Website review, no card needed
midorihotel.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202649 issues · 94 checks
This review found 49 issues worth fixing on midorihotel.com, 24 of them high impact, across 94 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
67DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 4.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 95 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 97 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 91 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 96 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
3.3 s
6.7 s
10.0 s
13.3 s
16.6 s
20.0 s
23.3 s
26.6 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
5.1 s · 6.9 MB188 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (6.9 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
9.4 s · 1.4 MBAbout 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 9.4 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.9 s20 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.9 s.
Reduce unused CSS
2.3 s · 435 KiBAbout 435 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 10.7 s
A phone's processor spends 10.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 32
32/100Your mobile performance score is 32. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Improve image delivery
2.5 MB71 images could be 2.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google CDN and Google Maps and others), adding 4.5 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.
YouTube adds 492 ms
492 msYouTube costs a phone 492 ms of main-thread work and 991 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google CDN adds 442 ms
442 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 442 ms of main-thread work and 751 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
16 long tasks on the main thread
16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 303 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
2,759 HTML elements
The page has 2,759 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Google Maps adds 217 ms
217 msGoogle Maps costs a phone 217 ms of main-thread work and 467 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Fonts adds 11 ms
11 msGoogle Fonts costs a phone 11 ms of main-thread work and 2.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 33 KiB33 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 22 KiB22 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Legacy JavaScript
100 ms · 14 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 14 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 186 ms
186 msYour server sent the HTML in 186 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.6 s
5.6 sReal visitors wait 5.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.9 s
3.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 3.2 s
3.2 sReal visitors wait 3.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 42.8 s
42.8 sYour largest element takes 42.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 37.2 s
37.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 37.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 43.9 s
43.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 43.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s
1.2 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s
3.3 sThe first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.16
0.16For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.16 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.106
0.106The layout shifts by 0.106 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 95 ms to 96 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user INP: 95 ms
95 msReal visitors wait 95 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 25% faster for real visitors
-25%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.1 s to 4.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 13.3 MB in 268 requests
13.3 MBYour homepage downloads 13.3 MB in 268 requests on a phone: images 7.6 MB (142), scripts 2.7 MB (48) and fonts 2.0 MB (35). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
image_2022_04_04T08_17_39_868Z-960x480.png weighs 489 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
40 images in older formats
40 images (4.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
12 images below the first screen load straight away
12 images further down the page (1.0 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
1 image far larger than shown
8 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example service2.jpg at 525 px wide, shown at 165 px. Resized copies would save about 8 KiB.
About 3.8 g of CO₂ per visit
3.77 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.77 g of CO₂e: 452.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Hidden but focusable
14 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Frames without titles
2 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
6 form fields without a label
6 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 198 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
3 links crawlers can't follow
3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
217 internal links, 33 external
The homepage links to 217 pages on midorihotel.com and 33 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 136 characters
Your meta description is 136 characters: “美多利飯店是克拉克第一家利用水資源回收再生的五星級酒店。佔地總面積約3000坪,建築及室內採當代簡約風格設計,是休閒度假的最佳選擇。藉由空橋串連二棟獨立空間的MIDORI,分別設有酒店及娛樂場,兼具高品質旅遊休憩環境,及休閒娛樂之度假氛圍…”.
Title: 43 characters
Your title is a healthy 43 characters: “Midori Clark Hotel & Casino | 為您打造五星等級的休憩空間”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.midorihotel.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.midorihotel.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.midorihotel.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Other pages
6 pages without a meta description
https://www.midorihotel.com/%e9%97%9c%e6%96%bc%e6%88%91%e5%80%91, https://www.midorihotel.com/%e6%97%85%e5%ae%bf%e5%85%a5%e4%bd%8f, https://www.midorihotel.com/%e7%be%8e%e9%a5%8c%e7%94%a8%e9%a4%90, https://www.midorihotel.com/%e6%9c%8d%e5%8b%99%e8%a8%ad%e6%96%bd, https://www.midorihotel.com/%e5%ae%b4%e6%9c%83%e6%b4%bb%e5%8b%95 and https://www.midorihotel.com/%e6%9c%80%e6%96%b0%e6%b6%88%e6%81%af have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
6 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 6 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.midorihotel.com/%e9%97%9c%e6%96%bc%e6%88%91%e5%80%91, whose canonical is https://www.midorihotel.com/%E9%97%9C%E6%96%BC%E6%88%91%E5%80%91. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page without an H1
https://www.midorihotel.com/%e6%9c%80%e6%96%b0%e6%b6%88%e6%81%af has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
6 pages with very little text
https://www.midorihotel.com/%e9%97%9c%e6%96%bc%e6%88%91%e5%80%91, https://www.midorihotel.com/%e6%97%85%e5%ae%bf%e5%85%a5%e4%bd%8f, https://www.midorihotel.com/%e7%be%8e%e9%a5%8c%e7%94%a8%e9%a4%90, https://www.midorihotel.com/%e6%9c%8d%e5%8b%99%e8%a8%ad%e6%96%bd, https://www.midorihotel.com/%e5%ae%b4%e6%9c%83%e6%b4%bb%e5%8b%95 and https://www.midorihotel.com/%e6%9c%80%e6%96%b0%e6%b6%88%e6%81%af have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
3 pages slow to respond
https://www.midorihotel.com/%e6%97%85%e5%ae%bf%e5%85%a5%e4%bd%8f, https://www.midorihotel.com/%e7%be%8e%e9%a5%8c%e7%94%a8%e9%a4%90 and https://www.midorihotel.com/%e6%9c%80%e6%96%b0%e6%b6%88%e6%81%af took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 35 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
6 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 6 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
32 of 35 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Only about 123 words
The homepage has only about 123 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
4 checks passed
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 16 testimonial or review blocks and 6 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 5 phone links and 6 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
15 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at midorihotel.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Hosting
- Google Cloud
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 49 issues on midorihotel.com, including 25 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.