Website review, no card needed

liqid.com logo

liqid.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202625 issues · 74 checks

This review found 25 issues worth fixing on liqid.com, 7 of them high impact, across 74 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.7 s2.1 sMay 2Oct 172.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.9 s
May 9, 20262.9 s
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.5 s
May 30, 20262.8 s
Jun 6, 20263.2 s
Jun 13, 20263.3 s
Jun 20, 20263.2 s
Jun 27, 20263.4 s
Jul 4, 20263.5 s
Jul 11, 20263.3 s
Jul 18, 20263.3 s
Jul 25, 20262.9 s
Aug 1, 20262.8 s
Aug 8, 20262.9 s
Aug 15, 20263.2 s
Aug 22, 20263.3 s
Aug 29, 20263.5 s
Sep 5, 20263.5 s
Sep 12, 20263.1 s
Sep 19, 20262.9 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20262.7 s
Oct 10, 20262.5 s
Oct 17, 20262.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
109 ms74 msMay 2Oct 1787 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202690 ms
May 9, 202695 ms
May 16, 202687 ms
May 23, 202695 ms
May 30, 202698 ms
Jun 6, 202699 ms
Jun 13, 202697 ms
Jun 20, 202696 ms
Jun 27, 202696 ms
Jul 4, 202691 ms
Jul 11, 2026101 ms
Jul 18, 202694 ms
Jul 25, 2026103 ms
Aug 1, 2026103 ms
Aug 8, 202698 ms
Aug 15, 202696 ms
Aug 22, 202697 ms
Aug 29, 2026105 ms
Sep 5, 202694 ms
Sep 12, 202694 ms
Sep 19, 202681 ms
Sep 26, 202678 ms
Oct 3, 202684 ms
Oct 10, 202688 ms
Oct 17, 202687 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of liqid.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. liqid.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. liqid.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. liqid.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. liqid.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. liqid.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. liqid.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. liqid.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. liqid.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

7 to fix62
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.2 s · 272 KiB

    About 272 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 62

    62/100

    Your mobile performance score is 62 (desktop: 91). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (website-files.com, Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot and others), adding 1.1 MB and 478 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    450 ms · 82 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (82 KiB).

  • website-files.com adds 309 ms

    309 ms

    website-files.com costs a phone 309 ms of main-thread work and 762 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,844 HTML elements

    The page has 1,844 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 48 KiB

    About 48 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 165 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 91 but mobile only 62. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Improve image delivery

    5 KiB

    1 image could be 5 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 513 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 8.5 s

    8.5 s

    Your largest element takes 8.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “image of liqid rack with memory and gpu pooling”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 8.5 s

    8.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 8.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 4.8 s

    4.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 7 images without width and height

    7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 90 ms to 87 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 88 ms

    88 ms

    Real visitors wait 88 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 540 ms

    540 ms

    Real visitors wait 540 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 15% faster for real visitors

    -15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 163 ms

    163 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 163 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.013

    0.013

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.013, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix97
  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    6aab29d5fa834887e440e0b1_60384f7df89c040356d504fb6eb287d2_LI is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.34 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.34 g of CO₂e: 40.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.2 MB in 43 requests

    1.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.2 MB in 43 requests on a phone: scripts 872 KiB (9), images 145 KiB (24) and fonts 112 KiB (5). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 10098
  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (28 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 28 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 92 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 1 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10090
  • 3 H1 headlines

    There are 3 <h1> headlines (“Memory and GPU Pooling”, “LIQID Unveils Scale-Up AI Platform with AMD” and “LIQID CXL Memory pooling at PNNL’s Large-Scale Co…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (361 characters)

    Your meta description is 361 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 110 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 110 pages on liqid.com and 9 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Title: 43 characters

    Your title is a healthy 43 characters: “LIQID | Memory & GPU Pooling Infrastructure”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.liqid.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: WebPage.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.liqid.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.liqid.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,997 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix78
  • 1 page points its canonical at the homepage

    https://www.liqid.com/old-home declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

  • 2 pages share a title

    / and https://www.liqid.com/old-home all use the title “LIQID | Memory & GPU Pooling Infrastructure”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.liqid.com/resources/sustainability has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 32 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    12 of 14 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 847 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 847 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Sales” and “Request a Demo”.

  • 9 calls to action

    The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Contact Sales”, “Request a Demo” and “Contact”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 18 testimonial or review blocks, 69 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and HubSpot.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at liqid.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 25 issues on liqid.com, including 15 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25