Website review, no card needed

maccaferri.com logo

maccaferri.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202642 issues · 86 checks

This review found 42 issues worth fixing on maccaferri.com, 13 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 14.3 MB in 141 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.8 s3.1 sMay 9Oct 243.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.8 s
May 16, 20263.9 s
May 23, 20264.1 s
May 30, 20264.2 s
Jun 6, 20264.3 s
Jun 13, 20264.4 s
Jun 20, 20264.4 s
Jun 27, 20264.5 s
Jul 4, 20264.5 s
Jul 11, 20264.5 s
Jul 18, 20264.6 s
Jul 25, 20264.6 s
Aug 1, 20264.5 s
Aug 8, 20264.3 s
Aug 15, 20263.9 s
Aug 22, 20263.6 s
Aug 29, 20263.4 s
Sep 5, 20263.5 s
Sep 12, 20263.5 s
Sep 19, 20263.4 s
Sep 26, 20263.4 s
Oct 3, 20263.3 s
Oct 10, 20263.3 s
Oct 17, 20263.5 s
Oct 24, 20263.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
303 ms207 msMay 9Oct 24292 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026256 ms
May 16, 2026255 ms
May 23, 2026247 ms
May 30, 2026244 ms
Jun 6, 2026248 ms
Jun 13, 2026253 ms
Jun 20, 2026265 ms
Jun 27, 2026272 ms
Jul 4, 2026273 ms
Jul 11, 2026271 ms
Jul 18, 2026268 ms
Jul 25, 2026264 ms
Aug 1, 2026259 ms
Aug 8, 2026245 ms
Aug 15, 2026232 ms
Aug 22, 2026224 ms
Aug 29, 2026218 ms
Sep 5, 2026234 ms
Sep 12, 2026241 ms
Sep 19, 2026243 ms
Sep 26, 2026251 ms
Oct 3, 2026250 ms
Oct 10, 2026261 ms
Oct 17, 2026277 ms
Oct 24, 2026292 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of maccaferri.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. maccaferri.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. maccaferri.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  3. maccaferri.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  4. maccaferri.com at 3.8 s3.8 s
  5. maccaferri.com at 4.8 s4.8 s
  6. maccaferri.com at 5.8 s5.8 s
  7. maccaferri.com at 6.7 s6.7 s
  8. maccaferri.com at 7.7 s7.7 s

Speed

16 to fix30
  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.2 s of main-thread work and 562 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 30

    30/100

    Your mobile performance score is 30 (desktop: 69). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 8.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 8.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 3,614 HTML elements

    The page has 3,614 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and indigo.ai and others), adding 13.6 MB and 2.3 s of main-thread time.

  • imagekit.io adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    imagekit.io costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 11.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    600 ms · 454 KiB

    7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (454 KiB).

  • Document request latency

    550 ms · 404 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive about 550 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    320 ms · 629 KiB

    About 629 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 320 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    100 ms · 693 KiB

    21 images could be 693 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    700 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 700 ms.

  • Reduce initial server response time

    531 ms

    Reduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 531 ms on a phone.

  • 18 long tasks on the main thread

    18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 519 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Facebook adds 468 ms

    468 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 468 ms of main-thread work and 282 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • indigo.ai adds 352 ms

    352 ms

    indigo.ai costs a phone 352 ms of main-thread work and 587 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Server response: 631 ms

    631 ms

    Your server takes 631 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    231 KiB

    About 231 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 15 KiB

    15 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Minify JavaScript

    21 KiB

    21 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 69 but mobile only 30. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 20.0 s

    20.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 20.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.2 s

    6.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    Your largest element takes 7.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Engineers for climate change adaptation”.

  • Speed Index: 11.3 s

    11.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Real visitors wait 2.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 274 ms

    274 ms

    Real visitors wait 274 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 256 ms to 292 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.8 s to 3.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.007

    0.007

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.007, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 14.3 MB in 141 requests

    14.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 14.3 MB in 141 requests on a phone: images 6.2 MB (76), media 5.7 MB (4) and scripts 1.4 MB (10). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 4.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.05 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.05 g of CO₂e: 485.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9796
  • 11 tap targets too small

    11 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 169 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 2 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9277
  • Title is short (21 characters)

    Your title is only 21 characters: “HomePage | Maccaferri”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is short (8 characters)

    Your meta description is only 8 characters: “HomePage”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Engineers for climate change adaptation” and “Ask Maccaferri”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 27 links with vague text

    27 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 484 internal links, 17 external

    The homepage links to 484 pages on maccaferri.com and 17 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.maccaferri.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.maccaferri.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.maccaferri.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,267 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.maccaferri.com/contact-us has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 172 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7785
  • 16 small tap targets

    16 of 36 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix70
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 7 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,157 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,157 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Contact Us” and “Subscribe”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 16 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at maccaferri.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Company

Founded
1879
Headquarters
Zola Predosa

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 42 issues on maccaferri.com, including 26 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25