Website review, no card needed

microassist.com logo

microassist.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202618 issues · 74 checks

This review found 18 issues worth fixing on microassist.com, 5 of them high impact, across 74 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s2.1 sMay 16Oct 312.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.8 s
May 23, 20262.8 s
May 30, 20262.5 s
Jun 6, 20262.5 s
Jun 13, 20262.2 s
Jun 20, 20262.2 s
Jun 27, 20262.3 s
Jul 4, 20262.3 s
Jul 11, 20262.5 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.4 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.3 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.5 s
Sep 5, 20262.5 s
Sep 12, 20262.5 s
Sep 19, 20262.5 s
Sep 26, 20262.5 s
Oct 3, 20262.4 s
Oct 10, 20262.5 s
Oct 17, 20262.5 s
Oct 24, 20262.4 s
Oct 31, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
151 ms82 msMay 16Oct 31122 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026128 ms
May 23, 2026143 ms
Jun 6, 2026134 ms
Jun 13, 2026105 ms
Jun 20, 202690 ms
Jun 27, 202694 ms
Jul 4, 2026111 ms
Jul 11, 2026132 ms
Jul 18, 2026133 ms
Jul 25, 2026130 ms
Aug 1, 2026123 ms
Aug 8, 2026119 ms
Aug 15, 2026124 ms
Aug 22, 2026129 ms
Aug 29, 2026133 ms
Sep 5, 2026127 ms
Sep 12, 2026114 ms
Sep 19, 2026114 ms
Sep 26, 2026111 ms
Oct 3, 2026121 ms
Oct 10, 2026121 ms
Oct 17, 2026122 ms
Oct 24, 2026122 ms
Oct 31, 2026122 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of microassist.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. microassist.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. microassist.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. microassist.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. microassist.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. microassist.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. microassist.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. microassist.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. microassist.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

4 to fix75
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.3 s

    17 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    900 ms · 172 KiB

    About 172 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 75

    75/100

    Your mobile performance score is 75. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 56 KiB

    About 56 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 17 KiB

    17 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 8 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 8 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    108 KiB

    1 image could be 108 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare CDN), adding 146 KiB and 74 ms of main-thread time.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 54 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 150 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 9 ms

    9 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 9 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.2 s

    5.2 s

    Your largest element takes 5.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Focused Workplace Collaboration”.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 5.3 s

    5.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 5.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

7 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 122 ms

    122 ms

    Real visitors wait 122 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 10% faster for real visitors

    -10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 128 ms to 122 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002

    0.002

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 2 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix97
  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    Focused-Workplace-Collaboration-1024x576.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 0.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.20 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.20 g of CO₂e: 24.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 737 KiB in 37 requests

    737 KiB

    Your homepage downloads 737 KiB in 37 requests on a phone: scripts 342 KiB (15), images 153 KiB (2) and stylesheets 131 KiB (16). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

1 to fixGoogle 10099
  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 4 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 1 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

Google 100100
  • 146 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 146 pages on microassist.com and 9 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 158 characters

    Your meta description is 158 characters: “Microassist provides digital accessibility services, custom eLearning, instructor-led classes, and secure public safety…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “We build accessible learning and technology, and train the people who use it”.

  • Title: 54 characters

    Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “Microassist | Accessibility, eLearning & Public Safety”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.microassist.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: ImageObject, Organization, Place, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.microassist.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,295 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.microassist.com/llms.txt (3 KiB, 5 links, though it should open with a “# Title” line), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 54 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 7 small tap targets

    7 of 9 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix69
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 527 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 527 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • 13 calls to action

    The homepage has 13 calls to action, for example “GSA Schedule”, “Course Schedule” and “Subscribe”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at microassist.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Company

Headquarters
Austin

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 18 issues on microassist.com, including 11 speed issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25