Website review, no card needed

mayca.com logo

mayca.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202639 issues · 81 checks

This review found 39 issues worth fixing on mayca.com, 12 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.5 s3.1 sMay 16Oct 313.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.5 s
May 23, 20263.5 s
May 30, 20263.5 s
Jun 6, 20263.4 s
Jun 13, 20263.3 s
Jun 20, 20263.3 s
Jun 27, 20263.4 s
Jul 4, 20263.4 s
Jul 11, 20263.5 s
Jul 18, 20263.4 s
Jul 25, 20263.4 s
Aug 1, 20263.4 s
Aug 8, 20263.3 s
Aug 15, 20263.3 s
Aug 22, 20263.3 s
Aug 29, 20263.2 s
Sep 5, 20263.2 s
Sep 12, 20263.2 s
Sep 19, 20263.2 s
Sep 26, 20263.2 s
Oct 3, 20263.2 s
Oct 10, 20263.2 s
Oct 17, 20263.2 s
Oct 24, 20263.3 s
Oct 31, 20263.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
219 ms174 msMay 16Oct 31214 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026179 ms
May 23, 2026181 ms
May 30, 2026187 ms
Jun 6, 2026191 ms
Jun 13, 2026192 ms
Jun 20, 2026193 ms
Jun 27, 2026195 ms
Jul 4, 2026196 ms
Jul 11, 2026198 ms
Jul 18, 2026201 ms
Jul 25, 2026201 ms
Aug 1, 2026204 ms
Aug 8, 2026206 ms
Aug 15, 2026208 ms
Aug 22, 2026209 ms
Aug 29, 2026210 ms
Sep 5, 2026211 ms
Sep 12, 2026211 ms
Sep 19, 2026211 ms
Sep 26, 2026209 ms
Oct 3, 2026206 ms
Oct 10, 2026209 ms
Oct 17, 2026212 ms
Oct 24, 2026213 ms
Oct 31, 2026214 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of mayca.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. mayca.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. mayca.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. mayca.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. mayca.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. mayca.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. mayca.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. mayca.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. mayca.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

11 to fix39
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 39

    39/100

    Your mobile performance score is 39. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 8.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 8.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and survicate-cdn.com and others), adding 1.2 MB and 1.8 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    710 ms · 637 KiB

    About 637 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 710 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    970 ms · 191 KiB

    About 191 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 970 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 926 ms

    926 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 926 ms of main-thread work and 524 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 915 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 327 KiB

    16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (327 KiB).

  • Facebook adds 260 ms

    260 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 260 ms of main-thread work and 225 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,781 HTML elements

    The page has 2,781 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    20 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 20 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 16 ms

    16 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 16 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 19.1 s

    19.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 19.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.5 s

    7.5 s

    Your largest element takes 7.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “E-Commerce Tenga acceso a nuestro portafolio y compre en lí…”.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 7.3 s

    7.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user INP: 232 ms

    232 ms

    Real visitors wait 232 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 817 ms

    817 ms

    Real visitors wait 817 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 19% slower for real visitors

    +19%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 179 ms to 214 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.5 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.2 MB in 326 requests

    2.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.2 MB in 326 requests on a phone: scripts 1.7 MB (248), stylesheets 179 KiB (5) and images 97 KiB (12). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.61 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.61 g of CO₂e: 73.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8994
  • 19 text elements with low contrast

    19 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 3 tap targets too small

    3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 15 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 10067
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (29 characters)

    Your title is only 29 characters: “Homepage - Mayca Food Service”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Meta description is short (29 characters)

    Your meta description is only 29 characters: “Homepage - Mayca Food Service”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.mayca.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 605 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 605 pages on mayca.com and 6 external pages.

2 checks passed
  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) and description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,745 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.mayca.com/llms.txt (4 KiB, 0 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 6 pages share a title

    https://www.mayca.com/purchaseorder/purchaseorder, https://www.mayca.com/customer/address, https://www.mayca.com/sales/order/history, https://www.mayca.com/negotiable_quote/quote, https://www.mayca.com/requisition_list/requisition/index and https://www.mayca.com/company all use the title “Inicio de sesión de cliente”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 9 pages share a meta description

    https://www.mayca.com/stores, https://www.mayca.com/asesor/index/solicitar, https://www.mayca.com/contact, https://www.mayca.com/purchaseorder/purchaseorder, https://www.mayca.com/customer/address and https://www.mayca.com/sales/order/history and 3 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 6 pages without an H1

    https://www.mayca.com/food-service, https://www.mayca.com/franquicias, https://www.mayca.com/centro-gastronomico, https://www.mayca.com/trayectoria, https://www.mayca.com/mayca-plus and https://www.mayca.com/comprar have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 195 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9287
  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 14 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Sending form data to 'https://www.facebook.com/tr/' violates the following report-only Content Security Policy directiv…”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix79
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Only about 155 words

    The homepage has only about 155 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

5 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Call center 4100-4200”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block and 2 customer or partner logos.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity and Hotjar.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 24 cookies set on arrival

    24

    Opening the homepage sets 24 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 28 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 28 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mayca.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Magento
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Hotjar | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Fastly

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 39 issues on mayca.com, including 20 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25