Website review, no card needed

lendi.com.au logo

lendi.com.au website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202646 issues · 77 checks

This review found 46 issues worth fixing on lendi.com.au, 21 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.4 s3.1 sMay 16Oct 313.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.1 s
May 23, 20263.2 s
May 30, 20263.2 s
Jun 6, 20263.2 s
Jun 13, 20263.2 s
Jun 20, 20263.1 s
Jun 27, 20263.2 s
Jul 4, 20263.2 s
Jul 11, 20263.2 s
Jul 18, 20263.3 s
Jul 25, 20263.3 s
Aug 1, 20263.3 s
Aug 8, 20263.3 s
Aug 15, 20263.3 s
Aug 22, 20263.2 s
Aug 29, 20263.2 s
Sep 5, 20263.3 s
Sep 12, 20263.3 s
Sep 19, 20263.3 s
Sep 26, 20263.3 s
Oct 3, 20263.3 s
Oct 10, 20263.3 s
Oct 17, 20263.3 s
Oct 24, 20263.2 s
Oct 31, 20263.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
147 ms134 msMay 16Oct 31137 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026143 ms
May 23, 2026140 ms
May 30, 2026142 ms
Jun 6, 2026145 ms
Jun 13, 2026145 ms
Jun 20, 2026145 ms
Jun 27, 2026145 ms
Jul 4, 2026139 ms
Jul 11, 2026138 ms
Jul 18, 2026138 ms
Jul 25, 2026137 ms
Aug 1, 2026137 ms
Aug 8, 2026137 ms
Aug 15, 2026136 ms
Aug 22, 2026136 ms
Aug 29, 2026135 ms
Sep 5, 2026136 ms
Sep 12, 2026136 ms
Sep 19, 2026138 ms
Sep 26, 2026138 ms
Oct 3, 2026137 ms
Oct 10, 2026138 ms
Oct 17, 2026137 ms
Oct 24, 2026137 ms
Oct 31, 2026137 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of lendi.com.au (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. lendi.com.au at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. lendi.com.au at 1.5 s1.5 s
  3. lendi.com.au at 2.2 s2.2 s
  4. lendi.com.au at 3.0 s3.0 s
  5. lendi.com.au at 3.7 s3.7 s
  6. lendi.com.au at 4.4 s4.4 s
  7. lendi.com.au at 5.2 s5.2 s
  8. lendi.com.au at 5.9 s5.9 s

Speed

13 to fix27
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    8.5 s · 2.8 MB

    About 2.8 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.4 s · 981 KiB

    31 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (981 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.5 s

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.5 s.

  • lendicdn.net adds 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    lendicdn.net costs a phone 1.7 s of main-thread work and 2.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.3 s of main-thread work and 866 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 27

    27/100

    Your mobile performance score is 27. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 9.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 9.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 6.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (lendicdn.net, Google Tag Manager and Amplitude Mobile Analytics and others), adding 5.0 MB and 4.6 s of main-thread time.

  • Amplitude Mobile Analytics adds 746 ms

    746 ms

    Amplitude Mobile Analytics costs a phone 746 ms of main-thread work and 261 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 765 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 139 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 139 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Facebook adds 300 ms

    300 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 300 ms of main-thread work and 197 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Maps adds 122 ms

    122 ms

    Google Maps costs a phone 122 ms of main-thread work and 396 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    150 ms · 46 KiB

    46 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    14 KiB

    14 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 19.7 s

    19.7 s

    Your largest element takes 19.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 39.7 s

    39.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 39.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 14.3 s

    14.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 3.9 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Real visitors wait 3.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • 13 images without width and height

    13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 143 ms to 137 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 138 ms

    138 ms

    Real visitors wait 138 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 719 ms

    719 ms

    Real visitors wait 719 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix33
  • Page weight: 5.7 MB in 238 requests

    5.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.7 MB in 238 requests on a phone: scripts 5.2 MB (61), other files 258 KiB (129) and images 151 KiB (29). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.62 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.62 g of CO₂e: 194.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 6176
  • [role]s are not contained by their required parent element

    [role]s are not contained by their required parent element (23 elements).

  • Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

    Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children. (1 element).

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 8 text elements with low contrast

    8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • Elements use prohibited ARIA attributes

    Elements use prohibited ARIA attributes (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 14 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 17 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 14 passed and 3 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8379
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Structured data has 3 problems

    Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 3 problems, for example “Organization: sameAs is not an absolute URL ("LinkedIn ")”.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 99 characters

    Your meta description is 99 characters: “We make home loans simple by combining smart technology and expertise to find you a better solution”.

  • Title: 32 characters

    Your title is a healthy 32 characters: “Lendi - Your home for home loans”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.lendi.com.au/inspire/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.lendi.com.au/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9292
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'init')”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

7 to fix38
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 0 words

    The homepage has only about 0 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Amplitude.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amplitude (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lendi.com.au, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Gatsby
Analytics
Amplitude
Hosting
CloudFront

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 46 issues on lendi.com.au, including 22 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 7 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25