Website review, no card needed

lff.lv logo

lff.lv website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202634 issues · 84 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on lff.lv, 13 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
894 ms749 msMay 2Oct 17766 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 2026770 ms
May 9, 2026773 ms
May 16, 2026778 ms
May 23, 2026791 ms
May 30, 2026807 ms
Jun 6, 2026820 ms
Jun 13, 2026827 ms
Jun 20, 2026822 ms
Jun 27, 2026835 ms
Jul 4, 2026844 ms
Jul 11, 2026853 ms
Jul 18, 2026877 ms
Jul 25, 2026864 ms
Aug 1, 2026848 ms
Aug 8, 2026841 ms
Aug 15, 2026844 ms
Aug 22, 2026847 ms
Aug 29, 2026850 ms
Sep 5, 2026848 ms
Sep 12, 2026838 ms
Sep 19, 2026828 ms
Sep 26, 2026809 ms
Oct 3, 2026804 ms
Oct 10, 2026780 ms
Oct 17, 2026766 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
121 ms101 msMay 2Oct 17116 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026103 ms
May 9, 2026103 ms
May 16, 2026104 ms
May 23, 2026104 ms
May 30, 2026105 ms
Jun 6, 2026105 ms
Jun 13, 2026106 ms
Jun 20, 2026106 ms
Jun 27, 2026107 ms
Jul 4, 2026109 ms
Jul 11, 2026110 ms
Jul 18, 2026111 ms
Jul 25, 2026111 ms
Aug 1, 2026111 ms
Aug 8, 2026112 ms
Aug 15, 2026115 ms
Aug 22, 2026118 ms
Aug 29, 2026119 ms
Sep 5, 2026119 ms
Sep 12, 2026117 ms
Sep 19, 2026116 ms
Sep 26, 2026116 ms
Oct 3, 2026117 ms
Oct 10, 2026116 ms
Oct 17, 2026116 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of lff.lv (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. lff.lv at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. lff.lv at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. lff.lv at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. lff.lv at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. lff.lv at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. lff.lv at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. lff.lv at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. lff.lv at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

8 to fix66
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.9 s · 4.0 MB

    96 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4.0 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    1.4 s · 982 KiB

    27 images could be 982 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.1 s

    27 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.1 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 s · 283 KiB

    About 283 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 66

    66/100

    Your mobile performance score is 66 (desktop: 75). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Hotjar and others), adding 851 KiB and 542 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 337 ms

    337 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 337 ms of main-thread work and 491 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,281 HTML elements

    The page has 2,281 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 136 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    37 KiB

    About 37 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 563 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 15.4 s

    15.4 s

    Your largest element takes 15.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 15.7 s

    15.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 5.4 s

    5.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 24 images without width and height

    24 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 13% slower for real visitors

    +13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 103 ms to 116 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.8 s to 0.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 109 ms

    109 ms

    Real visitors wait 109 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 465 ms

    465 ms

    Real visitors wait 465 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 184 ms

    184 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 184 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix43
  • Page weight: 5.0 MB in 142 requests

    5.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.0 MB in 142 requests on a phone: images 3.8 MB (68), scripts 875 KiB (29) and fonts 240 KiB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 22 images below the first screen load straight away

    22 images further down the page (1,008 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 14 images in older formats

    14 images (819 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    121 KiB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 40aaa7f984f9f3e3ca2d0594379c68c38e699a40_0_220_t.png at 352 px wide, shown at 60 px. Resized copies would save about 121 KiB.

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.41 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.41 g of CO₂e: 168.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 9192
  • 25 text elements with low contrast

    25 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 10 links without text

    10 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (6 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings should not be empty (3 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h2 → h5 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 59 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10081
  • Title is short (27 characters)

    Your title is only 27 characters: “Latvijas Futbola federācija”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://lff.lv/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 156 internal links, 68 external

    The homepage links to 156 pages on lff.lv and 68 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 71 characters

    Your meta description is 71 characters: “Oficiālā Latvijas Futbola federācijas vietne. Vieta, kur dzīvo futbols.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Latvijas Futbola federācija”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://lff.lv/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (869 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 7 pages without a meta description

    https://lff.lv/arhivs, https://lff.lv/izlases/nacionala-izlase/izlases-jaunumi, https://lff.lv/izlases/nacionala-izlase/stadions, https://lff.lv/izlases/nacionala-izlase/2026-gada-fifa-pasaules-kausa-kvalifikacija, https://lff.lv/izlases/jaunatnes-izlases/u-18 and https://lff.lv/izlases/jaunatnes-izlases/u-16 and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 pages share a meta description

    https://lff.lv/izlases/nacionala-izlase/statistika and https://lff.lv/izlases/sieviesu-izlases/statistika use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 139 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9684
  • 4 broken images

    4 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://sportland.lv/media/catalog/product/cache/a93584b4c19196955ba77379dc459454/I/Q/IQ2400_adcd.jpg.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    17 of 17 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix40
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 513 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 513 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Hotjar.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 22 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 22 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: CookieYes

    A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lff.lv, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Hotjar

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on lff.lv, including 13 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25