Website review, no card needed

lesnereides.com logo

lesnereides.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202635 issues · 79 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on lesnereides.com, 18 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.8 s2.4 sMay 2Oct 173.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.7 s
May 9, 20262.7 s
May 16, 20262.8 s
May 23, 20262.8 s
May 30, 20262.9 s
Jun 6, 20262.9 s
Jun 13, 20262.9 s
Jun 20, 20262.8 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20262.6 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.7 s
Jul 25, 20262.7 s
Aug 1, 20262.8 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20262.7 s
Aug 22, 20262.8 s
Aug 29, 20262.9 s
Sep 5, 20263.0 s
Sep 12, 20263.2 s
Sep 19, 20263.4 s
Sep 26, 20263.5 s
Oct 3, 20263.6 s
Oct 10, 20263.6 s
Oct 17, 20263.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
166 ms141 msMay 2Oct 17162 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026144 ms
May 9, 2026145 ms
May 16, 2026145 ms
May 23, 2026146 ms
May 30, 2026147 ms
Jun 6, 2026149 ms
Jun 13, 2026152 ms
Jun 20, 2026151 ms
Jun 27, 2026154 ms
Jul 4, 2026153 ms
Jul 11, 2026153 ms
Jul 18, 2026153 ms
Jul 25, 2026149 ms
Aug 1, 2026150 ms
Aug 8, 2026151 ms
Aug 15, 2026149 ms
Aug 22, 2026154 ms
Aug 29, 2026157 ms
Sep 5, 2026156 ms
Sep 12, 2026157 ms
Sep 19, 2026160 ms
Sep 26, 2026161 ms
Oct 3, 2026163 ms
Oct 10, 2026162 ms
Oct 17, 2026162 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of lesnereides.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. lesnereides.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. lesnereides.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. lesnereides.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. lesnereides.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  5. lesnereides.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  6. lesnereides.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  7. lesnereides.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  8. lesnereides.com at 3.2 s3.2 s

Speed

12 to fix49
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.8 s · 539 KiB

    About 539 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 49

    49/100

    Your mobile performance score is 49 (desktop: 59). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 4,284 HTML elements

    The page has 4,284 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Shopify and 506.io and others), adding 926 KiB and 848 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    550 ms · 84 KiB

    15 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (84 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    450 ms

    12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 450 ms.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 396 ms

    396 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 396 ms of main-thread work and 353 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 21 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 19 KiB

    About 19 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 314 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    251 KiB

    10 images could be 251 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 24 KiB

    24 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 11 ms

    11 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 11 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 5.1 s

    5.1 s

    Real visitors wait 5.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 5.1 s

    5.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 5.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 22.1 s

    22.1 s

    Your largest element takes 22.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 23.1 s

    23.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 23.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.9 s

    4.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.1 s

    8.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 33% slower for real visitors

    +33%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 3.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 379 ms

    379 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 379 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 12% slower for real visitors

    +12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 144 ms to 162 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 145 ms

    145 ms

    Real visitors wait 145 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 392 ms

    392 ms

    Real visitors wait 392 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 5.1 MB in 397 requests

    5.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.1 MB in 397 requests on a phone: images 2.5 MB (93), scripts 1.2 MB (73) and other files 1.1 MB (209). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.44 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.44 g of CO₂e: 173.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8791
  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 4 text elements with low contrast

    4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10095
  • Meta description is long (213 characters)

    Your meta description is 213 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 346 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 346 pages on lesnereides.com and 8 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Les Néréides”.

  • Title: 32 characters

    Your title is a healthy 32 characters: “Les Néréides Boutique Officielle”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.lesnereides.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.lesnereides.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,930 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.lesnereides.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 5 pages without a meta description

    https://www.lesnereides.com/collections/offre-les-nereides-x-huawei-freeclip-2-et-2-s, https://www.lesnereides.com/pages/les-pendentifs, https://www.lesnereides.com/pages/les-nereides-x-huawei-freeclip2, https://www.lesnereides.com/pages/opera-qr and https://www.lesnereides.com/pages/collaboration-chateau-de-versailles have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 164 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught TypeError: Cannot assign to read only property 'exec' of object '[object RegExp]'”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    312 of 317 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,747 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,747 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact”.

  • 83 short forms

    83 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Hotjar.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 19 cookies set on arrival

    19

    Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 46 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 46 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lesnereides.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Hotjar

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on lesnereides.com, including 21 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25