Website review, no card needed

microbiomelabs.com logo

microbiomelabs.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202641 issues · 64 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on microbiomelabs.com, 18 of them high impact, across 64 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.3 s2.2 sMay 2Oct 174.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.7 s
May 9, 20262.5 s
May 16, 20262.5 s
May 23, 20262.5 s
May 30, 20262.5 s
Jun 6, 20262.5 s
Jun 13, 20262.8 s
Jun 20, 20262.9 s
Jun 27, 20262.9 s
Jul 4, 20263.0 s
Jul 11, 20263.0 s
Jul 18, 20262.9 s
Jul 25, 20262.9 s
Aug 1, 20262.9 s
Aug 8, 20262.7 s
Aug 15, 20262.7 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.9 s
Sep 26, 20263.1 s
Oct 3, 20263.4 s
Oct 10, 20264.1 s
Oct 17, 20264.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
118 ms77 msMay 2Oct 17113 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202686 ms
May 9, 202687 ms
May 16, 202686 ms
May 23, 202683 ms
May 30, 202685 ms
Jun 6, 202682 ms
Jun 13, 202687 ms
Jun 20, 202687 ms
Jun 27, 202687 ms
Jul 4, 202687 ms
Jul 11, 202685 ms
Jul 18, 202685 ms
Jul 25, 202685 ms
Aug 1, 202686 ms
Aug 8, 202687 ms
Aug 15, 202687 ms
Aug 22, 202687 ms
Aug 29, 202687 ms
Sep 5, 202686 ms
Sep 12, 202688 ms
Sep 19, 202692 ms
Sep 26, 202696 ms
Oct 3, 2026104 ms
Oct 10, 2026111 ms
Oct 17, 2026113 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of microbiomelabs.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. microbiomelabs.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. microbiomelabs.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. microbiomelabs.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  4. microbiomelabs.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  5. microbiomelabs.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  6. microbiomelabs.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  7. microbiomelabs.com at 3.8 s3.8 s
  8. microbiomelabs.com at 4.3 s4.3 s

Speed

9 to fix34
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    4.7 s · 1,012 KiB

    About 1,012 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.4 s · 296 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (296 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 34

    34/100

    Your mobile performance score is 34 (desktop: 42). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Improve image delivery

    10.9 MB

    10 images could be 10.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Stripe, Klaviyo and supp.co and others), adding 30.5 MB and 472 ms of main-thread time.

  • azurefd.net adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    azurefd.net costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 29.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Stripe adds 416 ms

    416 ms

    Stripe costs a phone 416 ms of main-thread work and 660 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 451 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 2.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    47 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 47 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 6 ms

    6 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 5.0 s

    5.0 s

    Real visitors wait 5.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.38

    0.38

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.38 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 25.4 s

    25.4 s

    Your largest element takes 25.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 27.0 s

    27.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 27.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.2 s

    7.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.32

    0.32

    The layout shifts by 0.32 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 715 ms

    715 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 715 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 29% slower for real visitors

    +29%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 86 ms to 113 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 56% slower for real visitors

    +56%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 4.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 134 ms

    134 ms

    Real visitors wait 134 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 35.4 MB in 133 requests

    35.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 35.4 MB in 133 requests on a phone: media 18.5 MB (3), images 13.8 MB (14) and scripts 1.8 MB (32). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 10.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    10.03 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 10.03 g of CO₂e: 1203.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fix84
  • 4 buttons without a name

    4 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 8372
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at microbiomelabs.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

3 checks passed
  • Meta description: 122 characters

    Your meta description is 122 characters: “Discover clinically researched microbiome supplements and practitioner education designed to support all health categor…”.

  • Title: 61 characters

    Your title is a healthy 61 characters: “Microbiome Labs™ | Science-Driven Microbiome Health Solutions”.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://microbiomelabs.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix42
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    3%

    A phone browser shows 295 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 9. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://microbiomelabs.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    15 of 15 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix20
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 295 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 295 words of visible text.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Klaviyo (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at microbiomelabs.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Hosting
Azure

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on microbiomelabs.com, including 20 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25