Website review, no card needed
macarthurco.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202638 issues · 84 checks
This review found 38 issues worth fixing on macarthurco.com, 15 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
82BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 78 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 79 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 79 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 68 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 69 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 65 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 69 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 69 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 68 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 82 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 65 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 69 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 71 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
1.0 s · 4.0 MB15 images could be 4.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.0 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.9 s2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.
5,144 HTML elements
The page has 5,144 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Mobile performance score: 50
50/100Your mobile performance score is 50 (desktop: 26). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
600 ms · 117 KiBAbout 117 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 347 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 42 KiBAbout 42 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 third-party service on the page
1 third-party service load with your homepage (Google Fonts), adding 10 KiB and 0 ms of main-thread time.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.3 s
A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 531 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 236 ms
236 msYour server sent the HTML in 236 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.3 s
5.3 sYour largest element takes 5.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
First Contentful Paint: 3.9 s
3.9 sThe first text or image appears after 3.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 29% slower for real visitors
+29%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 904 ms
904 msReal visitors wait 904 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 518 ms
518 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 518 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.179
0.179The layout shifts by 0.179 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Time to Interactive: 5.3 s
5.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 5.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 3.9 s
3.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 3.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 62 ms
62 msReal visitors wait 62 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 11% faster for real visitors
-11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 78 ms to 71 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.2 MB in 32 requests
5.2 MBYour homepage downloads 5.2 MB in 32 requests on a phone: images 4.5 MB (24), fonts 354 KiB (4) and scripts 211 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images over 500 KB
3 images weigh 3.7 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
6 images far larger than shown
2.6 MB6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Building.jpg at 4,000 px wide, shown at 370 px. Resized copies would save about 2.6 MB.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (3.7 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit
1.46 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.46 g of CO₂e: 175.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
16 images without alt text
16 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
8 links without text
8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings should not be empty (8 elements)
Headings should not be empty: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
34 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 40 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 34 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.macarthurco.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
16 internal links, 11 external
The homepage links to 16 pages on macarthurco.com and 11 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 134 characters
Your meta description is 134 characters: “MacArthur Company is a supplier of a wide range of construction materials. We have the insight and expertise to help yo…”.
Title: 48 characters
Your title is a healthy 48 characters: “Building Partnerships Since 1913 | MacArthur Co.”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.macarthurco.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
3%A phone browser shows 3,522 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 105. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.macarthurco.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
9 pages without a meta description
https://www.macarthurco.com/locations/mac-el-paso-tx, https://www.macarthurco.com/locations/reno-nv, https://www.macarthurco.com/mechanical-insulation, https://www.macarthurco.com/hvac-fire-protection, https://www.macarthurco.com/commercial-roofing and https://www.macarthurco.com/residential-roofing and 3 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
10 pages without an H1
https://www.macarthurco.com/locations/mac-el-paso-tx, https://www.macarthurco.com/locations/reno-nv, https://www.macarthurco.com/mechanical-insulation, https://www.macarthurco.com/hvac-fire-protection, https://www.macarthurco.com/commercial-roofing and https://www.macarthurco.com/residential-roofing and 4 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
10 pages with very little text
https://www.macarthurco.com/locations/mac-el-paso-tx, https://www.macarthurco.com/locations/reno-nv, https://www.macarthurco.com/mechanical-insulation, https://www.macarthurco.com/hvac-fire-protection, https://www.macarthurco.com/commercial-roofing and https://www.macarthurco.com/residential-roofing and 4 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
12 internal pages checked
We fetched 12 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 12 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
868 of 868 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 3,522 words of copy
The homepage carries about 3,522 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “HVAC Register, Grilles” and “Contact us”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
2 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at macarthurco.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2022.
Stack
- CMS
- Litium
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 38 issues on macarthurco.com, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.