Website review, no card needed

lovebrand.com logo

lovebrand.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 13 November 202633 issues · 85 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on lovebrand.com, 8 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.9 s1.7 sMay 23Nov 72.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20262.8 s
May 30, 20262.5 s
Jun 6, 20262.4 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.4 s
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20262.4 s
Jul 11, 20262.5 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.3 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.0 s
Aug 15, 20261.9 s
Aug 22, 20261.8 s
Aug 29, 20262.0 s
Sep 5, 20262.1 s
Sep 12, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.2 s
Oct 3, 20262.2 s
Oct 10, 20262.3 s
Oct 17, 20262.5 s
Oct 24, 20262.6 s
Oct 31, 20262.6 s
Nov 7, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
158 ms107 msMay 23Nov 7146 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026120 ms
May 30, 2026118 ms
Jun 6, 2026120 ms
Jun 13, 2026120 ms
Jun 20, 2026117 ms
Jun 27, 2026120 ms
Jul 4, 2026117 ms
Jul 11, 2026122 ms
Jul 18, 2026120 ms
Jul 25, 2026117 ms
Aug 1, 2026115 ms
Aug 8, 2026115 ms
Aug 15, 2026113 ms
Aug 22, 2026117 ms
Aug 29, 2026124 ms
Sep 5, 2026129 ms
Sep 12, 2026138 ms
Sep 19, 2026137 ms
Sep 26, 2026137 ms
Oct 3, 2026137 ms
Oct 10, 2026143 ms
Oct 17, 2026152 ms
Oct 24, 2026146 ms
Oct 31, 2026149 ms
Nov 7, 2026146 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of lovebrand.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. lovebrand.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. lovebrand.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. lovebrand.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  4. lovebrand.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  5. lovebrand.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  6. lovebrand.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  7. lovebrand.com at 3.5 s3.5 s
  8. lovebrand.com at 4.1 s4.1 s

Speed

7 to fix75
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.5 s

    10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.5 s.

  • 4,233 HTML elements

    The page has 4,233 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Mobile performance score: 75

    75/100

    Your mobile performance score is 75. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 662 KiB

    18 images could be 662 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, Google Tag Manager and Klaviyo and others), adding 923 KiB and 527 ms of main-thread time.

  • Main-thread work: 2.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Adobe TypeKit adds 1 ms

    1 ms

    Adobe TypeKit costs a phone 1 ms of main-thread work and 307 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 154 KiB

    About 154 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 225 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    113 KiB

    10 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (113 KiB).

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    19 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 80 ms

    80 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 80 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 9.4 s

    9.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 9.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    Your largest element takes 4.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Black and white lifestyle photograph of a woman in a one-pi…”.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 24% slower for real visitors

    +24%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 120 ms to 146 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors wait 1.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.5 s

    5.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 150 ms

    150 ms

    Real visitors wait 150 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 162 ms

    162 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 162 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 6.1 MB in 306 requests

    6.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.1 MB in 306 requests on a phone: media 2.0 MB (1), images 1.9 MB (27) and other files 999 KiB (170). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.74 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.74 g of CO₂e: 208.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9694
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 12 links without text

    12 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 139 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 52 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9289
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 4 H1 headlines

    There are 4 <h1> headlines (“”, “Online Orders (Full-Price Items)” and “In-Store Purchases”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 396 internal links, 18 external

    The homepage links to 396 pages on lovebrand.com and 18 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 146 characters

    Your meta description is 146 characters: “LOVE BRAND & Co. timeless & sustainable mens beachwear. Mens designer swim shorts and resort wear for all the family. M…”.

  • Title: 48 characters

    Your title is a healthy 48 characters: “Luxury Swimwear & Resort Wear – LOVE BRAND & Co.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://lovebrand.com/en-us.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://lovebrand.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (7,467 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://lovebrand.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix93
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://lovebrand.com/en-us/collections/all is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 172 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 33 small tap targets

    33 of 89 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix83
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • About 661 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 661 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us”.

  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Sign up” and “Contact information”.

  • 7 short forms

    7 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 2 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 19 cookies set on arrival

    19

    Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 36 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 36 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lovebrand.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 3 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Littledata The Data Layer · rakutenadvertising.io · klaviyo.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Shopify

Hiring

Hiring
1 open role
Job board
careers page

Company

Headquarters
London

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on lovebrand.com, including 16 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25