Website review, no card needed
lime-energy.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202637 issues · 86 checks
This review found 37 issues worth fixing on lime-energy.com, 17 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 71 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 73 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 74 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 76 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 75 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 72 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 78 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
8.4 s · 1.6 MB3 images could be 1.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.4 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
4.8 s13 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.8 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.9 s · 737 KiBAbout 737 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.9 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
1.4 s · 263 KiBAbout 263 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
1.2 s · 242 KiB242 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.1 s · 112 KiB6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (112 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 59
59/100Your mobile performance score is 59 (desktop: 73). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Minify CSS
300 ms · 39 KiB39 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Google Tag Manager adds 227 ms
227 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 227 ms of main-thread work and 310 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and termly.io and others), adding 642 KiB and 425 ms of main-thread time.
Font display
150 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 80 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.1 s
A phone's processor spends 1.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 514 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 21 ms
21 msYour server sent the HTML in 21 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 25.1 s
25.1 sYour largest element takes 25.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Mantis Innovation Is Joining Willdan Press Release”.
Time to Interactive: 25.4 s
25.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 25.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.3 s
5.3 sThe first text or image appears after 5.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.2 s
7.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.11
0.11For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.11 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
8 images without width and height
8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 71 ms to 78 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 505 ms
505 msReal visitors wait 505 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 11% faster for real visitors
-11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 39 ms
39 msScripts block the page for only 39 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.9 MB in 83 requests
4.9 MBYour homepage downloads 4.9 MB in 83 requests on a phone: images 3.1 MB (26), scripts 1.3 MB (19) and stylesheets 334 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
10 images in older formats
10 images (1.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
10 images below the first screen load straight away
10 images further down the page (1.8 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
1 image far larger than shown
45 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Minnesota State Capitol 2017.jpg at 1,198 px wide, shown at 360 px. Resized copies would save about 45 KiB.
About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit
1.39 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.39 g of CO₂e: 166.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
23 text elements with low contrast
23 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (10 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (2 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
39 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 9 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
9 links with vague text
9 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
118 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 118 pages on lime-energy.com and 5 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 142 characters
Your meta description is 142 characters: “Willdan transitions communities to clean energy and a sustainable future through industry-leading engineering, energy, …”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Mantis Innovation”.
Title: 45 characters
Your title is a healthy 45 characters: “Willdan | Energy and Infrastructure Solutions”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.willdan.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.willdan.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.willdan.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (980 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
9 pages share a meta description
https://www.willdan.com/clientLinks.aspx, https://www.willdan.com/vendors.aspx, https://www.willdan.com/solutions/energy-programs.aspx, https://www.willdan.com/solutions/municipal-services.aspx, https://www.willdan.com/solutions/grid-optimization.aspx and https://www.willdan.com/solutions/energy-efficiency.aspx and 3 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
15 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 15 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.willdan.com/clientLinks.aspx, whose canonical is https://www.willdan.com/clientlinks. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 63 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
10 small tap targets
10 of 27 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'PageRequestManager')”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
About 895 words of copy
The homepage carries about 895 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Join Us”, “Learn more” and “Contact Us”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Termly) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
10 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Termly
A consent management tool (Termly) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lime-energy.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 37 issues on lime-energy.com, including 16 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.