aug 8, 202696 ms
Aug 15, 2026101 ms
Aug 22, 202697 ms
Aug 29, 2026101 ms
Sep 5, 2026100 ms
Sep 12, 202696 ms
Sep 19, 2026103 ms
Sep 26, 2026104 ms
Oct 3, 2026104 ms
Oct 10, 2026113 ms
Oct 17, 2026112 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of lathem.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. lathem.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  2. lathem.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  3. lathem.com at 3.5 s3.5 s
  4. lathem.com at 4.7 s4.7 s
  5. lathem.com at 5.9 s5.9 s
  6. lathem.com at 7.1 s7.1 s
  7. lathem.com at 8.3 s8.3 s
  8. lathem.com at 9.5 s9.5 s

Speed

11 to fix58
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.1 s

    18 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.1 s.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Hotjar and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.0 s of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 58

    58/100

    Your mobile performance score is 58 (desktop: 87). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    790 ms · 188 KiB

    About 188 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 790 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    661 KiB

    About 661 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 414 KiB

    20 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (414 KiB).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 387 ms

    387 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 387 ms of main-thread work and 374 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    300 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 300 ms).

  • Main-thread work: 2.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 15 long tasks on the main thread

    15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 268 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Vimeo adds 33 ms

    33 ms

    Vimeo costs a phone 33 ms of main-thread work and 513 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 98 KiB

    11 images could be 98 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify CSS

    160 ms · 7 KiB

    7 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    23 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 23 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 87 but mobile only 58. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Minify JavaScript

    10 KiB

    10 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Speed Index: 14.3 s

    14.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 17.2 s

    17.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 17.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 693 ms

    693 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 693 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.7 s

    3.7 s

    Your largest element takes 3.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “PayClock makes employee time tracking and attendance manage…”. Most of its time is element render delay (7.9 s).

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 15 images without width and height

    15 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 13% slower for real visitors

    +13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 96 ms to 112 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 113 ms

    113 ms

    Real visitors wait 113 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 654 ms

    654 ms

    Real visitors wait 654 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.2 MB in 102 requests

    2.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.2 MB in 102 requests on a phone: scripts 1.6 MB (37), images 275 KiB (20) and stylesheets 140 KiB (17). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 6 images below the first screen load straight away

    6 images further down the page (172 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.62 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.62 g of CO₂e: 74.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 7890
  • 26 text elements with low contrast

    26 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Links look like plain text

    5 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 8280
  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Structured data has 2 problems

    Structured data found (Organization and Service) but with 2 problems, for example “Service: missing name”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.lathem.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at lathem.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 49 internal links, 12 external

    The homepage links to 49 pages on lathem.com and 12 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Meta description: 159 characters

    Your meta description is 159 characters: “Lathem provides the best in time clock solutions for small businesses. From electronic time clocks, to attendance softw…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Employee Time Tracking System & Time Clock Software”.

  • Title: 53 characters

    Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “Employee Time Tracking & Time Clock Software | Lathem”.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.lathem.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (492 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://www.lathem.com/time-clocks/punch-time-clocks took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 37 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    12 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 12 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

5 to fixGoogle 5069
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=17431161&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=4eb46bf4-9a70-4a79-8d1c-dfc26cd28a51&bo=1&sid=f2fd5a70cda411f1903ae95495526aac&vid=f2fd7f30cda411f199f2cfbf82c8399a&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=91.

  • 2 small tap targets

    2 of 8 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 third-party cookies

    2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “%c%d font-size:0;color:transparent NaN”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 8 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 402 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 402 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get a quote” and “View demo”.

  • 9 calls to action

    The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Get a quote” and “View demo”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (0 fields at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and HubSpot and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 23 cookies set on arrival

    23

    Opening the homepage sets 23 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 30 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 30 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner

    A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lathem.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on lathem.com, including 17 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25