Website review, no card needed

leprogres.fr logo

leprogres.fr website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202640 issues · 88 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on leprogres.fr, 15 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused CSS. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.0 s1.8 sMay 9Oct 241.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.8 s
May 16, 20261.8 s
May 23, 20261.8 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20261.8 s
Jun 13, 20261.8 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20261.9 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20261.9 s
Jul 18, 20262.0 s
Jul 25, 20262.0 s
Aug 1, 20262.0 s
Aug 8, 20262.0 s
Aug 15, 20262.0 s
Aug 22, 20262.0 s
Aug 29, 20262.0 s
Sep 5, 20262.0 s
Sep 12, 20261.9 s
Sep 19, 20261.9 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20261.9 s
Oct 10, 20261.9 s
Oct 17, 20261.9 s
Oct 24, 20261.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
288 ms201 msMay 9Oct 24258 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026225 ms
May 16, 2026224 ms
May 23, 2026221 ms
May 30, 2026216 ms
Jun 6, 2026213 ms
Jun 13, 2026211 ms
Jun 20, 2026215 ms
Jun 27, 2026223 ms
Jul 4, 2026227 ms
Jul 11, 2026229 ms
Jul 18, 2026229 ms
Jul 25, 2026230 ms
Aug 1, 2026231 ms
Aug 8, 2026238 ms
Aug 15, 2026244 ms
Aug 22, 2026250 ms
Aug 29, 2026254 ms
Sep 5, 2026258 ms
Sep 12, 2026261 ms
Sep 19, 2026269 ms
Sep 26, 2026275 ms
Oct 3, 2026278 ms
Oct 10, 2026278 ms
Oct 17, 2026271 ms
Oct 24, 2026258 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of leprogres.fr (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. leprogres.fr at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. leprogres.fr at 1.3 s1.3 s
  3. leprogres.fr at 2.0 s2.0 s
  4. leprogres.fr at 2.6 s2.6 s
  5. leprogres.fr at 3.3 s3.3 s
  6. leprogres.fr at 4.0 s4.0 s
  7. leprogres.fr at 4.6 s4.6 s
  8. leprogres.fr at 5.3 s5.3 s

Speed

12 to fix50
  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.6 s · 187 KiB

    About 187 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 s · 435 KiB

    About 435 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.6 s

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 1.6 s.

  • 3,908 HTML elements

    The page has 3,908 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (prsmedia.fr, Google Tag Manager and Didomi and others), adding 1.5 MB and 984 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    650 ms · 426 KiB

    55 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (426 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 50

    50/100

    Your mobile performance score is 50. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • prsmedia.fr adds 296 ms

    296 ms

    prsmedia.fr costs a phone 296 ms of main-thread work and 613 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 280 ms

    280 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 280 ms of main-thread work and 199 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 255 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 2.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Didomi adds 210 ms

    210 ms

    Didomi costs a phone 210 ms of main-thread work and 347 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 41 KiB

    4 images could be 41 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 317 ms

    317 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 317 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.5 s

    11.5 s

    Your largest element takes 11.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Bienvenue sur Le Progrès ! Chaque jour, nos journalistes s’…”. Most of its time is element render delay (4.8 s).

  • Time to Interactive: 12.4 s

    12.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 12.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.5 s

    8.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user INP: 287 ms

    287 ms

    Real visitors wait 287 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 483 ms

    483 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 483 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 14 images without width and height

    14 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 18% slower for real visitors

    +18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 225 ms to 258 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.10

    0.10

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.10 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 560 ms

    560 ms

    Real visitors wait 560 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.027

    0.027

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.027, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.50 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.50 g of CO₂e: 60.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.8 MB in 85 requests

    1.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.8 MB in 85 requests on a phone: scripts 994 KiB (24), images 232 KiB (32) and other files 204 KiB (19). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8191
  • 169 buttons without a name

    169 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 3 images without alt text

    3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 276 links without text

    276 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 21 tap targets too small

    21 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 8 form fields without a label

    8 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (12 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 50 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8578
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is long (89 characters)

    Your title is 89 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Le Progrès : info et actu nationale et régionale - Rhône, Loire, Ain, Haute-Loire et Jura”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 641 internal links, 149 external

    The homepage links to 641 pages on leprogres.fr and 149 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 91 characters

    Your meta description is 91 characters: “Actualités A la une générale : en direct, photos et vidéos. Restez informés avec Le Progrès”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.leprogres.fr/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: NewsMediaOrganization.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.leprogres.fr/sitemap-request.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix65
  • robots.txt blocks 1 AI answer engine crawler

    1 of 6

    Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.

  • Opted out of AI training for 3 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, Google-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.

2 checks passed
  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (4,634 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.leprogres.fr/nos-offres-abonnements, whose canonical is https://www.leprogres.fr/nos-offres-abonnements?utm_source=meta&utm_medium=social_ads&utm_campaign=OP_FilRouge_Abonnement_MID&utm_content=Kit1_05_NoIA. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 193 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 1 page that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 1 page that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 6970
  • 2 broken images

    2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.leprogres.fr/.

  • 9 small tap targets

    9 of 37 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://accounts.google.com/gsi/style' from origin 'https://www.leprogres.fr' has been blo…”.

  • 4 low-resolution images

    4 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Requests the geolocation permission on page load

    Requests the geolocation permission on page load.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • A 13-field form

    Your longest form asks for 13 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 549 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 549 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 2 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Ads (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Didomi) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 17 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Didomi

    A consent management tool (Didomi) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at leprogres.fr, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on leprogres.fr, including 20 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25