Website review, no card needed

leucine.io logo

leucine.io website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202635 issues · 74 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on leucine.io, 14 of them high impact, across 74 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.4 s2.3 sMay 2Oct 173.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.7 s
May 9, 20262.6 s
May 16, 20262.6 s
May 23, 20262.4 s
May 30, 20262.5 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.5 s
Jun 20, 20262.8 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20262.7 s
Jul 11, 20262.8 s
Jul 18, 20262.7 s
Jul 25, 20262.8 s
Aug 1, 20262.9 s
Aug 8, 20262.7 s
Aug 15, 20262.7 s
Aug 22, 20262.7 s
Aug 29, 20262.7 s
Sep 5, 20262.7 s
Sep 12, 20262.7 s
Sep 19, 20262.8 s
Sep 26, 20263.0 s
Oct 3, 20263.1 s
Oct 10, 20263.2 s
Oct 17, 20263.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
139 ms89 msMay 2Oct 1799 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026126 ms
May 9, 2026126 ms
May 16, 2026133 ms
May 23, 2026128 ms
May 30, 2026124 ms
Jun 6, 2026124 ms
Jun 13, 2026127 ms
Jun 20, 2026132 ms
Jun 27, 2026129 ms
Jul 4, 2026131 ms
Jul 11, 2026131 ms
Jul 18, 2026122 ms
Jul 25, 2026128 ms
Aug 1, 2026132 ms
Aug 8, 2026130 ms
Aug 15, 2026132 ms
Aug 22, 2026126 ms
Aug 29, 2026117 ms
Sep 5, 202699 ms
Sep 12, 202695 ms
Sep 19, 202695 ms
Sep 26, 202696 ms
Oct 3, 2026101 ms
Oct 10, 202699 ms
Oct 17, 202699 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of leucine.io (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. leucine.io at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. leucine.io at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. leucine.io at 1.9 s1.9 s
  4. leucine.io at 2.5 s2.5 s
  5. leucine.io at 3.1 s3.1 s
  6. leucine.io at 3.7 s3.7 s
  7. leucine.io at 4.4 s4.4 s
  8. leucine.io at 5.0 s5.0 s

Speed

5 to fix52
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.6 s · 318 KiB

    About 318 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Avoid multiple page redirects

    1.1 s

    The page goes through 1 redirect before it starts loading, costing about 1.1 s. Link and advertise the final URL directly.

  • Mobile performance score: 52

    52/100

    Your mobile performance score is 52 (desktop: 74). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Main-thread work: 3.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 557 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google Fonts adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    Google Fonts costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 359 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 127 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, consentpro.com and website-files.com and others), adding 748 KiB and 22 ms of main-thread time.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 36 ms

    36 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 36 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

13 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 7.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 14.0 s

    14.0 s

    Your largest element takes 14.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 14.0 s

    14.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 14.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 253 ms

    253 ms

    Real visitors wait 253 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.12

    0.12

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.12 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 24% slower for real visitors

    +24%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 287 ms

    287 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 287 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

2 checks passed
  • Tap response (INP) got 21% faster for real visitors

    -21%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 126 ms to 99 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.034

    0.034

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.034, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 10.0 MB in 93 requests

    10.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 10.0 MB in 93 requests on a phone: media 7.8 MB (2), scripts 1.1 MB (51) and images 451 KiB (17). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (37 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 2.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.83 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.83 g of CO₂e: 339.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 9090
  • 34 text elements with low contrast

    34 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 4 tap targets too small

    4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (3 elements)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (2 elements)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 138 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9290
  • Title is short (23 characters)

    Your title is only 23 characters: “Leucine | AI for Pharma”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 93 internal links, 14 external

    The homepage links to 93 pages on leucine.io and 14 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 154 characters

    Your meta description is 154 characters: “Leucine's AI-powered platform delivers compliant, transformative solutions to streamline pharma manufacturing, enhance …”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Experience the future of Pharma Manufacturing.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.leucine.io/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList and Corporation.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.leucine.io/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,920 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.leucine.io/llms.txt (3 KiB, 0 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 4 pages share 2 titles

    https://www.leucine.io/products/electronic-logbook-software and https://www.leucine.io/products/instrument-logbooks all use the title “Electronic Logbook Software for Pharma | Leucine MES”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 4 pages share a meta description

    https://www.leucine.io/products/electronic-logbook-software and https://www.leucine.io/products/instrument-logbooks use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://www.leucine.io/products/qms-software and https://www.leucine.io/products/les-software have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 32 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    11 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 11 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 11 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 23 small tap targets

    23 of 34 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Consent Pro: not available for production use. Please purchase a plan at https://my.finsweet.com/plans/create/consent-p…”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix80
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 24 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,551 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,551 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Schedule a demo” and “Contact Sales”.

  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Schedule a Demo”, “Request a Demo” and “Request Consultation”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and HubSpot.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 14 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at leucine.io, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Framework
Tailwind CSS
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on leucine.io, including 18 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25