Website review, no card needed
moxionpower.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202631 issues · 82 checks
This review found 31 issues worth fixing on moxionpower.com, 12 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
82BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 86 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 79 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 82 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 71 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.2 s
1.6 s
2.0 s
2.3 s
2.7 s
3.1 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.7 s · 1.0 MB90 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.0 MB).
Improve image delivery
2.0 s · 516 KiB2 images could be 516 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.0 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.2 s40 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.2 s.
Mobile performance score: 61
61/100Your mobile performance score is 61. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
450 ms · 86 KiBAbout 86 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 61 KiBAbout 61 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 333 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
5 third-party services on the page
5 third-party services load with your homepage (cdn-cookieyes.com, wpmucdn.com and Adobe TypeKit and others), adding 434 KiB and 60 ms of main-thread time.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.7 s
A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 448 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 21 ms
21 msYour server sent the HTML in 21 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 45.3 s
45.3 sYour largest element takes 45.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Welcome You’ve been redirected to Viridi. If you were looki…”.
Speed Index: 20.7 s
20.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 20.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 46.5 s
46.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 46.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s
2.6 sThe first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
10 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 71 ms
71 msReal visitors wait 71 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 651 ms
651 msReal visitors wait 651 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 14% faster for real visitors
-14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 86 ms to 71 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors
-12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 1 ms
1 msScripts block the page for only 1 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 10.6 MB in 111 requests
10.6 MBYour homepage downloads 10.6 MB in 111 requests on a phone: images 9.1 MB (13), fonts 822 KiB (10) and scripts 529 KiB (37). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 8.0 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
2 images far larger than shown
2.1 MB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Flag-Logo-Horizontal.svg at 505 px wide, shown at 130 px. Resized copies would save about 2.1 MB.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (4.7 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
2 images in older formats
2 images (720 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 3.0 g of CO₂ per visit
3.01 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.01 g of CO₂e: 360.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
5 text elements with low contrast
5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4 and h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 13 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (23 characters)
Your title is only 23 characters: “Moxion-Inquire – Viridi”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
103 internal links, 14 external
The homepage links to 103 pages on moxionpower.com and 14 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Welcome”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://viridiparente.com/moxion-inquire/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://viridiparente.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://viridiparente.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (471 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages without a meta description
https://viridiparente.com/products and https://viridiparente.com/faq have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://viridiparente.com/viridi-takes-over-moxion-hq-secures-9-3m-cec-grant and https://viridiparente.com/power-that-pays-for-itself use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 page without an H1
https://viridiparente.com/faq has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 35 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
6 small tap targets
6 of 13 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 323 words of copy
The homepage carries about 323 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “LEARN MORE” and “contact us”.
6 calls to action
The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “LEARN MORE” and “contact us”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Matomo.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 2 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
9 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: CookieYes
A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at moxionpower.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2025.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Matomo
- Hosting
- Squarespace
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 31 issues on moxionpower.com, including 12 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.