Website review, no card needed

moltonbrown.co.jp logo

moltonbrown.co.jp website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202654 issues · 94 checks

This review found 54 issues worth fixing on moltonbrown.co.jp, 26 of them high impact, across 94 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.0 s1.5 sMay 23Nov 71.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20261.9 s
Jun 6, 20261.9 s
Jun 13, 20261.9 s
Jun 20, 20261.9 s
Jun 27, 20261.9 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20261.9 s
Jul 18, 20261.9 s
Jul 25, 20261.9 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.9 s
Aug 15, 20261.9 s
Aug 22, 20261.9 s
Aug 29, 20261.9 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20261.9 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.7 s
Oct 17, 20261.7 s
Oct 24, 20261.7 s
Oct 31, 20261.6 s
Nov 7, 20261.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
246 ms193 msMay 23Nov 7199 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026230 ms
May 30, 2026232 ms
Jun 6, 2026234 ms
Jun 13, 2026235 ms
Jun 20, 2026234 ms
Jun 27, 2026238 ms
Jul 4, 2026240 ms
Jul 11, 2026235 ms
Jul 18, 2026225 ms
Jul 25, 2026223 ms
Aug 1, 2026226 ms
Aug 8, 2026230 ms
Aug 15, 2026237 ms
Aug 22, 2026236 ms
Aug 29, 2026234 ms
Sep 5, 2026234 ms
Sep 12, 2026221 ms
Sep 19, 2026220 ms
Sep 26, 2026211 ms
Oct 3, 2026204 ms
Oct 10, 2026207 ms
Oct 17, 2026208 ms
Oct 24, 2026205 ms
Oct 31, 2026202 ms
Nov 7, 2026199 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of moltonbrown.co.jp (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. moltonbrown.co.jp at 1.6 s1.6 s
  2. moltonbrown.co.jp at 3.1 s3.1 s
  3. moltonbrown.co.jp at 4.7 s4.7 s
  4. moltonbrown.co.jp at 6.3 s6.3 s
  5. moltonbrown.co.jp at 7.9 s7.9 s
  6. moltonbrown.co.jp at 9.4 s9.4 s
  7. moltonbrown.co.jp at 11.0 s11.0 s
  8. moltonbrown.co.jp at 12.6 s12.6 s

Speed

15 to fix17
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.8 s · 18.2 MB

    73 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (18.2 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.4 s · 1.2 MB

    About 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.4 s faster on a phone.

  • wovn.io adds 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    wovn.io costs a phone 1.4 s of main-thread work and 223 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.3 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.

  • Main-thread work: 12.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 12.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 17

    17/100

    Your mobile performance score is 17. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 4,682 HTML elements

    The page has 4,682 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (wovn.io, Google Tag Manager and cloudfront.net and others), adding 20.6 MB and 3.5 s of main-thread time.

  • visumo.jp adds 118 ms

    118 ms

    visumo.jp costs a phone 118 ms of main-thread work and 17.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.2 MB

    13 images could be 1.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 887 ms

    887 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 887 ms of main-thread work and 1,005 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    750 ms · 149 KiB

    About 149 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • cloudfront.net adds 469 ms

    469 ms

    cloudfront.net costs a phone 469 ms of main-thread work and 1,000 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 467 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Shopify adds 188 ms

    188 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 188 ms of main-thread work and 343 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    36 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 36 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    18 KiB

    18 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Minify CSS

    8 KiB

    8 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 11 ms

    11 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 11 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 28.0 s

    28.0 s

    Your largest element takes 28.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 30.4 s

    30.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 30.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 67.1 s

    67.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 67.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.394

    0.394

    The layout shifts by 0.394 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user INP: 213 ms

    213 ms

    Real visitors wait 213 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 13 images without width and height

    13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.08

    0.08

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 369 ms

    369 ms

    Real visitors wait 369 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 13% faster for real visitors

    -13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 230 ms to 199 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 16% faster for real visitors

    -16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 28.6 MB in 342 requests

    28.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 28.6 MB in 342 requests on a phone: media 17.0 MB (14), images 7.3 MB (81) and scripts 3.1 MB (124). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 15 images far larger than shown

    5.2 MB

    15 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example mbn-07.jpg at 5,906 px wide, shown at 294 px. Resized copies would save about 5.2 MB.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 3.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 19 images below the first screen load straight away

    19 images further down the page (5.9 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 7 images in older formats

    7 images (749 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 8.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    8.12 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 8.12 g of CO₂e: 974.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 7187
  • ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (1 element)

    ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 32 tap targets too small

    32 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 20 images without alt text

    20 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 38 links without text

    38 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings should not be empty (2 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 10 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 7787
  • 82 links crawlers can't follow

    82 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 6 H1 headlines

    There are 6 <h1> headlines (“MOLTON BROWN”, “The Festive Collection” and “カテゴリーから選ぶ”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 30 links with vague text

    30 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 477 internal links, 13 external

    The homepage links to 477 pages on moltonbrown.co.jp and 13 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 159 characters

    Your meta description is 159 characters: “モルトンブラウンは、1971年にロンドンのサウスモルトンストリートで誕生した、ブリティッシュスタイルを象徴するラグジュアリーフレグランスブランドです。豊かなアロマ、心地よいテクスチャー、スタイリッシュなパッケージの商品を取り揃えております…”.

  • Title: 33 characters

    Your title is a healthy 33 characters: “モルトンブラウン公式オンラインストア – MOLTON BROWN”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.moltonbrown.co.jp/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.moltonbrown.co.jp/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix63
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    8%

    A phone browser shows 4,792 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 382. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.moltonbrown.co.jp/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://www.moltonbrown.co.jp/pages/rewards_club, https://www.moltonbrown.co.jp/pages/holiday2026 and https://www.moltonbrown.co.jp/pages/engraving have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 9 pages without an H1

    https://www.moltonbrown.co.jp/pages/rewards_club, https://www.moltonbrown.co.jp/pages/shoplist, https://www.moltonbrown.co.jp/pages/holiday2026, https://www.moltonbrown.co.jp/collections/gifts, https://www.moltonbrown.co.jp/products/mbg24017 and https://www.moltonbrown.co.jp/pages/engraving and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 9 pages with very little text

    https://www.moltonbrown.co.jp/pages/rewards_club, https://www.moltonbrown.co.jp/pages/shoplist, https://www.moltonbrown.co.jp/pages/holiday2026, https://www.moltonbrown.co.jp/collections/gifts, https://www.moltonbrown.co.jp/products/mbg24017 and https://www.moltonbrown.co.jp/pages/engraving and 3 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 171 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    9 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 9 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 7383
  • 39 small tap targets

    39 of 111 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 2 distorted images

    2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 4,792 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 4,792 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Klaviyo and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 28 cookies set on arrival

    28

    Opening the homepage sets 28 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 56 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 56 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at moltonbrown.co.jp, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 8 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Anygift · Firework Shoppable Video Ugc · Helium Customer Fields · Omni Hub · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · S Contact Form Builder · amazonaws.com · useamp.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Shopify

Hiring

Hiring
9 open roles
Teams
Retail (7), Marketing (1), Sales (1)
Job board
greenhouse

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 54 issues on moltonbrown.co.jp, including 24 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25