Website review, no card needed
mega.nz website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202634 issues · 63 checks
This review found 34 issues worth fixing on mega.nz, 11 of them high impact, across 63 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 14.5 MB in 159 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 176 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 176 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 179 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 182 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 187 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 189 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 202 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Avoid multiple page redirects
1.4 sThe page goes through 1 redirect before it starts loading, costing about 1.4 s. Link and advertise the final URL directly.
Mobile performance score: 77
77/100Your mobile performance score is 77 (desktop: 98). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 252 KiBAbout 252 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 264 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Main-thread work: 2.1 s
A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 725 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Minify JavaScript
170 ms · 21 KiB21 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 10 KiBAbout 10 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Minify CSS
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 103 ms
103 msYour server sent the HTML in 103 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 10.0 s
10.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 10.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.2 s
3.2 sReal visitors wait 3.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.8 s
2.8 sThe first text or image appears after 2.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 378 ms
378 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 378 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 4.6 s
4.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 4.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 3.1 s
3.1 sYour largest element takes 3.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.
Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors
+14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 178 ms to 202 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 131 ms
131 msReal visitors wait 131 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.004
0.004The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.004, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 14.5 MB in 159 requests
14.5 MBYour homepage downloads 14.5 MB in 159 requests on a phone: media 8.3 MB (11), images 5.0 MB (89) and scripts 715 KiB (19). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 4.1 g of CO₂ per visit
4.11 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.11 g of CO₂e: 493.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Heading levels should only increase by one (3 elements)
Heading levels should only increase by one: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
No page language
The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.
1 checks passed
34 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 35 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 34 passed and 1 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
robots.txt blocks all crawlers
Your robots.txt disallows the whole site for every crawler, so search engines are told to stay out.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (4 characters)
Your title is only 4 characters: “MEGA”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
3 checks passed
Meta description: 105 characters
Your meta description is 105 characters: “MEGA provides free cloud storage with convenient and powerful always-on privacy. Claim your free 20GB now”.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://mega.nz/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
0%A phone browser shows 761 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Best practices
No mobile viewport
No viewport meta tag, so phones render the desktop layout zoomed out.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Applying inline speculation rules violates the following Content Security Policy directive 'script-src 'self' *.mega.co…”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).
1 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
7 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Content and conversion
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 761 words of copy
The homepage carries about 761 words of visible text.
1 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Sign up” and “Sign up for 20 GB free storage”.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Reddit Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
9 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mega.nz, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 34 issues on mega.nz, including 14 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.