Website review, no card needed
materialbank.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202637 issues · 89 checks
This review found 37 issues worth fixing on materialbank.com, 18 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
Read the full growth playbook for Material Bank
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75C- #61,532 of 93,515 reviewed websitesbeats 30%
- #37,013 of 49,970 online storesbeats 22%
- #240 of 625 Magento storesbeats 55%
Closest competitors among Magento stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 147 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 146 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 137 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.5 s
1.0 s
1.4 s
1.9 s
2.4 s
2.9 s
3.4 s
3.9 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.8 s · 6.5 MB39 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (6.5 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.8 s · 1.7 MBAbout 1.7 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.8 s faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
2.2 s · 685 KiB19 images could be 685 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.2 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.1 s3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.
Mobile performance score: 35
35/100Your mobile performance score is 35. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.1 s
A phone's processor spends 5.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Intercom and Constructor.io and others), adding 9.0 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.
Fastly adds 63 ms
63 msFastly costs a phone 63 ms of main-thread work and 7.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 744 ms
744 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 744 ms of main-thread work and 551 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Duplicated JavaScript
500 ms · 99 KiB99 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 266 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 56 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 56 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 36 KiBAbout 36 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
22 KiB22 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 32 ms
32 msYour server sent the HTML in 32 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 15.5 s
15.5 sYour largest element takes 15.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 26.8 s
26.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 26.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.1 s
9.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.3 s
1.3 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.3 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.14
0.14For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.14 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 2.8 s
2.8 sThe first text or image appears after 2.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
25 images without width and height
25 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 147 ms to 137 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 138 ms
138 msReal visitors wait 138 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 773 ms
773 msReal visitors wait 773 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 13% faster for real visitors
-13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.095
0.095The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.095, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 11.3 MB in 147 requests
11.3 MBYour homepage downloads 11.3 MB in 147 requests on a phone: media 6.5 MB (1), scripts 3.1 MB (79) and images 1.4 MB (33). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
4 images far larger than shown
311 KiB4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example For_manufacturers.png at 720 px wide, shown at 160 px. Resized copies would save about 311 KiB.
5 images below the first screen load straight away
5 images further down the page (560 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 3.2 g of CO₂ per visit
3.21 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.21 g of CO₂e: 384.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
20 text elements with low contrast
20 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
7 images without alt text
7 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
4 links with vague text
4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
25 internal links, 11 external
The homepage links to 25 pages on materialbank.com and 11 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 152 characters
Your meta description is 152 characters: “Search and order free material samples from Material Bank. Register as a professional to search across the best design …”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Search. Sample. Specify.”.
Title: 60 characters
Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “Order Design & Architectural Product Samples | Material Bank”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.materialbank.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.materialbank.com/media/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.materialbank.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (599 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages without a title
https://www.materialbank.com/orders and https://www.materialbank.com/returns have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
2 linked pages hidden from search
https://www.materialbank.com/orders and https://www.materialbank.com/returns are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages without a meta description
https://www.materialbank.com/orders and https://www.materialbank.com/returns have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages without an H1
https://www.materialbank.com/orders and https://www.materialbank.com/returns have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page slow to respond
https://www.materialbank.com/returns took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
10 internal pages checked
We fetched 10 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
2 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 10 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Best practices
2 broken images
2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=211019972&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=4632fd0a-bf47-4cc0-a93e-743cd212b369&bo=1&sid=966d6d50d89811f19994d7f738336e18&vid=966d65c0d89811f193edc98fdbedaf74&vids=1&msclkid=N>m_.
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
8 of 9 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 417 words of copy
The homepage carries about 417 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Join for free”.
19 calls to action
The homepage has 19 calls to action, for example “Sign up for free”, “Order free samples now” and “Try AI Search”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 3 email links.
Privacy and tracking
9 trackers load before any consent
9Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and HubSpot and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
23 cookies set on arrival
23Opening the homepage sets 23 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
41 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 41 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at materialbank.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- E-commerce
- Magento
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 37 issues on materialbank.com, including 19 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.