Website review, no card needed

lecot.be logo

lecot.be website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202637 issues · 97 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on lecot.be, 11 of them high impact, across 97 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.5 s3.0 sMay 16Oct 313.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.4 s
May 23, 20263.3 s
May 30, 20263.3 s
Jun 6, 20263.2 s
Jun 13, 20263.2 s
Jun 20, 20263.1 s
Jun 27, 20263.1 s
Jul 4, 20263.1 s
Jul 11, 20263.1 s
Jul 18, 20263.1 s
Jul 25, 20263.1 s
Aug 1, 20263.1 s
Aug 8, 20263.1 s
Aug 15, 20263.1 s
Aug 22, 20263.2 s
Aug 29, 20263.2 s
Sep 5, 20263.2 s
Sep 12, 20263.2 s
Sep 19, 20263.3 s
Sep 26, 20263.3 s
Oct 3, 20263.4 s
Oct 10, 20263.3 s
Oct 17, 20263.3 s
Oct 24, 20263.3 s
Oct 31, 20263.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
197 ms153 msMay 16Oct 31188 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026160 ms
May 23, 2026158 ms
May 30, 2026160 ms
Jun 6, 2026161 ms
Jun 13, 2026162 ms
Jun 20, 2026163 ms
Jun 27, 2026164 ms
Jul 4, 2026165 ms
Jul 11, 2026168 ms
Jul 18, 2026169 ms
Jul 25, 2026169 ms
Aug 1, 2026172 ms
Aug 8, 2026178 ms
Aug 15, 2026180 ms
Aug 22, 2026184 ms
Aug 29, 2026188 ms
Sep 5, 2026188 ms
Sep 12, 2026187 ms
Sep 19, 2026189 ms
Sep 26, 2026186 ms
Oct 3, 2026187 ms
Oct 10, 2026190 ms
Oct 17, 2026190 ms
Oct 24, 2026192 ms
Oct 31, 2026188 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

10 to fix69
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    500 ms · 537 KiB

    13 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (537 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 69

    69/100

    Your mobile performance score is 69. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Improve image delivery

    866 KiB

    17 images could be 866 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 150 KiB

    About 150 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    714 KiB

    About 714 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Cookiebot and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 1.1 MB and 516 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google CDN adds 234 ms

    234 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 234 ms of main-thread work and 734 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,946 HTML elements

    The page has 2,946 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Main-thread work: 2.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 198 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    24 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 24 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 9 ms

    9 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 9 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 21.4 s

    21.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 21.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.1 s

    5.1 s

    Your largest element takes 5.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 7.0 s

    7.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 204 ms

    204 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 204 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 19% slower for real visitors

    +19%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 160 ms to 188 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 156 ms

    156 ms

    Real visitors wait 156 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 608 ms

    608 ms

    Real visitors wait 608 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.021

    0.021

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.021, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 4.5 MB in 147 requests

    4.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.5 MB in 147 requests on a phone: images 1.8 MB (42), scripts 1.8 MB (93) and fonts 379 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (93 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.28 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.28 g of CO₂e: 153.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8391
  • 6 buttons without a name

    6 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 2 tap targets too small

    2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (14 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 14 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements use prohibited ARIA attributes

    Elements use prohibited ARIA attributes (3 elements).

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" do not have accessible names.

    Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" do not have accessible names. (1 element).

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 90 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9281
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Alles voor de professional” and “Alles voor elke professional”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (BreadcrumbList and Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: missing name”.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • 128 internal links, 13 external

    The homepage links to 128 pages on lecot.be and 13 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Title: 45 characters

    Your title is a healthy 45 characters: “Gereedschappen voor elke professional | Lecot”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://lecot.be/shop/nl-be/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://lecot.be/shop/nl-be/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (0 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (657 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix68
  • 1 page without a title

    /shop/nl-be/widgets/menu/offcanvas has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    /shop/nl-be/widgets/menu/offcanvas is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 8 pages without a meta description

    /shop/nl-be/services, /shop/nl-be/sectoren-en-specialisaties, /shop/nl-be/folders-flyers, /shop/nl-be/c/contacteer-ons, /shop/nl-be/widgets/menu/offcanvas and /shop/nl-be/c/lecot/services/bestellen-bij-lecot and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    /shop/nl-be/widgets/menu/offcanvas has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 82 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

Best practices

Google 96100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    38 of 40 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • 2 redirects before the homepage

    Opening https://lecot.be goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (lecot.be).

  • Valid certificate (29 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for lecot.be and is valid for another 29 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://lecot.be redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 47 links work

    All 47 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 7 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    lecot.be has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 7 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 427 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 427 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 11 short forms

    11 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Email authentication

100
  • Email authentication score: 100/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:81.246.103.8 ip4:81.246.77.205 ip4:141.135.51.127 ip4:152.228.154.161 ip4:94.237.110.170 ip6:2a04:3544:1000:…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 3 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on lecot.be, including 16 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25