Website review, no card needed
muvfl.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202636 issues · 79 checks
This review found 36 issues worth fixing on muvfl.com, 16 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: mobile performance score: 42. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
70CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 197 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 200 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 200 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 174 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 186 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Mobile performance score: 42
42/100Your mobile performance score is 42. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 9.4 s
A phone's processor spends 9.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
7,490 HTML elements
The page has 7,490 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.5 MBAbout 1.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Improve image delivery
1.3 MB11 images could be 1.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Render-blocking requests
800 ms3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 800 ms.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (medchatapp.com, Clarity and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 2.0 MB and 490 ms of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
489 KiB57 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (489 KiB).
medchatapp.com adds 234 ms
234 msmedchatapp.com costs a phone 234 ms of main-thread work and 1.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 344 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
97 KiBAbout 97 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
21 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 11 ms
11 msYour server sent the HTML in 11 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.32
0.32For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.32 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Time to Interactive: 34.9 s
34.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 34.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.718
0.718The layout shifts by 0.718 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 1.6 s
1.6 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 9.0 s
9.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 214 ms
214 msReal visitors wait 214 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 86% slower for real visitors
+86%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 928 ms
928 msReal visitors wait 928 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
8 images without width and height
8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 197 ms to 186 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s
1.1 sThe first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Largest Contentful Paint: 1.1 s
1.1 sYour largest element renders in 1.1 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Search for Cannabis Products”.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.9 MB in 280 requests
6.9 MBYour homepage downloads 6.9 MB in 280 requests on a phone: scripts 3.4 MB (75), images 2.1 MB (93) and other files 758 KiB (89). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
6 images far larger than shown
686 KiB6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example MUV_Web_Terpene-Tiles_Pinene_M.png at 480 px wide, shown at 111 px. Resized copies would save about 686 KiB.
About 2.0 g of CO₂ per visit
1.96 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.96 g of CO₂e: 235.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (1 element)
Images must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
17 text elements with low contrast
17 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (3 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
21 links without text
21 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).
1 checks passed
53 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 53 passed and 3 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
93 internal links, 4 external
The homepage links to 93 pages on muvfl.com and 4 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 130 characters
Your meta description is 130 characters: “Check out MÜV cannabis dispensaries in Florida where you'll find nothing but the best products and support from ou…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “MÜV Medical Cannabis Dispensaries”.
Title: 44 characters
Your title is a healthy 44 characters: “Florida Medical Marijuana Dispensaries | MÜV”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://muvfl.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: FAQPage and Organization.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://muvfl.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
19%A phone browser shows 3,438 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 641. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No llms.txt
There is no https://muvfl.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
https://muvfl.com/coa-portal has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
https://muvfl.com/coa-portal has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 30 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=187116912&Ver=2&mid=5f5bc5ce-7b4c-46e8-8773-6bfff204236b&bo=1&sid=9dd16790d4e011f19b7259a461d46a5b&vid=9dd18db0d4e011f18b212318f9aa166e&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&l.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
127 of 134 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 3,438 words of copy
The homepage carries about 3,438 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Apply for a Medical CardLearn more”, “Download on the App Store” and “Shop All”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Ads and Microsoft Clarity and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
19 cookies set on arrival
19Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
28 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 28 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at muvfl.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- Next.js
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 36 issues on muvfl.com, including 20 speed issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.