Website review, no card needed
laticrete.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202636 issues · 83 checks
This review found 36 issues worth fixing on laticrete.com, 20 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
71CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 149 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 146 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 149 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 156 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.4 s
2.9 s
4.3 s
5.8 s
7.2 s
8.6 s
10.1 s
11.5 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.1 s · 1.7 MBAbout 1.7 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.8 s6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.
Azure Web Services adds 1.4 s
1.4 sAzure Web Services costs a phone 1.4 s of main-thread work and 2.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 30
30/100Your mobile performance score is 30. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
600 ms · 2.2 MB17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.2 MB).
5 third-party services on the page
5 third-party services load with your homepage (Azure Web Services, cdn-cookieyes.com and JSDelivr CDN and others), adding 2.5 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
750 ms · 159 KiBAbout 159 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Document request latency
800 msThe HTML itself could arrive about 800 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Reduce initial server response time
784 msReduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 784 ms on a phone.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 692 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
600 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 600 ms).
Main-thread work: 2.9 s
A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
1,788 HTML elements
The page has 1,788 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Server response: 884 ms
884 msYour server takes 884 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 11 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.4 s
5.4 sReal visitors wait 5.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 4.8 s
4.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors wait 3.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 10.9 s
10.9 sYour largest element takes 10.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve p…”. Most of its time is element render delay (9.1 s).
Speed Index: 16.2 s
16.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 16.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 25.3 s
25.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 25.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.7 s
5.7 sThe first text or image appears after 5.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.5 s
1.5 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.5 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 149 ms to 156 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.6 s to 4.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 115 ms
115 msReal visitors wait 115 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.05
0.05For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.05 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.038
0.038The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.038, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.3 MB in 59 requests
4.3 MBYour homepage downloads 4.3 MB in 59 requests on a phone: scripts 2.9 MB (27), HTML 639 KiB (2) and fonts 566 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit
1.21 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.21 g of CO₂e: 144.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Unlabelled dropdowns
2 dropdowns have no label.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
11 text elements with low contrast
11 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Documents must have <title> element to aid in navigation (1 element)
Documents must have <title> element to aid in navigation: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
6 form fields without a label
6 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 2 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
50 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 4 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (11 characters)
Your title is only 11 characters: “New Zealand”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
11 links crawlers can't follow
11 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
361 internal links, 16 external
The homepage links to 361 pages on laticrete.com and 16 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Select a Region”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.laticrete.com/map.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.laticrete.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.laticrete.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.
Other pages
3 pages slow to respond
https://www.laticrete.com/our-products/tile-and-stone-installation/uncoupling-and-anti-fracture-membranes, https://www.laticrete.com/our-products/tile-and-stone-installation/tile-and-stone-adhesives and https://www.laticrete.com/our-products/adhered-facade-and-wall-finish-systems/masonry-veneer-installation-system-mvis took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 147 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
13 small tap targets
13 of 20 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Only about 111 words
The homepage has only about 111 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “WHERE TO BUY”.
23 calls to action
The homepage has 23 calls to action, for example “Order Samples”, “Order Marketing Literature” and “Contact Us”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
4 cookies set on arrival
4Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
5 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
2 checks passed
Consent tool: CookieYes
A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at laticrete.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Azure
Company
- Founded
- 1956
- Headquarters
- Bethany
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 36 issues on laticrete.com, including 23 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.