Website review, no card needed

mbu.edu logo

mbu.edu website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202648 issues · 91 checks

This review found 48 issues worth fixing on mbu.edu, 21 of them high impact, across 91 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.0 s2.9 sMay 9Oct 244.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.1 s
May 16, 20263.1 s
May 23, 20263.2 s
May 30, 20263.3 s
Jun 6, 20263.4 s
Jun 13, 20263.5 s
Jun 20, 20263.6 s
Jun 27, 20263.6 s
Jul 4, 20263.7 s
Jul 11, 20263.7 s
Jul 18, 20263.6 s
Jul 25, 20263.6 s
Aug 1, 20263.7 s
Aug 8, 20263.8 s
Aug 15, 20263.9 s
Aug 22, 20264.0 s
Aug 29, 20263.9 s
Sep 5, 20264.0 s
Sep 12, 20264.1 s
Sep 19, 20264.2 s
Sep 26, 20264.4 s
Oct 3, 20264.5 s
Oct 10, 20264.7 s
Oct 17, 20264.8 s
Oct 24, 20264.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
109 ms90 msMay 9Oct 2496 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026103 ms
May 16, 2026101 ms
May 23, 2026100 ms
May 30, 2026100 ms
Jun 6, 2026104 ms
Jun 13, 2026103 ms
Jun 20, 2026105 ms
Jun 27, 2026107 ms
Jul 4, 2026107 ms
Jul 11, 2026107 ms
Jul 18, 2026107 ms
Jul 25, 2026107 ms
Aug 1, 2026104 ms
Aug 8, 2026106 ms
Aug 15, 2026104 ms
Aug 22, 2026103 ms
Aug 29, 202697 ms
Sep 5, 202694 ms
Sep 12, 202694 ms
Sep 19, 202692 ms
Sep 26, 202694 ms
Oct 3, 202695 ms
Oct 10, 202696 ms
Oct 17, 202697 ms
Oct 24, 202696 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of mbu.edu (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. mbu.edu at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. mbu.edu at 1.4 s1.4 s
  3. mbu.edu at 2.2 s2.2 s
  4. mbu.edu at 2.9 s2.9 s
  5. mbu.edu at 3.6 s3.6 s
  6. mbu.edu at 4.3 s4.3 s
  7. mbu.edu at 5.0 s5.0 s
  8. mbu.edu at 5.8 s5.8 s

Speed

11 to fix31
  • Improve image delivery

    3.4 s · 9.2 MB

    34 images could be 9.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    7.2 s · 5.1 MB

    118 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5.1 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.5 s

    37 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.5 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.1 s · 232 KiB

    About 232 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.1 s · 219 KiB

    About 219 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 31

    31/100

    Your mobile performance score is 31. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 14 long tasks on the main thread

    14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.0 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Cloudflare CDN and others), adding 542 KiB and 583 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 317 ms

    317 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 317 ms of main-thread work and 310 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,626 HTML elements

    The page has 1,626 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 13 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 25 ms

    25 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 25 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 30.8 s

    30.8 s

    Your largest element takes 30.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 31.8 s

    31.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 31.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.7 s

    9.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.8 s

    4.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.5 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 51% slower for real visitors

    +51%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 4.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • 17 images without width and height

    17 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 103 ms to 96 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 113 ms

    113 ms

    Real visitors wait 113 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.07

    0.07

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 785 ms

    785 ms

    Real visitors wait 785 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.014

    0.014

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.014, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 13.1 MB in 138 requests

    13.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 13.1 MB in 138 requests on a phone: images 11.4 MB (50), scripts 777 KiB (38) and fonts 630 KiB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 2.9 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 11 images far larger than shown

    3.0 MB

    11 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example MBU_GLMF_Skys_SmallEventBanner.png at 1,440 px wide, shown at 312 px. Resized copies would save about 3.0 MB.

  • 18 images in older formats

    18 images (5.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 6 images below the first screen load straight away

    6 images further down the page (3.7 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 3.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.72 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.72 g of CO₂e: 445.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 7889
  • 10 tap targets too small

    10 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • Form elements should have a visible label (1 element)

    Form elements should have a visible label: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (19 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 19 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 16 links without text

    16 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h6, h1 → h5 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 43 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 10 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8581
  • Title is long (150 characters)

    Your title is 150 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Maranatha Baptist University in Watertown, WI exists to develop leaders for ministry in t…”.

  • 6 H1 headlines

    There are 6 <h1> headlines (“ONLINE GRADDEGREESSTART HERE”, “10” and “TOP 11%”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 16 links with vague text

    16 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 3 links crawlers can't follow

    3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 248 internal links, 25 external

    The homepage links to 248 pages on mbu.edu and 25 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 155 characters

    Your meta description is 155 characters: “Looking for a Christian college where faith and future come together? Explore majors, campus life, and lasting friendsh…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.mbu.edu/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.mbu.edu/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,298 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 5 pages without a meta description

    https://www.mbu.edu/development/invest-for-eternity, https://www.mbu.edu/development/leadershipbreakfast, https://www.mbu.edu/development/golfclassic, https://www.mbu.edu/university/about/history and https://www.mbu.edu/university/about/consumer-information have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://www.mbu.edu/campus-life/on-campus/global-encounters and https://www.mbu.edu/development/golfclassic have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 5 pages slow to respond

    https://www.mbu.edu/alumni, https://www.mbu.edu/give, https://www.mbu.edu/thrive, https://www.mbu.edu/development/the-heritage-project and https://www.mbu.edu/university/about took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 147 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    13 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 13 small tap targets

    13 of 22 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 403 ()”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 824 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 824 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • 26 calls to action

    The homepage has 26 calls to action, for example “Course Schedule”, “Request Transcripts” and “Apply”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (4 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mbu.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Sucuri

Company

Employees
203
Founded
1968

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 48 issues on mbu.edu, including 20 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25