Website review, no card needed
mmsgroup.co.id website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202644 issues · 84 checks
This review found 44 issues worth fixing on mmsgroup.co.id, 19 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
67DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 118 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 121 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 121 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 114 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.3 s
2.6 s
3.8 s
5.1 s
6.4 s
7.7 s
9.0 s
10.3 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
4.3 s · 2.4 MB105 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.4 MB).
Render-blocking requests
2.5 s36 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.5 s.
Font display
2.1 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 2.1 s).
Mobile performance score: 46
46/100Your mobile performance score is 46. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 686 KiB4 images could be 686 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 214 KiBAbout 214 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
536 KiBAbout 536 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Other Google APIs/SDKs and Google/Doubleclick Ads and others), adding 1.1 MB and 337 ms of main-thread time.
YouTube adds 322 ms
322 msYouTube costs a phone 322 ms of main-thread work and 1,006 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2 long tasks on the main thread
2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 106 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Minify CSS
5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 2.0 s
A phone's processor spends 2.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 831 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 544 ms
544 msYour server sent the HTML in 544 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.37
0.37For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.37 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 15.4 s
15.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 15.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 8.3 s
8.3 sYour largest element takes 8.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “20 Tahun MMSGI Berdayakan Masa Depan “Berdayakan Masa Depan…”. Most of its time is resource load delay (4.1 s).
Time to Interactive: 15.3 s
15.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 15.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.341
0.341The layout shifts by 0.341 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Real-user LCP: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s
2.4 sThe first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
0%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 118 ms to 114 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user INP: 120 ms
120 msReal visitors wait 120 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 28 ms
28 msScripts block the page for only 28 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.7 MB in 129 requests
4.7 MBYour homepage downloads 4.7 MB in 129 requests on a phone: images 2.7 MB (22), scripts 1.2 MB (43) and fonts 350 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
160 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example CFX-TOWER-2-2-1-scaled.jpg at 2,253 px wide, shown at 358 px. Resized copies would save about 160 KiB.
2 images in older formats
2 images (294 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (87 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit
1.33 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.33 g of CO₂e: 159.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (2 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
8 text elements with low contrast
8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
10 links without text
10 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h5 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 22 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 8 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (29 characters)
Your title is only 29 characters: “Beranda - MMS Group Indonesia”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
96 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 96 pages on mmsgroup.co.id and 6 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “20 Tahun MMSGI Berdayakan Masa Depan”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.mmsgi.co.id/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.mmsgi.co.id/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.mmsgi.co.id/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (467 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
/ and https://www.mmsgi.co.id/en all use the title “Beranda - MMS Group Indonesia”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
14 pages without a meta description
https://www.mmsgi.co.id/tentang-mmsgi, https://www.mmsgi.co.id/mms-resources, https://www.mmsgi.co.id/mms-land, https://www.mmsgi.co.id/mms-solution, https://www.mmsgi.co.id/esg and https://www.mmsgi.co.id/esg/environment and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
5 pages without an H1
https://www.mmsgi.co.id/tentang-mmsgi, https://www.mmsgi.co.id/esg/environment, https://www.mmsgi.co.id/esg/social, https://www.mmsgi.co.id/esg/governance and https://www.mmsgi.co.id/line have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 17 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
15 small tap targets
15 of 44 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Loading the script 'https://static.cloudflareinsights.com/beacon.min.js/vce701823e78c4301a35b7e07294d87301792088814092'…”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 375 words of copy
The homepage carries about 375 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
8 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mmsgroup.co.id, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 44 issues on mmsgroup.co.id, including 19 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.