Website review, no card needed

leekduck.com logo

leekduck.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202639 issues · 84 checks

This review found 39 issues worth fixing on leekduck.com, 16 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
994 ms810 msApr 18Oct 3881 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 2026912 ms
Apr 25, 2026922 ms
May 2, 2026935 ms
May 9, 2026950 ms
May 16, 2026959 ms
May 23, 2026947 ms
May 30, 2026945 ms
Jun 6, 2026943 ms
Jun 13, 2026950 ms
Jun 20, 2026967 ms
Jun 27, 2026973 ms
Jul 4, 2026964 ms
Jul 11, 2026863 ms
Jul 18, 2026842 ms
Jul 25, 2026835 ms
Aug 1, 2026831 ms
Aug 8, 2026864 ms
Aug 15, 2026884 ms
Aug 22, 2026890 ms
Aug 29, 2026889 ms
Sep 5, 2026886 ms
Sep 12, 2026878 ms
Sep 19, 2026875 ms
Sep 26, 2026876 ms
Oct 3, 2026881 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
138 ms110 msApr 18Oct 3131 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026113 ms
Apr 25, 2026114 ms
May 2, 2026116 ms
May 9, 2026118 ms
May 16, 2026117 ms
May 23, 2026116 ms
May 30, 2026114 ms
Jun 6, 2026114 ms
Jun 13, 2026116 ms
Jun 20, 2026120 ms
Jun 27, 2026123 ms
Jul 4, 2026123 ms
Jul 11, 2026121 ms
Jul 18, 2026121 ms
Jul 25, 2026120 ms
Aug 1, 2026121 ms
Aug 8, 2026121 ms
Aug 15, 2026123 ms
Aug 22, 2026125 ms
Aug 29, 2026128 ms
Sep 5, 2026133 ms
Sep 12, 2026134 ms
Sep 19, 2026135 ms
Sep 26, 2026135 ms
Oct 3, 2026131 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of leekduck.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. leekduck.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. leekduck.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. leekduck.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. leekduck.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. leekduck.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. leekduck.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. leekduck.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. leekduck.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

11 to fix36
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.9 s · 1.2 MB

    About 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 19.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 19.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 10.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Rubicon Project adds 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Rubicon Project costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 124 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • nitropay.com adds 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    nitropay.com costs a phone 1.0 s of main-thread work and 311 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 36

    36/100

    Your mobile performance score is 36 (desktop: 54). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Rubicon Project, nitropay.com and scalibur.io and others), adding 2.4 MB and 5.9 s of main-thread time.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.3 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 945 KiB

    137 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (945 KiB).

  • scalibur.io adds 915 ms

    915 ms

    scalibur.io costs a phone 915 ms of main-thread work and 293 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • confiant-integrations.net adds 643 ms

    643 ms

    confiant-integrations.net costs a phone 643 ms of main-thread work and 378 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Pubmatic adds 637 ms

    637 ms

    Pubmatic costs a phone 637 ms of main-thread work and 99 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    155 KiB

    1 image could be 155 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Render-blocking requests

    150 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    58 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 58 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.1 s

    10.1 s

    Your largest element takes 10.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “More mega moments! Additional Charged Attacks and Mega Mewt…”.

  • Total Blocking Time: 5.6 s

    5.6 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 5.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 49.8 s

    49.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 49.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.5 s

    7.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 17% slower for real visitors

    +17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 113 ms to 131 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.9 s to 0.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors wait 0.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 112 ms

    112 ms

    Real visitors wait 112 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.7 s

    0.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 307 ms

    307 ms

    Real visitors wait 307 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix33
  • Page weight: 5.7 MB in 1,079 requests

    5.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.7 MB in 1,079 requests on a phone: scripts 3.1 MB (81), images 1.5 MB (309) and other files 577 KiB (560). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.61 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.61 g of CO₂e: 192.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 7683
  • 10 text elements with low contrast

    10 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 9 tap targets too small

    9 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (19 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 19 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • Users should be able to zoom and scale the text up to 500% (1 element)

    Users should be able to zoom and scale the text up to 500%: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 31 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 40 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 31 passed and 9 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9286
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 62 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 62 pages on leekduck.com and 7 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 146 characters

    Your meta description is 146 characters: “Get the latest info on Shiny Pokémon, Raid Bosses, Research, and more in Pokémon GO from Leek Duck, a Trainer from NYC.…”.

  • Title: 41 characters

    Your title is a healthy 41 characters: “Leek Duck | Pokémon GO News and Resources”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://leekduck.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://leekduck.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://leekduck.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (216 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://leekduck.com/penpal, whose canonical is https://leekduck.com/about. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://leekduck.com/shiny has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://leekduck.com/shiny has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 24 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 3583
  • 37 third-party cookies

    37 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 14 small tap targets

    14 of 61 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“The Topics API is deprecated and will be removed in a future release.”).

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'getRegistration')”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Only about 204 words

    The homepage has only about 204 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Raid NOW Join & Host Global Raids”.

  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Comscore, Criteo, Google Ads and Google Analytics and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 19 cookies set on arrival

    19

    Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 53 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 53 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at leekduck.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 39 issues on leekduck.com, including 16 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25