Website review, no card needed
leekduck.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202639 issues · 84 checks
This review found 39 issues worth fixing on leekduck.com, 16 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 912 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 922 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 935 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 950 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 959 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 947 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 945 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 943 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 950 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 967 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 973 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 964 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 863 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 842 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 835 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 831 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 864 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 884 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 890 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 889 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 886 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 878 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 875 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 876 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 881 ms |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 114 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 116 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 118 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 117 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 116 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 131 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.9 s · 1.2 MBAbout 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 19.4 s
A phone's processor spends 19.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 10.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Rubicon Project adds 1.1 s
1.1 sRubicon Project costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 124 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
nitropay.com adds 1.0 s
1.0 snitropay.com costs a phone 1.0 s of main-thread work and 311 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 36
36/100Your mobile performance score is 36 (desktop: 54). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Rubicon Project, nitropay.com and scalibur.io and others), adding 2.4 MB and 5.9 s of main-thread time.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.3 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 945 KiB137 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (945 KiB).
scalibur.io adds 915 ms
915 msscalibur.io costs a phone 915 ms of main-thread work and 293 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
confiant-integrations.net adds 643 ms
643 msconfiant-integrations.net costs a phone 643 ms of main-thread work and 378 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Pubmatic adds 637 ms
637 msPubmatic costs a phone 637 ms of main-thread work and 99 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
155 KiB1 image could be 155 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.
Legacy JavaScript
58 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 58 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 1 ms
1 msYour server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 10.1 s
10.1 sYour largest element takes 10.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “More mega moments! Additional Charged Attacks and Mega Mewt…”.
Total Blocking Time: 5.6 s
5.6 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 5.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 49.8 s
49.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 49.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.5 s
7.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 1.9 s
1.9 sThe first text or image appears after 1.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 17% slower for real visitors
+17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 113 ms to 131 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.9 s to 0.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 0.9 s
0.9 sReal visitors wait 0.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 112 ms
112 msReal visitors wait 112 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.7 s
0.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 307 ms
307 msReal visitors wait 307 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.7 MB in 1,079 requests
5.7 MBYour homepage downloads 5.7 MB in 1,079 requests on a phone: scripts 3.1 MB (81), images 1.5 MB (309) and other files 577 KiB (560). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit
1.61 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.61 g of CO₂e: 192.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
10 text elements with low contrast
10 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
9 tap targets too small
9 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (19 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 19 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
Users should be able to zoom and scale the text up to 500% (1 element)
Users should be able to zoom and scale the text up to 500%: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
31 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 40 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 31 passed and 9 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
62 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 62 pages on leekduck.com and 7 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 146 characters
Your meta description is 146 characters: “Get the latest info on Shiny Pokémon, Raid Bosses, Research, and more in Pokémon GO from Leek Duck, a Trainer from NYC.…”.
Title: 41 characters
Your title is a healthy 41 characters: “Leek Duck | Pokémon GO News and Resources”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://leekduck.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://leekduck.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://leekduck.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (216 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://leekduck.com/penpal, whose canonical is https://leekduck.com/about. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page without an H1
https://leekduck.com/shiny has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
https://leekduck.com/shiny has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 24 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
37 third-party cookies
37 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
14 small tap targets
14 of 61 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“The Topics API is deprecated and will be removed in a future release.”).
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'getRegistration')”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Only about 204 words
The homepage has only about 204 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Raid NOW Join & Host Global Raids”.
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
8 trackers load before any consent
8Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Comscore, Criteo, Google Ads and Google Analytics and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
19 cookies set on arrival
19Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
53 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 53 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at leekduck.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 39 issues on leekduck.com, including 16 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.