Website review, no card needed

myaic.com logo

myaic.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202636 issues · 75 checks

This review found 36 issues worth fixing on myaic.com, 6 of them high impact, across 75 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 16.3 MB in 34 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.0 s808 msMay 16Oct 31947 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.3 s
May 23, 20261.5 s
May 30, 20261.3 s
Jun 6, 20261.3 s
Jul 11, 20261.6 s
Jul 18, 20261.9 s
Jul 25, 20261.6 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.3 s
Sep 5, 2026987 ms
Sep 12, 20261.0 s
Sep 19, 20261.1 s
Sep 26, 20261.4 s
Oct 3, 20261.3 s
Oct 10, 20261.1 s
Oct 17, 20261.2 s
Oct 24, 2026985 ms
Oct 31, 2026947 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of myaic.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. myaic.com at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. myaic.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  3. myaic.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  4. myaic.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  5. myaic.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  6. myaic.com at 4.1 s4.1 s
  7. myaic.com at 4.7 s4.7 s
  8. myaic.com at 5.4 s5.4 s

Speed

5 to fix88
  • Mobile performance score: 88

    88/100

    Your mobile performance score is 88. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    900 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 900 ms.

  • Improve image delivery

    400 ms · 428 KiB

    11 images could be 428 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 400 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    357 KiB

    About 357 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Google CDN adds 227 ms

    227 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 227 ms of main-thread work and 733 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, jQuery CDN and Other Google APIs/SDKs), adding 798 KiB and 309 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 58 KiB

    About 58 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    91 KiB

    2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (91 KiB).

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 72 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 672 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Speed Index: 7.4 s

    7.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 9.0 s

    9.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 9.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Your largest element takes 2.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below. Most of its time is resource load delay (1.2 s).

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 30% faster for real visitors

    -30%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 0.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 43 ms

    43 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 43 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix43
  • Page weight: 16.3 MB in 34 requests

    16.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 16.3 MB in 34 requests on a phone: media 13.9 MB (3), images 1.1 MB (16) and scripts 783 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 10 images in older formats

    10 images (747 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 9 images below the first screen load straight away

    9 images further down the page (658 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 6 images far larger than shown

    97 KiB

    6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example engineering-services-2.jpg at 793 px wide, shown at 249 px. Resized copies would save about 97 KiB.

  • About 4.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.61 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.61 g of CO₂e: 553.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8992
  • 12 images without alt text

    12 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (51 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 51 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 9 links without text

    9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 6 form fields without a label

    6 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9271
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (19 characters)

    Your title is only 19 characters: “AIC Heating Systems”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://myaic.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 71 internal links, 2 external

    The homepage links to 71 pages on myaic.com and 2 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Meta description: 80 characters

    Your meta description is 80 characters: “Experience the power of effective heat transfer with our heat exchange solutions”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://myaic.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (680 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 4 pages share a title

    /, https://myaic.com/index, https://myaic.com/company-details and https://myaic.com/gdpr-list all use the title “AIC Heating Systems”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://myaic.com/privacy-policy has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages share a meta description

    https://myaic.com/index, https://myaic.com/company-details and https://myaic.com/gdpr-list use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://myaic.com/index, https://myaic.com/design-engineering, https://myaic.com/serial-production, https://myaic.com/applications, https://myaic.com/contact and https://myaic.com/company-details and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    https://myaic.com/company-details and https://myaic.com/gdpr-list have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 26 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 19 small tap targets

    19 of 40 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix67
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • A 10-field form

    Your longest form asks for 10 fields (4 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 435 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 435 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact”.

  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact”.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 2 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 3 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at myaic.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Hosting
Cyber_Folks S.A.

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 36 issues on myaic.com, including 10 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25